Correlation between pretreatment and follow-up infarct volume using CT perfusion imaging: the Bayesian versus singular value decomposition method.

PURPOSE

Pretreatment ischemic core volume is conceptually equal to follow-up infarct volume (FIV) in patients with successful recanalization. However, there is sometimes an absolute volume difference (AD) between pretreatment core volume and FIV. The aim was to compare the AD values between the Bayesian and the singular value decomposition (SVD) methods with time from onset-to-imaging in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy.

METHODS

Consecutive AIS patients were included if they had the following: (1) anterior large vessel occlusion (internal carotid or middle cerebral artery); (2) within 24 h of onset; (3) pretreatment CT perfusion (CTP); (4) successful recanalization (mTICI ≥ 2b); and (5) 24-h diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). FIV was measured on 24-h DWI. The AD value between FIV and the pretreatment core volume was calculated for Bayesian and SVD methods. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (rho) was calculated as appropriate.

RESULTS

In the 47 patients enrolled (25 men; median age 78 years; median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, 22), the median time from onset-to-imaging and onset-to-recanalization was 136 and 220 min, respectively. Shorter onset-to-imaging time was correlated with a larger AD value, and more trend was seen in the SVD method (rho =  - 0.28, p = 0.05) compared with the Bayesian method (rho =  - 0.08). A larger pretreatment core volume was correlated with a larger AD value, and this tendency was slightly stronger for the SVD (rho = 0.63, p < 0.01) than for the Bayesian (rho = 0.32, p = 0.03) method.

CONCLUSIONS

The Bayesian method might be more correlated with FIV than the SVD method in patients with a large ischemic lesion immediately after stroke onset, but not perfect.