Liao Feng-Ching, Chien Chih-Yin, Lin Shu-I, Huang Chun-Che, Tsai Ming-Feng, Chiou Wei-Ru, Lin Po-Lin, Kuo Jen-Yuan, Tsai Cheng-Ting, Lee Ying-Hsiang
Cardiovascular Center, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei.
Department of Medicine, MacKay Medical College, New Taipei City.
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2023 Jan;39(1):109-115. doi: 10.6515/ACS.202301_39(1).20220603C.
Current guidelines recommend that all infected cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) should be removed. However, financial or anatomical concerns can lead to management of infection with simple debridement, as opposed to complete removal. In this observational study, we report the outcomes of our modified procedure for this real-world dilemma.
The Quarantine (RESQ) method is characterized as follows: the removal (R) of all non-essential foreign materials, including old sutures and leads; the excision (E) of all non-viable, chronically inflamed, granulation, or scar tissue; the sterilization (S) of the remaining generator; and the quarantine (Q) of a new pocket in the sub-muscular layer for reimplantation. From a review of electronic medical records, 30 patients were selected and divided into three groups according to the intervention used: RESQ (n = 9) in group A, simple debridement (n = 16) in group B, and guideline-recommended replacement (n = 5) in group C. Patient baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. After analyzing the proportion of patients that were free from infection one year following their respective interventions, we found that group A performed better than group B (100% and 31.2% infection-free, respectively, p = 0.001), and was comparable to group C (both 100% infection-free, p = not applicable).
The RESQ method is a feasible and beneficial alternative for selected patients with CIED infections who are unable to receive a generator replacement according to the recommended guideline.
当前指南建议,所有感染的心脏植入式电子设备(CIED)均应移除。然而,出于经济或解剖学方面的考虑,可能会采用单纯清创术来处理感染,而非完全移除设备。在这项观察性研究中,我们报告了针对这一现实困境的改良手术的结果。
隔离(RESQ)方法的特点如下:移除(R)所有非必要的异物,包括旧缝线和导线;切除(E)所有无活力、慢性发炎、肉芽组织或瘢痕组织;对剩余的发生器进行消毒(S);在肌肉下层隔离(Q)一个新的囊袋用于重新植入。通过回顾电子病历,选择了30例患者,并根据所采用的干预措施分为三组:A组采用RESQ方法(n = 9),B组采用单纯清创术(n = 16),C组采用指南推荐的更换术(n = 5)。各组患者的基线特征相似。在分析了各自干预措施后一年无感染的患者比例后,我们发现A组的表现优于B组(分别为100%和31.2%无感染,p = 0.001),且与C组相当(均为100%无感染,p = 不适用)。
对于某些根据推荐指南无法接受发生器更换的CIED感染患者,RESQ方法是一种可行且有益的替代方案。