ROCKWOOL Foundation, Ny Kongensgade 6, 1472, Copenhagen C, Denmark.
Swedish Institute for Social Research, Stockholm University, 106-91, Stockholm, Sweden.
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jan 25;23(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15129-5.
Global estimates suggest strained mental health during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, but the lack of nationally representative and longitudinal data with clinically validated measures limits knowledge longer into the pandemic.
Data from 10 rounds of nationally representative surveys from Denmark tracked trends in risk of stress/depression from just before the first lockdown and through to April 2022. We focused on age groups and men and women in different living arrangements and controlled for seasonality in mental health that could otherwise be spuriously related to pandemic intensity.
Prior to first lockdown, we observed a "parent gap", which closed with the first lockdown. Instead, a gender gap materialized, with women experiencing higher risks than men-and higher than levels predating first lockdown. Older respondents (+ 70 years) experienced increasing risks of stress/depression early in the pandemic, while all other groups experienced decreases. But longer into the pandemic, risks increased for all age groups and reached (and sometimes exceeded) levels from before first lockdown.
Denmark had low infection rates throughout most of the pandemic, low mortality rates across the entire pandemic, and offered financial aid packages to curb financial strains. Despite this circumstance, initial improvements to mental health during the first lockdown in Denmark were short-lived. Two years of pandemic societal restrictions correspond with deteriorating mental health, as well as a change from a parenthood gap in mental health before first lockdown to a gender gap two years into the pandemic.
全球估计表明,在 COVID-19 大流行的第一年期间,心理健康状况紧张,但由于缺乏具有临床验证措施的全国代表性和纵向数据,对大流行更长时间内的知识了解有限。
来自丹麦的 10 轮全国代表性调查的数据跟踪了从第一次封锁前到 2022 年 4 月期间压力/抑郁风险的趋势。我们关注了不同生活安排的年龄组和男女,并控制了心理健康的季节性,否则季节性可能与大流行强度产生虚假关联。
在第一次封锁之前,我们观察到了一个“父母差距”,这个差距在第一次封锁时缩小了。相反,出现了性别差距,女性的风险高于男性,也高于第一次封锁前的水平。年长的受访者(+70 岁)在大流行早期经历了越来越大的压力/抑郁风险,而其他所有群体的风险都在下降。但在大流行的后期,所有年龄组的风险都增加了,达到(有时甚至超过)第一次封锁前的水平。
丹麦在大流行的大部分时间里感染率都很低,整个大流行期间死亡率都很低,并且提供了财政援助计划来遏制财政紧张。尽管如此,丹麦在第一次封锁期间心理健康的最初改善是短暂的。两年的大流行社会限制与心理健康恶化以及从第一次封锁前的父母心理健康差距转变为两年大流行期间的性别差距相对应。