• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Popular… to a Point: The Enduring Political Challenges of the Public Option.广受欢迎……但也存在问题:全民医保计划的持续政治挑战。
Milbank Q. 2023 Mar;101(1):26-47. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12599. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
2
The Affordable Care Act's Missing Consensus: Values, Attitudes, and Experiences Associated with Competing Health Reform Preferences.平价医疗法案的缺失共识:与竞争医疗改革偏好相关的价值观、态度和经验。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2020 Oct 1;45(5):729-755. doi: 10.1215/03616878-8543222.
3
Polarized stakeholders and institutional vulnerabilities: the enduring politics of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.两极分化的利益相关者与制度漏洞:《患者保护与平价医疗法案》中持久的政治问题
Clin Ther. 2015 Apr 1;37(4):720-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.03.005. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
4
Collision course? Donald Trump, Paul Ryan, and the fate of Medicare.《碰撞的轨迹?唐纳德·特朗普、保罗·瑞安和医疗保险的命运》
J Aging Soc Policy. 2018 May-Jun;30(3-4):244-258. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2018.1462682. Epub 2018 May 30.
5
What Does the State Innovation Model Experiment Tell Us About States' Capacity to Implement Complex Health Reforms?国家创新模式试验告诉了我们什么关于各州实施复杂医疗改革的能力?
Milbank Q. 2022 Jun;100(2):525-561. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12559. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
6
The Paradoxical Politics of Community Health Centers from the Great Society to the COVID-19 Pandemic.《从伟大社会到新冠疫情:社区卫生中心的矛盾政治》。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2023 Jun 1;48(3):379-404. doi: 10.1215/03616878-10358724.
7
Implementing the Affordable Care Act: The Promise and Limits of Health Care Reform.实施《平价医疗法案》:医疗保健改革的前景与局限
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2016 Aug;41(4):803-26. doi: 10.1215/03616878-3620953. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
8
The Affordable Care Act's Enduring Resilience.平价医疗法案的持久韧性。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2020 Aug 1;45(4):609-616. doi: 10.1215/03616878-8255529.
9
The Ten Years' War: Politics, Partisanship, And The ACA.《十年之战:政治、党派之争与《平价医疗法案》》
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Mar;39(3):471-478. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01444.
10
The political challenges that may undermine health reform.可能破坏卫生改革的政治挑战。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jul;29(7):1288-92. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0438.

引用本文的文献

1
Affordability trade-offs following a public option: learning from the Colorado Option.公共选择之后的可负担性权衡:借鉴科罗拉多州医保方案
Health Aff Sch. 2025 Aug 28;3(8):qxaf160. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf160. eCollection 2025 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Tracking Turnover Among Health Care Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-sectional Study.追踪 COVID-19 大流行期间卫生保健工作者的离职情况:一项横断面研究。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Apr 8;3(4):e220371. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.0371. eCollection 2022 Apr.
2
Automatic Insurance Policies - Important Tools for Preventing Coverage Loss.自动保险政策——防止保险范围丧失的重要工具。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Feb 3;386(5):408-411. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2114189. Epub 2022 Jan 29.
3
State Public Option Plans - Too Modest to Improve Affordability?州公共选择计划——力度太小不足以提高可承受性?
N Engl J Med. 2021 Sep 16;385(12):1057-1059. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2111356. Epub 2021 Sep 11.
4
Health Insurance Loss during COVID-19 May Increase Support for Universal Health Coverage.新冠疫情期间医疗保险流失可能会增加对全民健康覆盖的支持。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2022 Feb 1;47(1):1-25. doi: 10.1215/03616878-9417428.
5
Addressing Consolidation in Health Care Markets.应对医疗保健市场的合并问题。
JAMA. 2021 Mar 9;325(10):927-928. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.0038.
6
Between the Waves: Building Power for a Public Option.《浪潮之间:为公共选择积聚力量》
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2021 Aug 1;46(4):535-547. doi: 10.1215/03616878-8970739.
7
Affective polarization, local contexts and public opinion in America.情感极化、局部语境与美国舆论
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Jan;5(1):28-38. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-01012-5. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
8
Lingering Legacies: Public Attitudes about Medicaid Beneficiaries and Work Requirements.遗留问题:公众对医疗补助受益人和工作要求的态度。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2021 Apr 1;46(2):305-355. doi: 10.1215/03616878-8802198.
9
The Affordable Care Act's Missing Consensus: Values, Attitudes, and Experiences Associated with Competing Health Reform Preferences.平价医疗法案的缺失共识:与竞争医疗改革偏好相关的价值观、态度和经验。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2020 Oct 1;45(5):729-755. doi: 10.1215/03616878-8543222.
10
COVID-19 and Racial/Ethnic Disparities.新冠病毒病与种族/民族差异
JAMA. 2020 Jun 23;323(24):2466-2467. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.8598.

广受欢迎……但也存在问题:全民医保计划的持续政治挑战。

Popular… to a Point: The Enduring Political Challenges of the Public Option.

机构信息

Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health.

National Committee for Quality Assurance, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

Milbank Q. 2023 Mar;101(1):26-47. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12599. Epub 2023 Jan 24.

DOI:10.1111/1468-0009.12599
PMID:36692967
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10037684/
Abstract

Policy Points A decade after failing to make it into the Affordable Care Act, the public option reemerged as a health reform goal at both the national and state levels, with polls reporting strong, bipartisan support. A 2020 poll that probed both support for one public option approach (Medicare "buy-in") and attitudes toward government suggests that differences in these attitudes could plague reform advocates' efforts. Although the COVID-19 pandemic viscerally highlighted the need for a more coherent health care system-including universal coverage-other recent evolutions in the broader US political context could undermine reform.

摘要

政策要点

平价医疗法案实施十年后,公共选择作为一项国家和州级的医疗改革目标再次出现,民意调查显示两党对此都有强烈的支持。2020 年的一项民意调查探究了公众对一种公共选择方案(“医保购买”)的支持程度以及对政府的态度,表明这些态度上的差异可能会影响改革倡导者的努力。尽管 COVID-19 大流行强烈地凸显了建立一个更具凝聚力的医疗体系(包括全民覆盖)的必要性,但美国更广泛政治背景下的其他近期演变可能会破坏改革。