Suppr超能文献

堕胎机会和堕胎法律框架的利弊:来自英国的经验教训。

Abortion Access and the Benefits and Limitations of Abortion- Legal Frameworks: Lessons from the United Kingdom.

机构信息

Centre for Ethics and Law in the Life Sciences, Durham Law School, Durham University, Durham, UK.

Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Ethics and Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology and Bioethics at Harvard Law School, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2023 Jul;32(3):378-390. doi: 10.1017/S096318012200086X. Epub 2023 Jan 23.

Abstract

This paper argues that abortion access is an important subject for bioethics scholarship and reflects on the relationship between legal frameworks and access to care. The author uses the example of the United Kingdom to examine the benefits and limitations of abortion- legal frameworks in terms of access. These are legal frameworks that enable the provision of abortion but subject to restrictions. An abortion-permissive regime-first in Great Britain and then in Northern Ireland-has gone some way to improving access to care over time. However, aspects of the regime (that lead to its description as permissive rather than supportive of abortion) have the potential to endanger abortion access in the future and so legal reform is necessary.

摘要

本文认为,堕胎机会是生物伦理学研究的一个重要课题,并反思了法律框架与获得护理之间的关系。作者以英国为例,从获得护理的角度,审视了堕胎法律框架的益处和局限性。这些法律框架允许提供堕胎服务,但要受到限制。一段时间以来,一种堕胎许可制度——先是在大不列颠,然后是在北爱尔兰——在一定程度上改善了护理的可及性。然而,该制度的某些方面(导致其被描述为对堕胎的宽容而不是支持)有可能危及未来的堕胎机会,因此需要进行法律改革。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验