Free Daniel B, Syndergaard Ian, Pigg Adam C, Muceli Silvia, Thompson-Westra Johanna, Mente Karin, Maurer Carine W, Haubenberger Dietrich, Hallett Mark, Farina Dario, Charles Steven K
Mechanical Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, United States.
Electrical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
J Neurophysiol. 2023 Jan 25;129(3):524-40. doi: 10.1152/jn.00398.2022.
Although Essential Tremor is one of the most common movement disorders, current treatment options are relatively limited. Peripheral tremor suppression methods have shown potential, but we do not currently know which muscles are most responsible for patients' tremor, making it difficult to optimize suppression methods. The purpose of this study was to quantify the relationships between the tremorogenic activity in muscles throughout the upper limb. Muscle activity was recorded from the 15 major superficial upper-limb muscles in 24 subjects with Essential Tremor while they held various postures or made upper-limb movements. We calculated the coherence in the tremor band (4-12 Hz) between the activity of all muscle pairs and the time-varying phase difference between sufficiently coherent muscle pairs. Overall, the observed pattern somewhat mirrored functional relationships: agonistic muscle pairs were most coherent and in phase, whereas antagonist and unrelated muscle pairs exhibited less coherence and were either consistently in phase, consistently antiphase, consistently out of phase (unrelated pairs only), or else inconsistent. Patients exhibited significantly more coherence than control subjects (p<0.001) in the vast majority of muscle pairs (95 out of 105). Furthermore, differences between patients and controls were most pronounced among agonists; thus, the coherence pattern existing in control subjects was accentuated in patients with ET. We conclude that tremor-band activity is broadly distributed among the muscles of the upper limb, challenging efforts to determine which muscles are most responsible for a patient's tremor.
尽管特发性震颤是最常见的运动障碍之一,但目前的治疗选择相对有限。外周震颤抑制方法已显示出潜力,但我们目前尚不清楚哪些肌肉对患者的震颤最为关键,这使得优化抑制方法变得困难。本研究的目的是量化上肢各肌肉中震颤源性活动之间的关系。在24名特发性震颤患者保持各种姿势或进行上肢运动时,记录了15块上肢主要浅表肌肉的活动。我们计算了所有肌肉对活动之间在震颤频段(4 - 12赫兹)的相干性,以及相干性足够的肌肉对之间随时间变化的相位差。总体而言,观察到的模式在一定程度上反映了功能关系:拮抗肌对的相干性最强且相位相同,而拮抗肌对和不相关肌肉对的相干性较低,它们要么始终同相、始终反相、始终异相(仅不相关肌肉对),要么不一致。在绝大多数肌肉对(105对中的95对)中,患者表现出的相干性显著高于对照组(p < 0.001)。此外,患者与对照组之间的差异在拮抗肌中最为明显;因此,特发性震颤患者中对照组存在的相干模式被进一步强化。我们得出结论,震颤频段活动广泛分布于上肢肌肉中,这给确定哪些肌肉对患者的震颤最为关键的工作带来了挑战。