Kuroda Taiyo, Miyagi Chihiro, Fukamachi Kiyotaka, Karimov Jamshid H
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jan 6;9:972132. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.972132. eCollection 2022.
In contrast to the advanced development of the left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy for advanced heart failure, the mechanical circulatory support (MCS) with biventricular assist device (BVAD) and total artificial heart (TAH) options remain challenging. The treatment strategy of BVAD and TAH therapy largely depends on the support duration. For example, an extracorporeal centrifugal pump, typically referred to as a temporary surgical extracorporeal right ventricular assist device, is implanted for the short term with acute right ventricular failure following LVAD implantation. Meanwhile, off-label use of a durable implantable LVAD is a strategy for long-term right ventricular support. Hence, this review focuses on the current treatment strategies and clinical outcomes based on each ventricle support duration. In addition, the issue of heart failure post-heart transplantation (post-HT) is explored. We will discuss MCS therapy options for post-HT recipients.
与晚期心力衰竭的左心室辅助装置(LVAD)治疗的先进发展相比,双心室辅助装置(BVAD)和全人工心脏(TAH)的机械循环支持(MCS)选择仍然具有挑战性。BVAD和TAH治疗的策略很大程度上取决于支持持续时间。例如,一种体外离心泵,通常称为临时手术体外右心室辅助装置,在LVAD植入后因急性右心室衰竭而短期植入。同时,耐用可植入LVAD的标签外使用是长期右心室支持的一种策略。因此,本综述重点关注基于每个心室支持持续时间的当前治疗策略和临床结果。此外,还探讨了心脏移植后(HT后)的心力衰竭问题。我们将讨论HT后受者的MCS治疗选择。