Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital AND Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2023 Apr 1;24(4):301-310. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003184. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
Standardized, consistent reporting of social determinants of health (SDOH) in studies on children with sepsis would allow for: 1) understanding the association of SDOH with illness severity and outcomes, 2) comparing populations and extrapolating study results, and 3) identification of potentially modifiable socioeconomic factors for policy makers. We, therefore, sought to determine how frequently data on SDOH were reported, which factors were collected and how these factors were defined in studies of sepsis in children.
We reviewed 106 articles (published between 2005 and 2020) utilized in a recent systematic review on physiologic criteria for pediatric sepsis.
Data were extracted by two reviewers on variables that fell within the World Health Organization's SDOH categories.
SDOH were not the primary outcome in any of the included studies. Seventeen percent of articles (18/106) did not report on any SDOH, and a further 36.8% (39/106) only reported on gender/sex. Of the remaining 46.2% of articles, the most reported SDOH categories were preadmission nutritional status (35.8%, 38/106) and race/ethnicity (18.9%, 20/106). However, no two studies used the same definition of the variables reported within each of these categories. Six studies reported on socioeconomic status (3.8%, 6/106), including two from upper-middle-income and four from lower middle-income countries. Only three studies reported on parental education levels (2.8%, 3/106). No study reported on parental job security or structural conflict.
We found overall low reporting of SDOH and marked variability in categorizations and definitions of SDOH variables. Consistent and standardized reporting of SDOH in pediatric sepsis studies is needed to understand the role these factors play in the development and severity of sepsis, to compare and extrapolate study results between settings and to implement policies aimed at improving socioeconomic conditions related to sepsis.
在脓毒症儿童研究中标准化、一致地报告社会决定因素(SDOH),可以:1)了解 SDOH 与疾病严重程度和结局的关系,2)比较人群并推断研究结果,3)确定政策制定者可改变的潜在社会经济因素。因此,我们试图确定在脓毒症儿童研究中,SDOH 数据报告的频率、收集的因素以及这些因素的定义。
我们回顾了最近一项关于儿科脓毒症生理标准的系统评价中使用的 106 篇文章(发表于 2005 年至 2020 年期间)。
两名评审员根据属于世界卫生组织 SDOH 类别的变量提取数据。
SDOH 不是纳入研究的主要结局。17%的文章(18/106)未报告任何 SDOH,另有 36.8%(39/106)仅报告性别/性别。在其余 46.2%的文章中,报告最多的 SDOH 类别是入院前营养状况(35.8%,38/106)和种族/民族(18.9%,20/106)。然而,没有两项研究使用相同的定义来报告这些类别中的变量。有 6 项研究报告了社会经济地位(3.8%,6/106),包括 2 项来自中上收入国家和 4 项来自中下收入国家。只有 3 项研究报告了父母的教育水平(2.8%,3/106)。没有研究报告父母的工作保障或结构性冲突。
我们发现 SDOH 的总体报告率较低,SDOH 变量的分类和定义差异很大。需要在儿科脓毒症研究中进行一致和标准化的 SDOH 报告,以了解这些因素在脓毒症发生和严重程度中的作用,比较和推断不同环境下的研究结果,并实施旨在改善与脓毒症相关的社会经济状况的政策。