Kirchner Michelle, Ciccone Lucie, Sorenson Clyde, Youngsteadt Elsa
U.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Pollinating Insect-Biology, Management, Systematics Research Unit, Logan, Utah, United States of America.
Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 28;20(3):e0320380. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320380. eCollection 2025.
Resource and nutrient availability varies spatially and influences animal foraging patterns. Under the compensation hypothesis, animals should preferentially forage for the most limiting nutrient in the environment. Animal nutrient preferences have been well studied in the tropics, where terrestrial and arboreal fauna are clearly differentiated and limited by different nutrients. In temperate forests, vertical stratification of the fauna may be less pronounced and its role in foraging ecology is poorly understood. Here, we examine nutrient preference patterns over a vertical gradient in temperate forests and nearby urban centers in North Carolina, USA. Using a bait-choice experiment and novel bait design, we measured ant community nutrient preferences in the canopy and on the ground of 83 trees across 14 sites and assessed ant diversity and community composition. Ant diversity did not differ across the vertical strata or habitat types, but species turnover altered community composition to create four distinct assemblages. In temperate forests, ants did not prefer a particular nutrient in either stratum, likely due to extensive foraging across strata. In urban habitats, however, ant nutrient preferences matched patterns well known from tropical systems: arboreal animals preferred protein, while terrestrial animals preferred carbohydrates. Rather than stratum-specific nutrient limitations, however, we attribute the differences in urban preference patterns to changes in native species' foraging intensity and the addition of uniquely urban species with specific nutrient preferences. These results underscore the necessity of testing ecological hypotheses across biomes and suggest that urbanization may produce established ecological patterns via novel mechanisms.
资源和养分的可利用性在空间上存在差异,并影响动物的觅食模式。根据补偿假说,动物应优先觅食环境中最具限制性的养分。在热带地区,动物的养分偏好已得到充分研究,那里的陆生和树栖动物群明显不同,且受不同养分的限制。在温带森林中,动物群的垂直分层可能不那么明显,其在觅食生态学中的作用也鲜为人知。在此,我们研究了美国北卡罗来纳州温带森林和附近城市中心垂直梯度上的养分偏好模式。通过诱饵选择实验和新颖的诱饵设计,我们测量了14个地点83棵树的树冠层和地面上蚂蚁群落的养分偏好,并评估了蚂蚁的多样性和群落组成。蚂蚁的多样性在垂直层次或栖息地类型之间没有差异,但物种更替改变了群落组成,形成了四个不同的组合。在温带森林中,蚂蚁在两个层次中都不偏好特定的养分,这可能是由于它们在不同层次间广泛觅食。然而,在城市栖息地,蚂蚁的养分偏好与热带系统中熟知的模式相符:树栖动物偏好蛋白质,而陆生动物偏好碳水化合物。然而,我们将城市偏好模式的差异归因于本地物种觅食强度的变化以及具有特定养分偏好的独特城市物种的加入,而非特定层次的养分限制。这些结果强调了在不同生物群落中检验生态假说的必要性,并表明城市化可能通过新机制产生既定的生态模式。