• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国性别失衡背景下基于态度结构理论的重男轻女观念再审视

Re-examination of son-preference based on attitude structure theory under the background of gender imbalance in China.

作者信息

Shang Zijuan, Chi Baihui, Liu Ze

机构信息

School of Marxism, Chang'an University, Xi'an, China.

School of Humanities, Chang'an University, Xi'an, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 4;13:1051638. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1051638. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1051638
PMID:36687922
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9848308/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The gender imbalance in China has a long history, and the consequences have begun to emerge, threatening sustainable population development. Against the backdrop of a persistently high sex ratio at birth, the paper introduces the theory of attitude structure to construct an analytical framework explaining the influencing factors of son preference and re-examining the son preference culture.

METHODS

Based on the micro-level data from Jiangxi, Guangxi, Guizhou, and Shaanxi Province, this paper adopts a binary logistics model to analyzes the impacts of three cognitive factors on son preference.

RESULTS

The results show that surname inheritance, the utility of elderly care, and the social value in the boy utility evaluation are the main influencing factors in the preference for a son. Social gender assessment, perception of gender imbalance, personal income, education level, health status, and the number of existing children individually correlate with son preference. After comparing the two factors of boy utility evaluation and gender imbalance perception, it is discovered that after China enters a gender-imbalanced society, the perception of gender imbalance effectively reduces the preference for sons, and the son preference is the result of rational choice in people's fertility process.

DISCUSSION

Based on the above research, the paper proposes policy recommendations at both macro and micro levels from the standpoint of public governance.

摘要

引言

中国的性别失衡由来已久,其后果已开始显现,威胁到人口的可持续发展。在出生性别比持续居高不下的背景下,本文引入态度结构理论构建一个分析框架,用以解释重男轻女观念的影响因素并重新审视重男轻女文化。

方法

基于江西、广西、贵州和陕西省的微观层面数据,本文采用二元逻辑模型分析三种认知因素对重男轻女观念的影响。

结果

结果表明,姓氏传承、养老效用以及男孩效用评价中的社会价值是重男轻女观念的主要影响因素。社会性别评价、性别失衡认知、个人收入、教育水平、健康状况以及现有子女数量分别与重男轻女观念相关。在比较男孩效用评价和性别失衡认知这两个因素后发现,中国进入性别失衡社会后,性别失衡认知有效降低了对男孩的偏好,重男轻女观念是人们生育过程中理性选择的结果。

讨论

基于上述研究,本文从公共治理的角度提出了宏观和微观层面的政策建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57dd/9848308/6a696a472c63/fpsyg-13-1051638-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57dd/9848308/6a696a472c63/fpsyg-13-1051638-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57dd/9848308/6a696a472c63/fpsyg-13-1051638-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Re-examination of son-preference based on attitude structure theory under the background of gender imbalance in China.中国性别失衡背景下基于态度结构理论的重男轻女观念再审视
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 4;13:1051638. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1051638. eCollection 2022.
2
The effect of sex preference on subsequent fertility in two provinces of China.中国两个省份性别偏好对后续生育的影响。
Asia Pac Popul J. 1992 Dec;7(4):25-40.
3
Effect of son preference and population policy on sex ratios at birth in two provinces of China.中国两个省份的重男轻女观念和人口政策对出生性别比的影响。
J Biosoc Sci. 1993 Oct;25(4):509-21. doi: 10.1017/s002193200002188x.
4
Sex preference and its effect on family size and child welfare.性别偏好及其对家庭规模和儿童福利的影响。
Draper Fund Rep. 1982 Dec(11):22-5.
5
Sex preference and fertility in Peninsular Malaysia.马来西亚半岛的性别偏好与生育情况
Stud Fam Plann. 1994 May-Jun;25(3):137-48.
6
Son Preference and the Reproductive Behavior of Rural-Urban Migrant Women of Childbearing Age in China: Empirical Evidence from a Cross-Sectional Data.男孩偏好与中国城乡流动育龄妇女的生育行为:基于横截面数据的经验证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 6;17(9):3221. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093221.
7
Fertility Intention, Son Preference, and Second Childbirth: Survey Findings from Shaanxi Province of China.生育意愿、重男轻女观念与生育二胎情况:来自中国陕西省的调查结果
Soc Indic Res. 2016 Feb;125(3):935-953. doi: 10.1007/s11205-015-0875-z. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
8
Dr. Gu Baochang speaks out on son preference in China.顾宝昌博士就中国的重男轻女现象发声。
China Popul Today. 1995 Aug;12(3-4):27-8.
9
Roots of sex preference.性别偏好的根源。
Ingu Pogon Nonjip. 1982 Dec;2(2):127-44.
10
Fertility impact of sex composition and sequence among Korean women: an exploratory study.韩国女性中子女性别构成及出生顺序对生育力的影响:一项探索性研究。
Ingu Pogon Nonjip. 1984 Jul;4(1):161-76.

引用本文的文献

1
Socioeconomic factors and sex effects of postpartum maternal depression on offspring internalizing symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.产后母亲抑郁对后代内化症状的社会经济因素及性别影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
BMC Med. 2025 Feb 6;23(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-03877-7.
2
Will a government subsidy increase couples' further fertility intentions? A real-world study from a large-scale online survey in Eastern China.政府补贴会增加夫妻的再生育意愿吗?一项来自中国东部大规模在线调查的实证研究。
Hum Reprod Open. 2024 Sep 17;2024(4):hoae055. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoae055. eCollection 2024.
3
Parental involvement in school and school victimization in Taiwan: The mediating role of quality of student-teacher relationships.

本文引用的文献

1
On the Relationship Between the Marriage Squeeze and the Quality of Life of Rural Men in China.论中国农村男性婚姻挤压与生活质量的关系
Am J Mens Health. 2017 May;11(3):702-710. doi: 10.1177/1557988316681220. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
2
Son preference and household income in rural China.男孩偏好与中国农村家庭收入。
J Dev Stud. 2010;46(10):1786-1805. doi: 10.1080/00220388.2010.492948.
台湾地区家长对学校事务的参与及校园受侵害情况:师生关系质量的中介作用
Behav Sci Law. 2025 Jan-Feb;43(1):61-74. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2696. Epub 2024 Sep 14.
4
Profile and mental health characterization of childhood overprotection/overcontrol experiences among Chinese university students: a nationwide survey.中国大学生童年期过度保护/过度控制经历的特征及心理健康状况:一项全国性调查
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Oct 16;14:1238254. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1238254. eCollection 2023.