• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

由政策倡导文献提供信息的选民驱动型卫生政策。

Constituent-driven health policy informed by policy advocacy literature.

作者信息

Figueroa Roger, Verma Rahul

机构信息

Division of Nutritional Sciences, College of Human Ecology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.

出版信息

Transl Behav Med. 2023 May 13;13(5):338-342. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibac116.

DOI:10.1093/tbm/ibac116
PMID:36694934
Abstract

In this position paper, a theoretical framework is proposed to formulate engaged, evidence-based health policy based on the priorities of constituents. An initial literature review was conducted to gain insight on the gaps in knowledge. Three emergent domains were identified: advocacy, research, and policymaking. The inputs and intermediates to the final output (equitable, evidence-based health policy outcomes) were identified and further elaborated upon in each corresponding section of the paper. Additionally, the main objective of each domain based on the literature review and the implications of each step were noted. Researchers have been identified as crucial to the education of policymakers to ultimately produce informed, evidence-based policy. Community advocates and researchers must attempt to advocate for policy issues as the ultimate role of policymakers in this process necessitates effective engagement to promote political will in the policymaking process. To do so, community advocates must scale-up from the individual to coalitions with strong leadership. In conjunction with a policy champion, these efforts by constituents (community advocates and researchers) would result in the most effective modes of policy development and implementation. The Constituent-driven Policy Advocacy Model (CPAM) introduced in this paper creates the potential for a new precedent in policymaking, in which advocacy, community engagement, evidence synthesis and evaluation, as well as science communication are common practices, leading to more sensitive, targeted, and equitable policy outcomes.

摘要

在本立场文件中,我们提出了一个理论框架,以根据选民的优先事项制定积极参与、基于证据的卫生政策。我们进行了初步的文献综述,以深入了解知识空白。确定了三个新兴领域:宣传、研究和政策制定。在论文的每个相应部分中,我们确定并进一步阐述了最终产出(公平、基于证据的卫生政策成果)的投入和中间环节。此外,基于文献综述指出了每个领域的主要目标以及每一步骤的影响。研究人员被认为对于教育政策制定者以最终制定明智、基于证据的政策至关重要。社区倡导者和研究人员必须努力倡导政策问题,因为政策制定者在这一过程中的最终作用需要有效的参与,以促进政策制定过程中的政治意愿。为此,社区倡导者必须从个人层面扩大到具有强大领导力的联盟。与政策支持者一起,选民(社区倡导者和研究人员)的这些努力将产生最有效的政策制定和实施模式。本文介绍的选民驱动政策倡导模型(CPAM)为政策制定创造了一个新的先例,其中宣传、社区参与、证据综合与评估以及科学传播成为常见做法,从而带来更敏感、更有针对性和更公平的政策成果。

相似文献

1
Constituent-driven health policy informed by policy advocacy literature.由政策倡导文献提供信息的选民驱动型卫生政策。
Transl Behav Med. 2023 May 13;13(5):338-342. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibac116.
2
Enhancing evidence use in public health nutrition policymaking: theoretical insights from a New Zealand case study.加强公共卫生营养政策制定中的证据应用:来自新西兰案例研究的理论见解
Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Nov 25;14(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0154-8.
3
Enhancing evidence informed policymaking in complex health systems: lessons from multi-site collaborative approaches.加强复杂卫生系统中的循证决策:多地点协作方法的经验教训。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Mar 17;14:20. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0089-0.
4
Improving maternal and child health policymaking processes in Nigeria: an assessment of policymakers' needs, barriers and facilitators of evidence-informed policymaking.改善尼日利亚母婴健康政策制定过程:对政策制定者基于证据的政策制定的需求、障碍和促进因素的评估
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Jul 12;15(Suppl 1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0217-5.
5
Examining the use of health systems and policy research in the health policymaking process in Israel: views of researchers.审视以色列卫生政策制定过程中卫生系统与政策研究的应用:研究人员的观点
Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Sep 1;14(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0139-7.
6
Exploring health researchers' perceptions of policymaking in Argentina: a qualitative study.探索阿根廷卫生研究人员对政策制定的看法:一项定性研究。
Health Policy Plan. 2014 Sep;29 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii40-9. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czu071.
7
Enhancing evidence-informed policymaking in medicine and healthcare: stakeholder involvement in the Commons Project for rare diseases in Japan.加强医学和医疗保健领域基于证据的政策制定:日本罕见病共同项目中的利益相关者参与
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Nov 29;9(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00515-5.
8
Incorporating research evidence into decision-making processes: researcher and decision-maker perceptions from five low- and middle-income countries.将研究证据纳入决策过程:来自五个低收入和中等收入国家的研究者与决策者的看法
Health Res Policy Syst. 2015 Nov 30;13:70. doi: 10.1186/s12961-015-0059-y.
9
New trends in science communication fostering evidence-informed policymaking.促进基于证据的决策制定的科学传播新趋势。
Open Res Eur. 2023 Oct 24;2:78. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.14769.2. eCollection 2022.
10
Accessing evidence to inform public health policy: a study to enhance advocacy.获取用于为公共卫生政策提供信息的证据:一项加强宣传的研究
Public Health. 2015 Jun;129(6):698-704. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.02.016. Epub 2015 Mar 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Advocacy efforts of the Society of Behavioral Medicine: a 6-year update.行为医学学会的倡导工作:6 年进展更新。
Transl Behav Med. 2023 Nov 5;13(11):809-816. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibad042.