Gruppo Ricicla labs. - DiSAA - Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 2, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Gruppo Ricicla labs. - DiSAA - Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 2, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Apr 10;868:161500. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161500. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
Highly stabilized digestate from sewage sludge and digestate-derived ammonium sulphate (RFs), were used in a comparison with synthetic mineral fertilizers (SF) to crop maize in a three-year plot trial in open fields. RFs and SF were dosed to ensure the same amount of mineral N (ammonia-N). In doing so, plots fertilized with digestate received much more N (+185 kg ha of organic N) because digestate also contained organic N. The fate of nitrogen was studied by measuring mineral and organic N in soil at different depths, ammonia and NO emissions, and N uptake in crops. Soil analyses indicated that at one-meter depth there was no significant difference in nitrate content between RF, SF and Unfertilized plots during crop season indicating that more N dosed with digestate did not lead to extra nitrate leaching. Ammonia emissions and N content in plants and grains measured were also similar for both RF and SF. Measuring denitrification activity by using gene makers resulted in a higher denitrification activity for RF than SF. Nevertheless, NO measurements showed that SF emitted more NO than RF (although it was not statistically different) (7.59 ± 3.2 kgN ha for RF and 10.3 ± 6.8 kgN ha for SF), suggesting that probably the addition of organic matter with digestate to RF, increased the denitrification efficiency so that N production was favoured. Soil analyses, although were not able detecting N differences between SF and Rf after three years of cropping, revealed a statistical increasing of total carbon, suggesting that dosing digestate lead to carbon (and maybe N) accumulation in soil. Data seem to suggest that NO/N emission and organic N accumulation in soil can explain the fate of the extra N dosed (organic-N) in RF plots.
从污水污泥和消化衍生的铵硫酸盐(RFs)中获得的高度稳定的消化物,与合成矿物肥料(SF)一起,在三年的野外田间试验中用于种植玉米。RFs 和 SF 的剂量确保了相同量的矿物 N(氨氮)。这样,用消化物施肥的地块接收了更多的 N(+185 公斤公顷有机 N),因为消化物还含有有机 N。通过测量不同深度土壤中的矿质和有机 N、氨和 NO 排放以及作物中的 N 吸收,研究了氮的命运。土壤分析表明,在作物季节,RF、SF 和未施肥地块的一米深土壤中硝酸盐含量没有显著差异,表明用消化物施肥的更多 N 不会导致额外的硝酸盐淋失。RF 和 SF 的氨排放和植物及谷物中的 N 含量也相似。通过使用基因标记物测量反硝化活性,RF 的反硝化活性高于 SF。然而,NO 测量表明 SF 比 RF 排放更多的 NO(尽管没有统计学差异)(RF 为 7.59 ± 3.2 kgN ha,SF 为 10.3 ± 6.8 kgN ha),这表明可能是由于消化物中添加了有机物,增加了反硝化效率,从而有利于 N 的产生。尽管在三年的种植后,土壤分析未能检测到 SF 和 Rf 之间的 N 差异,但揭示了总碳的统计增加,表明施肥消化物导致了土壤中碳(可能还有 N)的积累。数据似乎表明,NO/N 排放和土壤中有机 N 积累可以解释 RF 地块中额外 N(有机-N)的去向。