• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

围手术期医学标准化终点(StEP)倡议的系统评价与共识定义:死亡率、发病率和器官衰竭。

Systematic reviews and consensus definitions for the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine (StEP) initiative: mortality, morbidity, and organ failure.

作者信息

Jackson Alexander I R, Boney Oliver, Pearse Rupert M, Kurz Andrea, Cooper D James, van Klei Wilton A, Cabrini Luca, Miller Timothy E, Moonesinghe S Ramani, Myles Paul S, Grocott Michael P W

机构信息

Perioperative and Critical Care Theme, NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK; Integrative Physiology and Critical Illness Group, Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Surgical Outcomes Research Centre, University College Hospital, London, UK; Health Services Research Centre, National Institute of Academic Anaesthesia, Royal College of Anaesthetists, London, UK.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2023 Apr;130(4):404-411. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.12.012. Epub 2023 Jan 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.bja.2022.12.012
PMID:36697275
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mortality, morbidity, and organ failure are important and common serious harms after surgery. However, there are many candidate measures to describe these outcome domains. Definitions of these measures are highly variable, and validity is often unclear. As part of the International Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine (StEP) initiative, this study aimed to derive a set of standardised and valid measures of mortality, morbidity, and organ failure for use in perioperative clinical trials.

METHODS

Three domains of endpoints (mortality, morbidity, and organ failure) were explored through systematic literature review and a three-stage Delphi consensus process using methods consistently applied across the StEP initiative. Reliability, feasibility, and patient-centredness were assessed in round 3 of the consensus process.

RESULTS

A high level of consensus was achieved for two mortality time points, 30-day and 1-yr mortality, and these two measures are recommended. No organ failure endpoints achieved threshold criteria for consensus recommendation. The Clavien-Dindo classification of complications achieved threshold criteria for consensus in round 2 of the Delphi process but did not achieve the threshold criteria in round 3 where it scored equivalently to the Post Operative Morbidity Survey. Clavien-Dindo therefore received conditional endorsement as the most widely used measure. No composite measures of organ failure achieved an acceptable level of consensus.

CONCLUSIONS

Both 30-day and 1-yr mortality measures are recommended. No measure is recommended for organ failure. One measure (Clavien-Dindo) is conditionally endorsed for postoperative morbidity, but our findings suggest that no single endpoint offers a reliable and valid measure to describe perioperative morbidity that is not dependent on the quality of deli-vered care. Further refinement of current measures, or development of novel measures, of postoperative morbidity might improve consensus in this area.

摘要

背景

死亡率、发病率和器官衰竭是手术后重要且常见的严重危害。然而,有许多候选指标可用于描述这些结局领域。这些指标的定义差异很大,其有效性往往也不明确。作为围手术期医学国际标准化终点(StEP)倡议的一部分,本研究旨在得出一套用于围手术期临床试验的标准化且有效的死亡率、发病率和器官衰竭指标。

方法

通过系统的文献综述以及采用StEP倡议中始终一致应用的方法进行的三阶段德尔菲共识过程,对三个终点领域(死亡率、发病率和器官衰竭)进行了探索。在共识过程的第三轮中评估了可靠性、可行性和以患者为中心的程度。

结果

对于两个死亡率时间点,即30天死亡率和1年死亡率,达成了高度共识,并推荐使用这两个指标。没有器官衰竭终点指标达到共识推荐的阈值标准。并发症的Clavien-Dindo分类在德尔菲过程的第二轮中达到了共识阈值标准,但在第三轮中未达到阈值标准,其得分与术后发病率调查相当。因此,Clavien-Dindo作为使用最广泛的指标获得了有条件的认可。没有器官衰竭的综合指标达到可接受的共识水平。

结论

推荐使用30天和1年死亡率指标。不推荐使用任何器官衰竭指标。一项指标(Clavien-Dindo)获得了术后发病率的有条件认可,但我们的研究结果表明,没有单一终点能够提供可靠且有效的指标来描述围手术期发病率,且该指标不依赖于所提供护理的质量。对当前术后发病率指标的进一步完善或开发新的指标,可能会提高该领域的共识。

相似文献

1
Systematic reviews and consensus definitions for the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine (StEP) initiative: mortality, morbidity, and organ failure.围手术期医学标准化终点(StEP)倡议的系统评价与共识定义:死亡率、发病率和器官衰竭。
Br J Anaesth. 2023 Apr;130(4):404-411. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.12.012. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
2
Systematic review and consensus definitions for the Standardized Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine (StEP) initiative: cardiovascular outcomes.系统评价和共识定义标准化围手术期医学(StEP)倡议的标准终点:心血管结局。
Br J Anaesth. 2021 Jan;126(1):56-66. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.09.023. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
3
Systematic review and consensus definitions for the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine (StEP) initiative: infection and sepsis.系统评价和共识定义在围手术期医学的标准化终点(StEP)倡议:感染和脓毒症。
Br J Anaesth. 2019 Apr;122(4):500-508. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.01.009. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
4
Systematic review and consensus definitions for the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine (StEP) initiative: renal endpoints.系统评价和共识定义标准化围手术期医学(StEP)倡议的标准终点:肾脏终点。
Br J Anaesth. 2018 Nov;121(5):1013-1024. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.08.010. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
5
Systematic review and consensus definitions for the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine initiative: clinical indicators.系统评价和共识定义围手术期医学标准终点倡议:临床指标。
Br J Anaesth. 2019 Aug;123(2):228-237. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.04.041. Epub 2019 May 23.
6
Systematic review and consensus definitions for the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine (StEP) initiative: patient comfort.系统评价和共识定义标准化围手术期医学(StEP)倡议的标准终点:患者舒适度。
Br J Anaesth. 2018 Apr;120(4):705-711. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.12.037. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
7
Systematic review and consensus definitions for the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine initiative: patient-centred outcomes.系统评价和围手术期医学倡议的标准化结局的共识定义:以患者为中心的结局。
Br J Anaesth. 2019 Nov;123(5):664-670. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.07.020. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
8
Clinical indicators for reporting the effectiveness of patient quality and safety-related interventions: a protocol of a systematic review and Delphi consensus process as part of the international Standardised Endpoints for Perioperative Medicine initiative (StEP).报告患者质量与安全相关干预措施有效性的临床指标:作为围手术期医学国际标准化终点(StEP)倡议一部分的系统评价和德尔菲共识过程方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 2;8(11):e023427. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023427.
9
Core Outcome Measures for Perioperative and Anaesthetic Care (COMPAC): a modified Delphi process to develop a core outcome set for trials in perioperative care and anaesthesia.围手术期和麻醉护理核心结局测量(COMPAC):一个改良的德尔菲法过程,用于开发围手术期护理和麻醉试验的核心结局集。
Br J Anaesth. 2022 Jan;128(1):174-185. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.09.027. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
10
Systematic review and consensus definitions for standardised endpoints in perioperative medicine: postoperative cancer outcomes.系统评价和围手术期医学标准化终点的共识定义:术后癌症结局。
Br J Anaesth. 2018 Jul;121(1):38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.03.020. Epub 2018 May 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of major postoperative complications on employment and earnings after elective hip or knee replacement surgery: a population-based matched cohort study.择期髋关节或膝关节置换术后主要并发症对就业和收入的影响:一项基于人群的匹配队列研究。
Can J Anaesth. 2025 May 12. doi: 10.1007/s12630-025-02960-0.
2
PBM and ERAS: mandatory bedfellows.药剂福利管理与加速康复外科:必然的伙伴。
Blood Transfus. 2025 Jan;23(1):9-11. doi: 10.2450/BloodTransfus.876. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
3
Impact of spinal or epidural anaesthesia on perioperative outcomes in adult noncardiac surgery: a narrative review of recent evidence.
椎管内麻醉对成人非心脏手术围手术期结局的影响:近期证据的叙述性综述。
Br J Anaesth. 2024 Aug;133(2):380-399. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.04.044. Epub 2024 May 28.
4
Exploring the need for reconsideration of trial design in perioperative outcomes research: a narrative review.探索围手术期结局研究中重新考虑试验设计的必要性:一项叙述性综述
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Feb 29;70:102510. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102510. eCollection 2024 Apr.
5
Effectiveness of dexmedetomidine during surgery under general anaesthesia on patient-centred outcomes: a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis protocol.全身麻醉手术中右美托咪定的有效性对以患者为中心的结局的影响:系统评价和贝叶斯荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 1;14(2):e080012. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080012.
6
Complications and consequences: short-term harm has long-term impact.并发症与后果:短期伤害具有长期影响。
BJA Open. 2023 Oct 19;8:100233. doi: 10.1016/j.bjao.2023.100233. eCollection 2023 Dec.