Satler Jordan D, Herre Edward Allen, Heath Tracy A, Machado Carlos A, Gómez Zúñiga Adalberto, Jandér K Charlotte, Eaton Deren A R, Nason John D
Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology Iowa State University Ames Iowa USA.
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute Miami Florida USA.
Ecol Evol. 2023 Jan 18;13(1):e9673. doi: 10.1002/ece3.9673. eCollection 2023 Jan.
Obligate pollination mutualisms, in which plant and pollinator lineages depend on each other for reproduction, often exhibit high levels of species specificity. However, cases in which two or more pollinator species share a single host species (host sharing), or two or more host species share a single pollinator species (pollinator sharing), are known to occur in current ecological time. Further, evidence for host switching in evolutionary time is increasingly being recognized in these systems. The degree to which departures from strict specificity differentially affect the potential for hybridization and introgression in the associated host or pollinator is unclear. We addressed this question using genome-wide sequence data from five sympatric Panamanian free-standing fig species ( subgenus , section ) and their six associated fig-pollinator wasp species (). Two of the five fig species, and , were found to regularly share pollinators. In these species, ongoing hybridization was demonstrated by the detection of several first-generation (F1) hybrid individuals, and historical introgression was indicated by phylogenetic network analysis. By contrast, although two of the pollinator species regularly share hosts, all six species were genetically distinct and deeply divergent, with no evidence for either hybridization or introgression. This pattern is consistent with results from other obligate pollination mutualisms, suggesting that, in contrast to their host plants, pollinators appear to be reproductively isolated, even when different species of pollinators mate in shared hosts.
专性传粉互利共生关系中,植物和传粉者谱系在繁殖上相互依赖,通常表现出高度的物种特异性。然而,已知在当前生态时间内会出现两种或更多传粉者物种共享单一宿主物种(宿主共享),或两种或更多宿主物种共享单一传粉者物种(传粉者共享)的情况。此外,在这些系统中,进化时间内宿主转换的证据也越来越受到认可。偏离严格特异性在多大程度上对相关宿主或传粉者的杂交和基因渗入潜力产生不同影响尚不清楚。我们使用来自巴拿马五种同域分布的独立无花果物种(亚属,组)及其六种相关无花果传粉黄蜂物种()的全基因组序列数据来解决这个问题。在这五种无花果物种中,有两种,即 和 ,被发现经常共享传粉者。在这些物种中,通过检测到几个第一代(F1)杂交个体证明了正在进行的杂交,系统发育网络分析表明存在历史基因渗入。相比之下,虽然有两种传粉者物种经常共享宿主,但所有六个物种在基因上都是不同的,且分歧很大,没有杂交或基因渗入的证据。这种模式与其他专性传粉互利共生关系的结果一致,表明与它们的宿主植物不同,传粉者即使在不同物种的传粉者在共享宿主中交配时,似乎也存在生殖隔离。