文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

指压疗法与帕瑞昔布钠治疗急性肾绞痛的前瞻性队列研究

Acupressure versus parecoxib sodium in acute renal colic: A prospective cohort study.

作者信息

Chen Chiwei, Zhang Zhenpeng, Lin Mandi, Wang Zhigang, Liu Hao, Meng Hao, Wang Jun, Chen Ming, Xiang Songtao, Qiu Yunqiao, Liu Hong

机构信息

The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jan 9;9:968433. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.968433. eCollection 2022.


DOI:10.3389/fmed.2022.968433
PMID:36698807
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9868725/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Here provides a complementary treatment, acupressure at the Qiu acupoint, a novel acupoint, which potentially alleviates renal colic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 90 patients were included in this study. Acupressure-group patients ( = 46) were administered acupressure at the Qiu acupoint following a preset protocol. Parecoxib sodium-group patients ( = 44) were administered parecoxib sodium (40 mg) ( the direct intravenous route). The visual analog scale (VAS) was used to evaluate pain intensity at baseline and at 1, 5, 10, 20, 30, and 120 min after initiating the intervention. Linear mixed effects model was performed to detect the rate of decrease of VAS per time and their covariant effect on the efficacy of acupressure. RESULTS: No significant statistical differences in baseline data and VAS scores were observed. The acupressure group obtained lower VAS scores at the 1st, 5th, 10th, and 20th minute than the parecoxib sodium group after initiating the intervention (mean: 4.33 vs. 7.61, mean difference (MD): 3.29, 95% CI: 0.23, 2.84; mean: 2.65 vs. 7.61, MD: 4.96, 95% CI: 4.44, 5.49; mean: 1.63 vs. 6.59, MD: 4.96, 95% CI: 4.48, 5.44; mean: 1.26 vs. 3.64 MD: 2.38, 95% CI: 1.87, 2.88; < 0.05). The markedly effective rate was similar between the two groups. The linear mixed effects model demonstrated that acupressure at the Qiu point was significantly faster than parecoxib sodium in decreasing VAS scores with an estimate of -2.05 (95% CI: -2.51, -1.59, = 0.000), especially within 10 minutes with an estimate of 0.18 (95% CI: 0.12, 0.25, = 0.000). CONCLUSION: Acupressure at the Qiu acupoint is significantly faster than parecoxib sodium in decreasing VAS scores within 10 minutes. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.chictr.org.cn/, identifier 2100047168.

摘要

背景:本文提供了一种辅助治疗方法,即对一个新穴位——丘墟穴进行指压,该方法可能缓解肾绞痛。 材料与方法:本研究纳入90例患者。指压组患者(n = 46)按照预设方案对丘墟穴进行指压。帕瑞昔布钠组患者(n = 44)静脉注射帕瑞昔布钠(40 mg)。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)在基线以及干预开始后1、5、10、20、30和120分钟评估疼痛强度。采用线性混合效应模型检测VAS评分随时间的下降速率及其对指压疗效的协变量效应。 结果:两组患者的基线数据和VAS评分无显著统计学差异。干预开始后,指压组在第1、5、10和20分钟时的VAS评分低于帕瑞昔布钠组(均值:4.33对7.61,平均差值(MD):3.29,95%可信区间(CI):0.23,2.84;均值:2.65对7.61,MD:4.96,95% CI:4.44,5.49;均值:1.63对6.59,MD:4.96,95% CI:4.48,5.44;均值:1.26对3.64,MD:2.38,95% CI:1.87,2.88;P < 0.05)。两组的显效率相似。线性混合效应模型表明,丘墟穴指压在降低VAS评分方面明显快于帕瑞昔布钠,估计值为 -2.05(95% CI:-2.51,-1.59,P = 0.000),尤其是在10分钟内,估计值为0.18(95% CI:0.12,0.25,P = 0.000)。 结论:丘墟穴指压在10分钟内降低VAS评分的速度明显快于帕瑞昔布钠。 临床试验注册:http://www.chictr.org.cn/,标识符2100047168。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8fd/9868725/8f3d9d0f7649/fmed-09-968433-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8fd/9868725/51ed52658676/fmed-09-968433-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8fd/9868725/45baf6e39fdb/fmed-09-968433-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8fd/9868725/8f3d9d0f7649/fmed-09-968433-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8fd/9868725/51ed52658676/fmed-09-968433-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8fd/9868725/45baf6e39fdb/fmed-09-968433-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8fd/9868725/8f3d9d0f7649/fmed-09-968433-g003.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Acupressure versus parecoxib sodium in acute renal colic: A prospective cohort study.

Front Med (Lausanne). 2023-1-9

[2]
Efficacy and safety of parecoxib in the treatment of acute renal colic: a randomized clinical trial.

Int Braz J Urol. 2011

[3]
Effect of acupressure on pain intensity and physiological indices in patients undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a randomized double-blind sham-controlled clinical trial.

BMC Complement Med Ther. 2024-1-25

[4]
Efficacy and safety of parecoxib/phloroglucinol combination therapy versus parecoxib monotherapy for acute renal colic: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial.

Cell Biochem Biophys. 2014-5

[5]
Postoperative analgesic effect of parecoxib sodium local anesthesia in patients with breast cancer through systematic review and meta-analysis.

Gland Surg. 2021-11

[6]
Comparison of the effects of parecoxib and diclofenac in preemptive analgesia: A prospective, randomized, assessor-blind, single-dose, parallel-group study in patients undergoing elective general surgery.

Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2004-9

[7]
Efficacy and Safety of Acupuncture in Renal Colic Caused by Urinary Calculi in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022-7-4

[8]
Acupuncture for dysmenorrhoea.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-4-18

[9]
The Effect of Body Acupressure on Blood Pressure and Fatigue Levels in Individuals Suffering From Hypotension During Hemodialysis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Altern Ther Health Med. 2022-2

[10]
Traditional Chinese medicine auricular point acupressure for the relief of pain, fatigue, and gastrointestinal adverse reactions after the injection of novel coronavirus-19 vaccines: a structured summary of a study protocol for a multicentre, three-arm, single-blind, prospective randomized controlled trial.

Trials. 2021-2-25

引用本文的文献

[1]
Effect of acupressure on pain intensity and physiological indices in patients undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a randomized double-blind sham-controlled clinical trial.

BMC Complement Med Ther. 2024-1-25

本文引用的文献

[1]
Erector spinae plane block vs non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for severe renal colic pain: A pilot clinical feasibility study.

Int J Clin Pract. 2021-3

[2]
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and organ damage: A current perspective.

Biochem Pharmacol. 2020-7-10

[3]
Research Advances on Acupuncture Analgesia.

Am J Chin Med. 2020-3-5

[4]
Prognostic implications of human papillomavirus type 16 status in non-oropharyngeal head and neck cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.

Ann Transl Med. 2019-12

[5]
Propensity Score Matching: A Statistical Method.

Clin Spine Surg. 2020-4

[6]
Clinical Evidence for Association of Acupuncture and Acupressure With Improved Cancer Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

JAMA Oncol. 2020-2-1

[7]
Intracutaneous sterile water injection for pain relief during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: comparison with diclofenac sodium.

Urolithiasis. 2020-4

[8]
Central and Peripheral Mechanism of Acupuncture Analgesia on Visceral Pain: A Systematic Review.

Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2019-5-2

[9]
The management of acute renal colic.

Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2019-1-2

[10]
Acupuncture and acupressure for premenstrual syndrome.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-8-14

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索