Suppr超能文献

[热前庭评估中的球囊法与水灌注法。两种方法的眼震电图比较]

[Balloon method and water irrigation in thermal vestibular assessment. Electronystagmographic comparison of both methods].

作者信息

Westhofen M

机构信息

HNO-Klinik des Universitätskrankenhauses-Eppendorf.

出版信息

Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg). 1987 Aug;66(8):424-7.

PMID:3669832
Abstract

In cases of large central perforation of the eardrum, caloric test of the vestibular organ cannot be carried out by irrigation of the external auditory canal with water but must be done with a balloon instilled in the external auditory canal perfused with water. Caloric responses were registered by using water irrigation and balloon irrigation in 40 healthy persons. Nystagmographic registrations were analysed. Frequency, slow phase velocity and amplitude of nystagmus were measured. Cumulative percentage curves of the four caloric responses are drawn to compare the distribution of data in balloon and water irrigation (Figures 2-5). In addition, mean values and standard deviations of data and of difference in excitability related to the total excitability are recorded in table 1. Statistics (Wilcoxon test for matched pairs) reveals no significant differences in nystagmographic pattern of caloric reactions between water and balloon stimulation. It is concluded that in the caloric test of the vestibular organ balloon irrigation is equivalent to water irrigation. Balloon irrigation is more comfortable for the patient and easier to handle.

摘要

在鼓膜中央大穿孔的病例中,不能通过向外耳道注水来进行前庭器官的冷热试验,而必须通过向置于外耳道的球囊内灌注水来进行。对40名健康人分别采用注水法和球囊灌注法进行冷热试验,并记录冷热反应。分析眼震电图记录,测量眼震的频率、慢相速度和幅度。绘制四种冷热反应的累积百分比曲线,以比较球囊灌注法和注水法的数据分布(图2-5)。此外,表1记录了数据的平均值、标准差以及与总兴奋性相关的兴奋性差异。统计学分析(配对威尔科克森检验)显示,注水刺激和球囊刺激引起的冷热反应的眼震电图模式无显著差异。得出结论:在前庭器官的冷热试验中,球囊灌注法等同于注水法。球囊灌注法让患者感觉更舒适,操作也更简便。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验