文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

非侵入性脑刺激干预对痴呆患者认知的有益影响:随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。

The beneficial effect on cognition of noninvasive brain stimulation intervention in patients with dementia: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Prospect Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology & Neurology, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan.

Institute of Biomedical Sciences, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

出版信息

Alzheimers Res Ther. 2023 Jan 25;15(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13195-023-01164-2.


DOI:10.1186/s13195-023-01164-2
PMID:36698219
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9875424/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dementia [i.e., Alzheimer disease (AD)], the most common neurodegenerative disease, causes profound negative impacts on executive function and quality of life. Available pharmacological treatments often fail to achieve satisfactory outcomes. Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques, which focally modify cortical function and enhance synaptic long-term potentiation, are potentially beneficial for the cognition in patients with AD. The aim of the current network meta-analysis (NMA) was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different NIBS interventions in patients with AD through NMA. METHODS: Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining NIBS interventions in patients with AD had been included. All NMA procedures were performed under the frequentist model. The primary and secondary outcomes were changes in cognitive function and quality of life, respectively. RESULTS: Nineteen RCTs (639 participants) were included. The mean treatment and follow-up durations were 5.7 and 10.5 weeks, respectively. The combination of cathodal tDCS of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and anodal tDCS over the right supraorbital region (c-tDCS-F3 + a-tDCS-Fp2) was associated with a significant beneficial effect on cognition compared with sham controls (standardized mean difference=2.43, 95% confidence interval=0.61-4.26, n=12 and 11). It was also associated with the greatest beneficial effect on cognition among all the investigated NIBS approaches. All the methods were well tolerated with regard to the safety profile, as reflected in the rates of adverse events or local discomfort, as well as acceptability, as indicated by dropout rate. CONCLUSIONS: The present findings provide evidence of the benefits of NIBS, especially tDCS, for beneficial effect on cognition in patients with AD. However, because of few studies included, this effect was not replicated yet in the other studies. Therefore, future larger-scale and longer follow-up duration RCTs should be warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020209516. The current study had been approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center (TSGHIRB No. B-109-29).

摘要

背景:痴呆症(即阿尔茨海默病,AD)是最常见的神经退行性疾病,对执行功能和生活质量造成严重负面影响。现有的药物治疗往往无法取得满意的效果。非侵入性脑刺激(NIBS)技术可以有针对性地改变皮质功能并增强突触长时程增强,对于 AD 患者的认知功能具有潜在益处。本网络荟萃分析(NMA)旨在通过 NMA 评估不同 NIBS 干预措施对 AD 患者的疗效和安全性。

方法:仅纳入了评估 AD 患者 NIBS 干预措施的随机对照试验(RCT)。所有 NMA 程序均在经典频率派模型下进行。主要和次要结局分别为认知功能和生活质量的变化。

结果:共纳入 19 项 RCT(639 名参与者)。平均治疗和随访时间分别为 5.7 周和 10.5 周。左背外侧前额叶的阴极 tDCS 与右眶上区的阳极 tDCS(c-tDCS-F3 + a-tDCS-Fp2)联合治疗与假对照相比,对认知功能具有显著的有益影响(标准化均数差=2.43,95%置信区间=0.61-4.26,n=12 和 11)。在所有研究的 NIBS 方法中,该方法对认知功能的有益效果最大。所有方法在安全性方面均具有良好的耐受性,这反映在不良事件或局部不适的发生率以及可接受性(表明退出率)上。

结论:本研究结果提供了 NIBS(特别是 tDCS)对 AD 患者认知功能有益影响的证据。然而,由于纳入的研究较少,这一效果尚未在其他研究中得到复制。因此,未来需要进行更大规模和更长随访时间的 RCT 来验证这一效果。

试验注册:PROSPERO CRD42020209516。本研究已获得三军总医院国防医学中心机构审查委员会(TSGHIRB No. B-109-29)的批准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df7e/9875424/41f8d0d8b290/13195_2023_1164_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df7e/9875424/47857eeb97aa/13195_2023_1164_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df7e/9875424/2a5849ff9dc9/13195_2023_1164_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df7e/9875424/41f8d0d8b290/13195_2023_1164_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df7e/9875424/47857eeb97aa/13195_2023_1164_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df7e/9875424/2a5849ff9dc9/13195_2023_1164_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df7e/9875424/41f8d0d8b290/13195_2023_1164_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

[1]
The beneficial effect on cognition of noninvasive brain stimulation intervention in patients with dementia: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Alzheimers Res Ther. 2023-1-25

[2]
Association of Central Noninvasive Brain Stimulation Interventions With Efficacy and Safety in Tinnitus Management: A Meta-analysis.

JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020-9-1

[3]
Non-pharmacological interventions for improving language and communication in people with primary progressive aphasia.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024-5-29

[4]
Comparative efficacy of different noninvasive brain stimulation therapies for recovery of global cognitive function, attention, memory, and executive function after stroke: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2023-6-10

[5]
Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation interventions on cognitive impairment: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials.

J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025-2-5

[6]
Efficacy and acceptability of noninvasive brain stimulation for treating posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2024-7

[7]
Assessment of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation Interventions for Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

JAMA Psychiatry. 2022-8-1

[8]
Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation on global cognition and neuropsychiatric symptoms in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Ageing Res Rev. 2021-12

[9]
The cognitive effect of non-invasive brain stimulation combined with cognitive training in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Alzheimers Res Ther. 2024-6-27

[10]
Comparative efficacy of different noninvasive brain stimulation protocols on upper-extremity motor function and activities of daily living after stroke: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Neurol Sci. 2024-8

引用本文的文献

[1]
The comparative evidence of efficacy of non-invasive brain and nerve stimulation in diabetic neuropathy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025-4-19

[2]
Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation interventions on cognitive impairment: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials.

J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025-2-5

[3]
Effective engagement in computerized cognitive training for older adults.

Ageing Res Rev. 2025-2

[4]
Does Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Affect Potential P300-Related Events in Vascular Dementia? Considerations from a Pilot Study.

Biomedicines. 2024-6-11

[5]
Assessment of noninvasive brain stimulation interventions in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Sci Rep. 2024-6-20

[6]
Comparative Effectiveness of Different Exercises for Reducing Pain Intensity in Primary Dysmenorrhea: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Sports Med Open. 2024-5-30

[7]
Impact of twice-a-day transcranial direct current stimulation intervention on cognitive function and motor cortex plasticity in patients with Alzheimer's disease.

Gen Psychiatr. 2023-11-17

[8]
The Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Neurol Int. 2023-11-29

本文引用的文献

[1]
Effectiveness and acceptability of noninvasive brain and nerve stimulation techniques for migraine prophylaxis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

J Headache Pain. 2022-2-20

[2]
Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation interventions in reducing smoking frequency in patients with nicotine dependence: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Addiction. 2022-7

[3]
Efficacy and acceptability of noninvasive brain stimulation interventions for weight reduction in obesity: a pilot network meta-analysis.

Int J Obes (Lond). 2021-8

[4]
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.

BMJ. 2021-3-29

[5]
Cognitive effects and acceptability of non-invasive brain stimulation on Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment: a component network meta-analysis.

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2021-2

[6]
Neuromodulation for Apathy in Alzheimer's Disease: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Sham-Controlled Pilot Study.

J Alzheimers Dis. 2020

[7]
Corticomotor Plasticity Predicts Clinical Efficacy of Combined Neuromodulation and Cognitive Training in Alzheimer's Disease.

Front Aging Neurosci. 2020-7-8

[8]
Association of Central Noninvasive Brain Stimulation Interventions With Efficacy and Safety in Tinnitus Management: A Meta-analysis.

JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020-9-1

[9]
Non-invasive Brain Stimulation in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment-A State-of-the-Art Review on Methodological Characteristics and Stimulation Parameters.

Front Hum Neurosci. 2020-5-25

[10]
Effects of short- and long-term neurostimulation (tDCS) on Alzheimer's disease patients: two randomized studies.

Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021-2

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索