• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

移除、切除、消毒和隔离(RESQ)方法是心脏植入式电子设备感染的一种可行替代治疗方法。

The Removal, Excision, Sterilization, and Quarantine (RESQ) Method is a Feasible Alternative Treatment for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infections.

作者信息

Liao Feng-Ching, Chien Chih-Yin, Lin Shu-I, Huang Chun-Che, Tsai Ming-Feng, Chiou Wei-Ru, Lin Po-Lin, Kuo Jen-Yuan, Tsai Cheng-Ting, Lee Ying-Hsiang

机构信息

Cardiovascular Center, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei.

Department of Medicine, MacKay Medical College, New Taipei City.

出版信息

Acta Cardiol Sin. 2023 Jan;39(1):109-115. doi: 10.6515/ACS.202301_39(1).20220603C.

DOI:10.6515/ACS.202301_39(1).20220603C
PMID:36685152
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9829847/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend that all infected cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) should be removed. However, financial or anatomical concerns can lead to management of infection with simple debridement, as opposed to complete removal. In this observational study, we report the outcomes of our modified procedure for this real-world dilemma.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The Quarantine (RESQ) method is characterized as follows: the removal (R) of all non-essential foreign materials, including old sutures and leads; the excision (E) of all non-viable, chronically inflamed, granulation, or scar tissue; the sterilization (S) of the remaining generator; and the quarantine (Q) of a new pocket in the sub-muscular layer for reimplantation. From a review of electronic medical records, 30 patients were selected and divided into three groups according to the intervention used: RESQ (n = 9) in group A, simple debridement (n = 16) in group B, and guideline-recommended replacement (n = 5) in group C. Patient baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. After analyzing the proportion of patients that were free from infection one year following their respective interventions, we found that group A performed better than group B (100% and 31.2% infection-free, respectively, p = 0.001), and was comparable to group C (both 100% infection-free, p = not applicable).

CONCLUSIONS

The RESQ method is a feasible and beneficial alternative for selected patients with CIED infections who are unable to receive a generator replacement according to the recommended guideline.

摘要

背景

当前指南建议,所有感染的心脏植入式电子设备(CIED)均应移除。然而,出于经济或解剖学方面的考虑,可能会采用单纯清创术来处理感染,而非完全移除设备。在这项观察性研究中,我们报告了针对这一现实困境的改良手术的结果。

方法与结果

隔离(RESQ)方法的特点如下:移除(R)所有非必要的异物,包括旧缝线和导线;切除(E)所有无活力、慢性发炎、肉芽组织或瘢痕组织;对剩余的发生器进行消毒(S);在肌肉下层隔离(Q)一个新的囊袋用于重新植入。通过回顾电子病历,选择了30例患者,并根据所采用的干预措施分为三组:A组采用RESQ方法(n = 9),B组采用单纯清创术(n = 16),C组采用指南推荐的更换术(n = 5)。各组患者的基线特征相似。在分析了各自干预措施后一年无感染的患者比例后,我们发现A组的表现优于B组(分别为100%和31.2%无感染,p = 0.001),且与C组相当(均为100%无感染,p = 不适用)。

结论

对于某些根据推荐指南无法接受发生器更换的CIED感染患者,RESQ方法是一种可行且有益的替代方案。

相似文献

1
The Removal, Excision, Sterilization, and Quarantine (RESQ) Method is a Feasible Alternative Treatment for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infections.移除、切除、消毒和隔离(RESQ)方法是心脏植入式电子设备感染的一种可行替代治疗方法。
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2023 Jan;39(1):109-115. doi: 10.6515/ACS.202301_39(1).20220603C.
2
Conservative management of infected pacemaker and implantable defibrillator sites with a closed antimicrobial irrigation system.采用封闭式抗菌灌洗系统对感染的起搏器和植入式除颤器部位进行保守治疗。
Europace. 2013 Apr;15(4):541-5. doi: 10.1093/europace/eus317. Epub 2012 Sep 26.
3
Safety and Efficacy of Submuscular Implantation With Resterilized Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device in Patients With Device Infection: A Retrospective Observational Study in Taiwan.重新消毒的心脏植入式电子设备肌下植入治疗设备感染患者的安全性和有效性:台湾一项回顾性观察研究
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022 Apr 10;9(5):ofac100. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac100. eCollection 2022 May.
4
Effect of fibrotic capsule debridement during generator replacement on cardiac implantable electronic device infection risk.纤维囊清创术在心脏植入式电子设备感染风险中的作用:更换发生器时。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2020 Jun;58(1):113-118. doi: 10.1007/s10840-019-00581-4. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
5
A Systematic Review of Short-Term Outcomes of Leadless Pacemaker Implantation After Transvenous Lead Removal of Infected Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device.经静脉移除感染性心脏植入式电子设备后植入无导线起搏器的短期结局的系统评价。
Am J Cardiol. 2023 Sep 15;203:444-450. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.07.071. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
6
Unusual conservative treatment of a complicated pacemaker pocket infection: a case report.复杂起搏器囊袋感染的非常规保守治疗:一例报告
J Med Case Rep. 2019 Mar 3;13(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s13256-019-1987-x.
7
Low lateral thoracic site for cardiac implantable electronic device implantation: A viable alternative in patients with limited access options after infected device extraction.低位侧胸部位用于心脏植入式电子设备植入:在感染性设备取出后,对于可选择入路有限的患者,这是一种可行的替代方法。
Heart Rhythm. 2017 Oct;14(10):1506-1514. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.06.004. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
8
Outcomes of complete removal versus conservative therapy in cardiac implantable electronic device infections - A systematic review and Meta-analysis.心脏植入式电子设备感染中完全清除与保守治疗的结局比较:系统评价和 Meta 分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2024 Sep 15;411:132264. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132264. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
9
Epicardial pacemaker as a bridge for pacemaker-dependent patients undergoing explantation of infected cardiac implantable electronic devices.心外膜起搏器作为依赖起搏器的患者在感染性心脏植入式电子设备取出术期间的过渡手段。
J Card Surg. 2019 Jun;34(6):424-427. doi: 10.1111/jocs.14058. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
10
Contemporary Management of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection: The American College of Cardiology COGNITO Survey.心脏植入式电子设备感染的当代管理:美国心脏病学会认知调查
JACC Adv. 2023 Dec 20;3(2):100773. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100773. eCollection 2024 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
Delayed Complication of Penetrating Cardiac Injury: Traumatic VSD.穿透性心脏损伤的迟发性并发症:创伤性室间隔缺损
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2021 Sep;37(5):554-556. doi: 10.6515/ACS.202109_37(5).20210412A.
2
The Use and Clinical Outcomes of Single-Burr Rotational Atherectomy: The Experience of a Local Hospital in Taiwan.单旋磨术的应用及临床结果:台湾一家当地医院的经验
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2020 May;36(3):233-239. doi: 10.6515/ACS.202005_36(3).20190922A.
3
European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) international consensus document on how to prevent, diagnose, and treat cardiac implantable electronic device infections-endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS), International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases (ISCVID) and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS).欧洲心脏病学会(EHRA)关于如何预防、诊断和治疗心脏植入式电子设备感染的国际共识文件——得到了心律学会(HRS)、亚太心律学会(APHRS)、拉丁美洲心律学会(LAHRS)、心血管感染性疾病国际学会(ISCVID)和欧洲临床微生物学和传染病学会(ESCMID)的认可,该共识文件是与欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)合作制定的。
Europace. 2020 Apr 1;22(4):515-549. doi: 10.1093/europace/euz246.
4
Effectiveness of a Non-Taped Compression Dress in Patients Receiving Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices.非粘贴式加压服对接受心脏植入式电子设备患者的有效性。
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2019 May;35(3):320-324. doi: 10.6515/ACS.201905_35(3).20190107A.
5
2017 HRS expert consensus statement on cardiovascular implantable electronic device lead management and extraction.2017年心律学会心血管植入式电子装置导线管理与拔除专家共识声明
Heart Rhythm. 2017 Dec;14(12):e503-e551. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
6
Reimplantation and Repeat Infection After Cardiac-Implantable Electronic Device Infections: Experience From the MEDIC (Multicenter Electrophysiologic Device Infection Cohort) Database.心脏植入式电子设备感染后的再植入与重复感染:来自MEDIC(多中心电生理设备感染队列)数据库的经验
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017 Mar;10(3). doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.116.004822.
7
How Long Should Prophylactic Antibiotics be Prescribed for Permanent Pacemaker Implantations? One Day versus Three Days.永久性起搏器植入术预防性使用抗生素的时长应为多久?一日与三日的对比。
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2013 Jul;29(4):341-6.
8
Effect of early diagnosis and treatment with percutaneous lead extraction on survival in patients with cardiac device infections.经皮导线拔除术对心脏器械感染患者生存的早期诊断和治疗效果。
Am J Cardiol. 2012 May 15;109(10):1466-71. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.01.360. Epub 2012 Feb 21.
9
Impact of timing of device removal on mortality in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections.器械移除时机对心血管植入式电子设备感染患者死亡率的影响。
Heart Rhythm. 2011 Nov;8(11):1678-85. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.05.015. Epub 2011 May 27.
10
Sonication of explanted cardiac rhythm management devices for the diagnosis of pocket infections and asymptomatic bacterial colonization.对取出的心脏节律管理设备进行超声处理以诊断囊袋感染和无症状细菌定植。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011 Feb;34(2):143-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02820.x.