Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States.
Department of Anthropology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, United States.
Glob Public Health. 2022 Dec;17(12):3654-3669. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2022.2129720. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
The COVID-19 pandemic has created an unprecedented natural experiment in drug policy, treatment delivery, and harm reduction strategies by exposing wide variation in public health infrastructures and social safety nets around the world. Using qualitative data including ethnographic methods, questionnaires, and semi-structured interviews with people who use drugs (PWUD) and Delphi-method with experts from field sites spanning 13 different countries, this paper compares national responses to substance use during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Field data was collected by the Substance Use x COVID-19 (SU x COVID) Data Collaborative, an international network of social scientists, public health scientists, and community health practitioners convened to identify and contextualise health service delivery models and social protections that influence the health and wellbeing of PWUD during COVID-19. Findings suggest that countries with stronger social welfare systems pre-COVID introduced durable interventions targeting structural drivers of health. Countries with fragmented social service infrastructures implemented temporary initiatives for PWUD led by non-governmental organisations. The paper summarises the most successful early pandemic responses seen across countries and ends by calling for greater systemic investments in social protections for PWUD, diversion away from criminal-legal systems toward health interventions, and integrated harm reduction, treatment and recovery supports for PWUD.
COVID-19 大流行通过暴露全世界公共卫生基础设施和社会安全网的巨大差异,为药物政策、治疗提供和减少伤害策略创造了前所未有的自然实验。本文使用包括民族志方法、问卷调查和与吸毒者(PWUD)的半结构化访谈以及来自跨越 13 个不同国家的现场专家的德尔菲法在内的定性数据,比较了各国在 COVID-19 大流行第一波期间对药物使用的反应。实地数据由药物使用与 COVID-19(SU x COVID)数据协作组织收集,该组织是一个由社会科学家、公共卫生科学家和社区卫生从业者组成的国际网络,旨在确定和阐述影响 COVID-19 期间 PWUD 健康和福祉的卫生服务提供模式和社会保护措施。研究结果表明,在 COVID-19 之前拥有更强社会福利制度的国家针对健康的结构性驱动因素引入了持久的干预措施。社会服务基础设施支离破碎的国家为 PWUD 实施了由非政府组织牵头的临时举措。本文总结了各国在早期大流行应对中看到的最成功措施,最后呼吁为 PWUD 提供更大的社会保护系统投资,从刑事法律制度转向卫生干预措施,并为 PWUD 提供综合的减少伤害、治疗和康复支持。