Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia Aplicada, Laboratório de Ecologia de Formigas, Departamento de Ecologia e Conservação, Instituto de Ciências Naturais, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, Brazil.
Department of Earth, Ocean and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Ecology. 2023 Apr;104(4):e3975. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3975. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
Animals are integrated into the wider ecosystem via their foraging and behavior. The compensation hypothesis predicts that animals target their foraging efforts (i) toward nutrients that are scarce in the environment and (ii) toward nutrients that are not present in the usual diet of species, which varies across trophic levels. Understanding how foraging for resources varies locally, such as across habitat strata, and trophic levels will help to elucidate the links between the local environment and communities to the ecological functions that animals mediate. We examined whether the relative resource use of ants varies consistently along a habitat strata gradient and across trophic levels across Neotropical biomes. We placed 4500 baited tubes, each containing one of five liquid resources (sugar, amino acid, lipid, sodium, and distilled water) in one of three habitat strata (subterranean, epigaeic, and arboreal) across 60 transects in Amazon, Atlantic Forest, Caatinga, Cerrado, Pampa, and Pantanal biomes. We assessed the relative resource use of all ants across the habitat strata and among two different trophic groups across biomes. The relative preference for sugar increased from subterranean to arboreal strata in all biomes, while the relative preference for lipids decreased at this gradient in five biomes. We also found that in general sugar-consuming ants foraged more for sugar and less for lipids than predatory ants across biomes. Conversely, we found no consistency across biomes in nutrient preference of amino acid and sodium across habitat strata or trophic levels. Overall, our results indicate sugar limitation in the arboreal stratum and lipid limitation on the ground across biomes and that the trophic level of ants strongly determines their foraging efforts-possibly because ants try to fix their dietary nutrient imbalances. Hence, our findings suggest strong local niche partitioning of sugar and lipid use across habitat strata and trophic levels and that other large spatial scale processes influence the local amino acid and sodium dynamics.
动物通过觅食和行为与更广泛的生态系统相互作用。补偿假说预测,动物会将觅食努力(i)集中在环境中稀缺的营养物质上,(ii)集中在物种通常饮食中不存在的营养物质上,而这些营养物质在不同的营养层次上有所不同。了解资源在当地的觅食情况如何变化,例如跨越栖息地层次和营养层次,将有助于阐明当地环境与社区之间的联系,以及动物介导的生态功能。我们研究了蚂蚁在沿栖息地层次梯度和跨越新热带生物群落的营养层次的相对资源利用是否一致。我们在亚马逊、大西洋森林、卡廷加、塞拉多、潘塔纳尔和潘帕斯生物群落的 60 个横断面上,在三个栖息地层次(地下、地上和树上)的每个层次上放置了 4500 个装有五种液体资源(糖、氨基酸、脂质、钠和蒸馏水)之一的诱饵管。我们评估了所有蚂蚁在栖息地层次上的相对资源利用情况,以及在生物群落中的两个不同营养组中的相对资源利用情况。在所有生物群落中,糖的相对偏好从地下层到树冠层逐渐增加,而在五个生物群落中,脂质的相对偏好则在这个梯度上下降。我们还发现,一般来说,糖消耗蚂蚁比捕食性蚂蚁在跨生物群落的情况下更多地觅食糖,而更少地觅食脂质。相反,我们发现,在跨生物群落的情况下,氨基酸和钠的营养偏好在栖息地层次或营养层次上没有一致性。总的来说,我们的结果表明,在新热带生物群落中,树冠层存在糖限制,地面层存在脂质限制,而蚂蚁的营养层次强烈决定了它们的觅食努力,这可能是因为蚂蚁试图弥补其饮食中的营养失衡。因此,我们的研究结果表明,在跨栖息地层次和营养层次上,糖和脂质的利用存在强烈的局部生态位分化,而其他大空间尺度的过程则影响了当地的氨基酸和钠动态。