Osen Daniel E, Abie Sisay Mebre, Martinsen Ørjan G, Egelandsdal Bjørg, Münch Daniel
Department of Physics, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway.
Faculty of Ecology and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 1432 Ås, Oslo, Norway.
J Electr Bioimpedance. 2023 Jan 14;13(1):125-131. doi: 10.2478/joeb-2022-0017. eCollection 2022 Jan.
Correct food labeling is a legal requirement and helps consumers to make informed purchasing choices. Mislabeling defrosted meat as fresh is illegal in the EU. However, there are no standardized technologies to authenticate fresh versus defrosted meat. We address this by testing if bioimpedance-based measurements can separate defrosted meat from refrigerated-only meat at the end of shelf life, i.e., when also fresh meat shows deterioration. Pork sirloin samples from 20 pigs were first tested at 12 days postmortem ('fresh group'). This time point was chosen to represent a typical use-by date for refrigerated storage of fresh pork. Then, all samples were transferred to a -24°C freezer for 3 days and thawed for 2 days before final testing ('frozen-thawed group'). Bioimpedance analyses (BIA) were done in a frequency range of [10-10 Hz]. Weight, pH and electrode positioning were assessed to test for potential confounding effects. Statistics for treatment dependent differences were based on the established P parameter and phase angle, which were extracted from the BI spectra. We found that using bioimpedance testing with tetrapolar electrodes, P and phase angle allowed almost complete separation of fresh and previously frozen samples. However, within the whole sample population, there was some overlap between the spectra of fresh and frozen samples. Yet, based on P, only one fresh sample (5% of N=20) fell in the lowest P class with all the frozen samples. We used a multifactorial design that allowed to test the effects of potential confounding factors, such as electrode positioning and meat quality parameters. We found a relatively low explained variance for the P parameter, indicating that confounding effects from other factors or quality defects in fresh pork may affect the detection capacity of bioimpedance-based authentication of fresh pork. Our data, therefore, suggest that reliable fresh-label authentication with bioimpedance testing should be based on testing a small number of samples to represent a specific lot of pork that is to be inspected.
正确的食品标签是一项法律要求,有助于消费者做出明智的购买选择。在欧盟,将解冻肉误标为新鲜肉是违法的。然而,目前尚无标准化技术来鉴别新鲜肉与解冻肉。我们通过测试基于生物电阻抗的测量方法能否在保质期结束时,即鲜肉也出现变质时,将解冻肉与仅冷藏的肉区分开来,来解决这一问题。从20头猪身上采集猪里脊肉样本,首先在宰后12天进行测试(“新鲜组”)。选择这个时间点来代表新鲜猪肉冷藏储存的典型保质期。然后,将所有样本转移到-24°C的冷冻室中3天,解冻2天后进行最终测试(“冻融组”)。生物电阻抗分析(BIA)在[10 - 10 Hz]的频率范围内进行。评估重量、pH值和电极位置,以测试潜在的混杂效应。基于处理相关差异的统计数据基于从BI光谱中提取的既定P参数和相角。我们发现,使用四极电极进行生物电阻抗测试时,P参数和相角几乎可以完全区分新鲜样本和先前冷冻的样本。然而,在整个样本群体中,新鲜样本和冷冻样本的光谱存在一些重叠。不过,基于P参数,只有一个新鲜样本(N = 20中的5%)与所有冷冻样本落在最低P类别中。我们采用多因素设计,以测试潜在混杂因素的影响,如电极位置和肉质参数。我们发现P参数的解释方差相对较低,这表明新鲜猪肉中其他因素或质量缺陷的混杂效应可能会影响基于生物电阻抗的新鲜猪肉鉴别能力。因此,我们的数据表明,使用生物电阻抗测试进行可靠的新鲜标签认证应基于测试少量样本,以代表要检查的特定批次猪肉。