Jeelani Wajiha, Harhay Rana, Wrotniak Brian H, Hargest Thomas, Teo Amanda, Abdul-Aziz Rabheh
Pediatrics, University at Buffalo, John R. Oishei Children's Hospital, Buffalo, USA.
Pediatric Emergency Medicine, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, USA.
Cureus. 2022 Dec 21;14(12):e32785. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32785. eCollection 2022 Dec.
Objective This study aims to compare clinical and laboratory features between Lyme arthritis (LA) and oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (oligoarticular JIA) by examining several potential predictors in pediatric patients. This study also aims to improve and increase awareness of ways to detect LA and oligoarticular JIA in pediatric patients who present with clinical features of joint pain. Methods A medical chart review was conducted among pediatric patients diagnosed with LA or oligoarticular JIA at John R. Oishei Children's Hospital of Buffalo between January 2014 and September 2018. Patients' diagnoses were identified using the International Classification of Disease 10th Revision code for LA (ICD 10 code A69.23) and oligoarticular JIA (ICD 10 code M08.40). Patients with LA were only included in this study if they (1) exhibited arthritis, (2) tested positive for Lyme antibodies, (3) indicated a positive western blot (WB) of five or more out of 10 proteins by IgG antibodies or at least two of three proteins by IgM antibodies, and (4) at the age of 16 or below at the time of diagnosis. Patients with oligoarticular JIA were included in this study if they (1) exhibited arthritis affecting one to four joints for at least six weeks in the first six months of diagnosis and (2) are at the age of 16 or below at the time of diagnosis after ruling out LA and reactive arthritis. In this study, clinical presentations, physical exam findings during initial healthcare visits, and demographics including age, sex, and race of patients were obtained. In addition, laboratory results including white blood cells (WBCs), hemoglobin (Hgb), platelet count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP) level, Lyme antibodies through enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and WB, synovial fluid analysis for red blood cells (RBCs), nucleated cells, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for DNA were also collected and analyzed. Results In our data, ESR and CRP were significantly higher in LA compared to oligoarticular JIA (P=0.0053 and 0.0005, respectively). The mean WBC in the synovial joint fluid was significantly higher in LA compared to oligoarticular JIA (P=0.002). Conclusion LA shares features with oligoarticular JIA. This overlap prevents the creation of a clinically useful predictive model for LA. Therefore, Lyme testing should be performed on all patients presenting with monoarticular and oligoarticular arthritis. In addition, ESR, CRP, and WBC in the synovial joint fluid were significantly higher in LA compared to oligoarticular JIA in our findings. While this difference is not definitive by any means, it may help distinguish between the two in cases where the diagnosis is not clear-cut, and the values of ESR, CRP, and WBC in the joint aspirate may help guide clinical judgment in cases that lack a definitive diagnosis.
目的 本研究旨在通过检查儿科患者的几个潜在预测指标,比较莱姆关节炎(LA)和少关节型幼年特发性关节炎(少关节型JIA)的临床和实验室特征。本研究还旨在提高对出现关节疼痛临床特征的儿科患者中检测LA和少关节型JIA方法的认识。方法 对2014年1月至2018年9月在布法罗约翰·R·奥谢儿童医院被诊断为LA或少关节型JIA的儿科患者进行病历回顾。使用国际疾病分类第10版中LA的编码(ICD - 10编码A69.23)和少关节型JIA的编码(ICD - 10编码M08.40)来确定患者的诊断。LA患者仅在以下情况下纳入本研究:(1)出现关节炎;(2)莱姆抗体检测呈阳性;(3)通过IgG抗体显示10种蛋白质中有5种或更多种的免疫印迹(WB)阳性,或通过IgM抗体显示3种蛋白质中的至少2种阳性;(4)诊断时年龄在16岁及以下。少关节型JIA患者在排除LA和反应性关节炎后,若符合以下条件则纳入本研究:(1)在诊断的前六个月中,出现影响1至4个关节的关节炎至少六周;(2)诊断时年龄在16岁及以下。在本研究中,获取了患者的临床表现、初次就诊时的体格检查结果以及包括年龄、性别和种族在内的人口统计学信息。此外,还收集并分析了实验室结果,包括白细胞(WBC)、血红蛋白(Hgb)、血小板计数、红细胞沉降率(ESR)、C反应蛋白(CRP)水平、通过酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)和WB检测的莱姆抗体、滑膜液中红细胞(RBC)、有核细胞的分析以及DNA的聚合酶链反应(PCR)。结果 在我们的数据中,LA患者的ESR和CRP显著高于少关节型JIA患者(分别为P = 0.0053和0.0005)。LA患者滑膜关节液中的平均WBC显著高于少关节型JIA患者(P = 0.002)。结论 LA与少关节型JIA有共同特征。这种重叠使得无法创建一个对LA临床有用的预测模型。因此,应对所有出现单关节和少关节关节炎的患者进行莱姆检测。此外,在我们的研究结果中,LA患者滑膜关节液中的ESR、CRP和WBC显著高于少关节型JIA患者。虽然这种差异绝不是决定性的,但在诊断不明确的情况下可能有助于区分两者,并且关节穿刺液中ESR、CRP和WBC的值可能有助于在缺乏明确诊断的情况下指导临床判断。