Suppr超能文献

椎体骨折后骨质疏松症的筛查和治疗率。

Rates of osteoporosis screening and treatment following vertebral fracture.

机构信息

Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, 2 Riverside Circle, Roanoke, VA 24016, USA.

Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, 2 Riverside Circle, Roanoke, VA 24016, USA; Carilion Clinic, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 2331 Franklin Rd SW, Roanoke, VA 24014, USA.

出版信息

Spine J. 2019 Mar;19(3):411-417. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.08.004. Epub 2018 Aug 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Osteoporosis remains an underrecognized and undertreated disease entity in the orthopaedic setting, accounting for substantial long-term morbidity and mortality. Osteoporosis is often not diagnosed or treated until multiple fractures have occurred. Vertebral compression fractures are the most common sentinel fracture, providing an opportunity to intervene with antiresorptive therapy before more debilitating fractures occur. Little data has been published on osteoporosis screening and treatment following vertebral fractures. Further elucidation of the osteoporosis care gap in these patients is warranted.

PURPOSE

To demonstrate the current state of post vertebral fracture osteoporosis management at a large tertiary care center with no established secondary fracture prevention program.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

A large tertiary care hospital or one of its affiliated community hospitals.

PATIENT SAMPLE

All 2,933 patients, 50 years of age or older, who presented to an emergency department with a new vertebral fracture between 2008 and 2014.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The physiological measures are rates of new fractures within 2 years following first vertebral fracture.

PATIENT CARE METRICS

Post vertebral fracture rates of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) testing, calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and pharmacotherapy for osteoporosis within 1 year postfracture, and more than 1 year postfracture. Linear trend of the rate of new antiosteoporosis pharmacotherapy among previously antiosteoporosis medication naive patients within 1 year of fracture over time from 2008 to 2014.

METHODS

All patients aged 50 years or older presenting to an emergency department with a vertebral fracture between 2008 and 2014 were included. Only an individual's first documented vertebral fracture was considered. Individuals were assessed for DXA screening, calcium and vitamin D supplementation, treatment with an antiosteoporosis medication, and additional fractures following incident vertebral fracture. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics and a simple logistic regression. No specific funding was provided for this study. The authors of this study report no relevant financial conflicts of interests or associated biases.

RESULTS

Between 2008 and 2014, 2,933 unique patients were seen at an included emergency department for one or more vertebral fracture encounters. Ninety-eight percent did not receive a DXA scan within the preceding 2 years or 1 year following fracture. Seven percent of patients were started on antiresorptive therapy after their fracture, with 341 (5%) starting within 1 year of fracture and 211 (2%) starting thereafter. Twenty-one percent (n=616) had taken an antiresorptive medication before their fracture. Seventy three percent (n=2,128) were never prescribed antiresorptive therapy. Treatment rates slightly decreased over time. Thirty eight percent of patients presenting with a vertebral fracture (n=1,115) went on to develop a second fragility fracture within 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

In the absence of a specific local program to improve secondary fracture prevention following minimal trauma spinal fractures, recognition and treatment of osteoporosis in patients at this institution remained dismal over time despite numerous calls to action on the topic in the orthopaedic literature and elsewhere. Undertreatment of osteoporosis puts patients at increased risk of incurring additional fractures. Within 2 years, 38% of the patients in this sample developed an additional fragility fracture. This study demonstrates a profound post vertebral fracture osteoporosis care gap.

摘要

背景

骨质疏松症在骨科环境中仍然是一种未被充分认识和治疗的疾病实体,导致大量长期的发病率和死亡率。骨质疏松症通常直到发生多次骨折后才被诊断或治疗。椎体压缩性骨折是最常见的哨兵骨折,为在发生更虚弱的骨折之前使用抗吸收药物治疗提供了机会。关于椎体骨折后骨质疏松症的筛查和治疗,发表的数据很少。有必要进一步阐明这些患者的骨质疏松症护理差距。

目的

展示在没有既定的二级骨折预防计划的大型三级护理中心,在新诊断为椎体骨折后的骨质疏松症管理现状。

研究设计

回顾性队列研究。

地点

一家大型三级医院或其附属社区医院。

患者样本

2008 年至 2014 年间,在急诊科就诊时因新发椎体骨折而年龄在 50 岁或以上的所有 2,933 例患者。

结局测量

两年内新发骨折的生理指标。

患者护理指标

椎体骨折后一年内进行双能 X 线吸收测定(DXA)检查、钙和维生素 D 补充以及骨质疏松症药物治疗的情况,以及骨折后一年以上的情况。2008 年至 2014 年期间,随着时间的推移,首次骨折前接受过骨质疏松症药物治疗的患者中,1 年内新接受抗骨质疏松症药物治疗的比率呈线性趋势。

方法

纳入 2008 年至 2014 年间在急诊科就诊的年龄在 50 岁或以上的所有因椎体骨折就诊的患者。仅考虑患者的首次记录的椎体骨折。评估患者的 DXA 筛查、钙和维生素 D 补充、抗骨质疏松症药物治疗以及骨折后的其他骨折情况。统计分析包括描述性统计和简单逻辑回归。这项研究没有专门的资金支持。该研究的作者报告没有相关的财务利益冲突或相关的偏见。

结果

2008 年至 2014 年间,共有 2933 名患者在纳入的急诊科因一次或多次椎体骨折就诊。98%的患者在骨折前的 2 年内或 1 年内未接受 DXA 扫描。7%的患者在骨折后接受了抗吸收治疗,其中 341 例(5%)在骨折后 1 年内开始治疗,211 例(2%)在此后开始治疗。21%(n=616)在骨折前服用过抗吸收药物。73%(n=2128)从未接受过抗吸收药物治疗。治疗率随着时间的推移略有下降。38%(n=1115)的椎体骨折患者在 2 年内又发生了第二处脆性骨折。

结论

在没有专门的地方方案来改善轻微创伤性脊柱骨折后的二级骨折预防的情况下,尽管在骨科文献和其他地方多次呼吁关注这一问题,但随着时间的推移,该机构对骨质疏松症的认识和治疗仍然不佳。骨质疏松症的治疗不足使患者发生其他骨折的风险增加。在 2 年内,该样本中的 38%的患者发生了另一处脆性骨折。这项研究表明存在严重的椎体骨折后骨质疏松症护理差距。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验