• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自膨胀式经导管主动脉瓣置换术后主动脉瓣形态及瓣周漏的改善情况

Aortic valve morphology and paravalvular leak regression after a self-expandable transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

作者信息

Jin Qinchun, Li Wei, Chen Shasha, Li Mingfei, Zhou Daxin, Zhang Xiaochun, Ge Junbo

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Front Physiol. 2023 Jan 6;13:1088681. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.1088681. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fphys.2022.1088681
PMID:36685205
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9853023/
Abstract

The study aimed to compare paravalvular leak (PVL) changes after a transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with self-expandable prosthesis between different aortic valve morphologies and evaluate the impact of paravalvular leak regression on clinical prognosis. Patients with aortic stenosis (AS) successfully treated with a self-expandable TAVR who were followed up for at least 1 year at our centre were consecutively enrolled from January 2016 to August 2019. Paired serial changes in paravalvular leak and other haemodynamic parameters by echocardiography were collected and compared between the bicuspid valve (BAV) and tricuspid aortic valve (TAV). A logistic regression model was used to explore the predictors of paravalvular leak regression (<1 grade) 1 year after transcatheter aortic valve replacement, while its impact on subsequent clinical outcomes (all-cause mortality and rehospitalisation for heart failure (HF)) was further evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. A total of 153 bicuspid valve and 114 tricuspid aortic valve patients were finally enrolled; haemodynamic parameters and paravalvular leak severity were comparable before the discharge between the two groups. The peak transaortic velocity, mean transvalvular gradient, and effective orifice area all significantly improved ( < 0.05) without intergroup differences at all follow-up timepoints. Significant paravalvular leak reduction was observed only in the TAV group (1.75% 4.39%, = 0.029), while moderate paravalular leak was still more prevalent in BAV (7.19% 1.75%, = 0.041) at the 1-year follow-up. Multivariable analyses identified the bicuspid valve, asymmetric calcification, and undersizing as independent predictors of failure of the 1-year paravalvular leak reduction in patients with mild or moderate paravalvular leak after discharge. Patients without a paravalvular leak reduction within 1 year showed a relatively higher 2-year all-cause mortality and HF (HR: 5.994, 95% CI: 1.691-21.240, and = 0.053) rates thereafter. In AS patients after self-expandable transcatheter aortic valve replacement, paravalvular leak regression within 1 year was less prevalent in bicuspid valve morphology. The failure of paravalvular leak reduction might lead to an increased risk of poorer prognosis in the long run.

摘要

本研究旨在比较经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)使用自膨胀式假体后不同主动脉瓣形态的瓣周漏(PVL)变化,并评估瓣周漏消退对临床预后的影响。2016年1月至2019年8月,连续纳入在本中心接受自膨胀式TAVR成功治疗且随访至少1年的主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者。通过超声心动图收集并比较二尖瓣(BAV)和三尖瓣主动脉瓣(TAV)的瓣周漏及其他血流动力学参数的配对系列变化。使用逻辑回归模型探索经导管主动脉瓣置换术后1年瓣周漏消退(<1级)的预测因素,同时使用Kaplan-Meier分析进一步评估其对后续临床结局(全因死亡率和心力衰竭(HF)再住院)的影响。最终共纳入153例二尖瓣患者和114例三尖瓣主动脉瓣患者;两组出院前的血流动力学参数和瓣周漏严重程度具有可比性。在所有随访时间点,跨主动脉峰值流速、平均跨瓣压差和有效瓣口面积均显著改善(<0.05),且组间无差异。仅在TAV组观察到瓣周漏显著减少(1.75%对4.39%,P = 0.029),而在1年随访时,中度瓣周漏在BAV中仍更常见(7.19%对1.75%,P = 0.041)。多变量分析确定二尖瓣、不对称钙化和尺寸过小是出院后轻度或中度瓣周漏患者1年瓣周漏减少失败的独立预测因素。1年内未出现瓣周漏减少的患者此后2年全因死亡率和HF发生率相对较高(HR:5.994,95%CI:1.691 - 21.240,P = 0.053)。在接受自膨胀式经导管主动脉瓣置换术的AS患者中,二尖瓣形态在1年内瓣周漏消退较少见。瓣周漏减少失败可能会导致长期预后较差风险增加。

相似文献

1
Aortic valve morphology and paravalvular leak regression after a self-expandable transcatheter aortic valve replacement.自膨胀式经导管主动脉瓣置换术后主动脉瓣形态及瓣周漏的改善情况
Front Physiol. 2023 Jan 6;13:1088681. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.1088681. eCollection 2022.
2
Clinical outcomes of bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve stenosis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with self-expandable valves.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后使用自膨式瓣膜治疗二叶式主动脉瓣与三叶式主动脉瓣狭窄的临床结局。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022 Dec 12;22(1):540. doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-02943-9.
3
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement for bicuspid aortic valve stenosis with first- and new-generation bioprostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗二叶主动脉瓣狭窄的第一代和第二代生物瓣:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2020 Jan 1;298:76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.09.003. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
4
Comparison of procedural, clinical and valve performance results of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic stenosis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗二叶式主动脉瓣与三叶式主动脉瓣狭窄患者的手术过程、临床和瓣膜性能结果比较。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Mar 1;254:69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.12.013. Epub 2017 Dec 9.
5
Association Between Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid vs Tricuspid Aortic Stenosis and Mortality or Stroke.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗二叶式主动脉瓣与三叶式主动脉瓣狭窄与死亡率或卒中性事件的相关性。
JAMA. 2019 Jun 11;321(22):2193-2202. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.7108.
6
[Impact of bicuspid aortic valve or tricuspid aortic valve on hemodynamics and left ventricular reverse remodeling in patients after transcatheter aortic valve replacement].[二叶式主动脉瓣或三叶式主动脉瓣对经导管主动脉瓣置换术后患者血流动力学及左心室逆向重构的影响]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2022 Dec 24;50(12):1193-1200. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20221104-00865.
7
Determinants of paravalvular leakage following transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic stenosis.二叶式和三叶式主动脉瓣狭窄患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术后瓣周漏的决定因素
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Feb 14. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeab011.
8
Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术的二叶式主动脉瓣狭窄患者:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Mar 16;9:794850. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.794850. eCollection 2022.
9
Outcome of paravalvular leak repair after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with a balloon-expandable prosthesis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术使用球囊扩张式人工瓣膜后瓣周漏修补的结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Feb 15;89(3):462-468. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26570. Epub 2016 May 24.
10
Safety and efficacy of minimalist transcatheter aortic valve implantation using a new-generation balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve in bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves.使用新一代球囊扩张式经导管心脏瓣膜在二叶式和三叶式主动脉瓣中进行微创经导管主动脉瓣植入的安全性和有效性。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2021 Dec;110(12):1993-2006. doi: 10.1007/s00392-021-01935-7. Epub 2021 Sep 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Paravalvular Leak After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Results From 3600 Patients.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后瓣周漏:3600例患者的结果
Ann Thorac Surg. 2025 May;119(5):1037-1044. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2025.01.012. Epub 2025 Jan 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with bicuspid valve morphology: a roadmap towards standardization.二叶式瓣膜形态患者的经导管主动脉瓣植入术:迈向标准化的路线图。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2023 Jan;20(1):52-67. doi: 10.1038/s41569-022-00734-5. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
2
Comparison of Balloon-Expandable Valve and Self-Expandable Valve in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Patient-Specific Numerical Study.经导管主动脉瓣置换术中球囊扩张瓣膜与自膨胀瓣膜的比较:一项基于患者特异性的数值研究。
J Biomech Eng. 2022 Oct 1;144(10). doi: 10.1115/1.4054332.
3
Propensity-Matched 1-Year Outcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Bicuspid and Tricuspid Patients.
经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗低危二叶式和三叶式主动脉瓣患者的 1 年倾向性匹配结局。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Mar 14;15(5):511-522. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.10.027.
4
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): Recent updates.经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR):最新进展。
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2021 Nov-Dec;69:73-83. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2021.11.003. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
5
Percutaneous management of paravalvular leaks.经皮瓣周漏的处理。
Heart. 2022 Jun 10;108(13):1005-1011. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2021-319159.
6
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in bicuspid valves: The synergistic effects of eccentric and incomplete stent deployment.经导管主动脉瓣置换术在二叶瓣中的应用:偏心和不完全支架展开的协同效应。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021 Sep;121:104621. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104621. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
7
Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: Updated Endpoint Definitions for Aortic Valve Clinical Research.瓣膜学术研究联合会 3:主动脉瓣临床研究更新终点定义。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Jun 1;77(21):2717-2746. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.02.038. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
8
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗二叶式主动脉瓣狭窄。
Circulation. 2021 Mar 9;143(10):1043-1061. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.048048. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
9
Balloon Versus Self-Expandable Valve for the Treatment of Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis: Insights From the BEAT International Collaborative Registrys.球囊瓣膜与自膨式瓣膜治疗二叶式主动脉瓣狭窄:BEAT国际协作注册研究的见解
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jul;13(7):e008714. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008714. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
10
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic Valves From the STS/ACC TVT Registry.来自STS/ACC TVT注册研究的二叶式与三叶式主动脉瓣经导管主动脉瓣置换术
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Aug 10;13(15):1749-1759. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.03.022. Epub 2020 May 27.