Sabri Hamoun, Wang Hom-Lay
Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2023 Apr;25(2):284-302. doi: 10.1111/cid.13177. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
Over the past decades, there has been an increase in research publications focusing on peri-implantitis. When facing limited healthcare resources, bibliometric analyses can guide researchers and funding parties toward areas where reallocation or more focus on research activity is warranted. The main objective of this study was to identify the trends of the top 100 cited articles on peri-implantitis research as the first study of its kind.
A Web of Science search, using the keywords "peri-implantitis or periimplantitis" was built to create a database of the most-cited articles. Articles were ranked by citation count and screened by two independent reviewers. The bibliometric characteristics of the studies were gathered and analyzed using several bibliometric software. Author collaborations, author clusters, and keyword co-occurrence network analyses were also performed. The correlation between the citation count and the age of each article was tested.
The top 100 cited papers were published from 1994 to 2018 and the total citation counts ranged from 119 to 972 with 244.5 citations/paper on average. There was no correlation between the age of the articles and the citation count (p-value = 0.67). 21% of the studies consisted of prospective clinical studies. 35% of the papers focused on treatment and prevention of peri-implantitis while 65% concerned epidemiology. The top three most prolific countries were Sweden (n = 31), Germany (n = 15), and Switzerland (n = 13). We found 12 authors who had greater than five publications on the list. Also, the most published journal was Clinical Oral Implants Research.
This study provides insight into the characteristics and quality of the most highly cited peri-implantitis literature. This revealed a deficiency in terms of the number of studies on treatment strategies as well as a higher level of evidence studies among the most- impactful papers on peri-implantitis at the moment.
在过去几十年中,专注于种植体周围炎的研究出版物有所增加。面对有限的医疗资源,文献计量分析可以引导研究人员和资助方关注那些有必要重新分配资源或更多关注研究活动的领域。本研究的主要目的是作为同类研究中的第一项,确定种植体周围炎研究中被引用次数最多的100篇文章的趋势。
利用关键词“peri-implantitis或periimplantitis”在科学网进行搜索,以创建被引用次数最多的文章数据库。文章按被引用次数排名,并由两名独立评审员进行筛选。使用多种文献计量软件收集并分析研究的文献计量特征。还进行了作者合作、作者聚类和关键词共现网络分析。测试了每篇文章的被引用次数与发表年份之间的相关性。
被引用次数最多的100篇论文发表于1994年至2018年,总被引用次数在119至972次之间,平均每篇论文被引用244.5次。文章发表年份与被引用次数之间没有相关性(p值 = 0.67)。21%的研究包括前瞻性临床研究。35%的论文关注种植体周围炎的治疗和预防,而65%涉及流行病学。发表论文最多的前三个国家是瑞典(n = 31)、德国(n = 15)和瑞士(n = 13)。我们发现有12位作者在该列表上发表了超过五篇论文。此外,发表论文最多的期刊是《临床口腔种植研究》。
本研究深入了解了被引用次数最多的种植体周围炎文献的特征和质量。这揭示了目前在治疗策略研究数量方面的不足,以及在关于种植体周围炎的最具影响力的论文中,高水平证据研究的缺乏。