Parepalli Divya, Srinivas Bheemanathi Hanuman, Basu Debdatta, Ps Priyamvada, Dubashi Biswajith
Pathology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, IND.
Nephrology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, IND.
Cureus. 2022 Dec 25;14(12):e32929. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32929. eCollection 2022 Dec.
Background Renal involvement in monoclonal gammopathies presents with different clinico-morphological patterns and can manifest at the onset or the late phase of hematological disease, or after chemotherapy. The spectrum is ever-expanding with advancements in diagnostic methods. Renal biopsy is needed for accurate diagnosis, as each of these patterns carries therapeutic and prognostic implications. Methods A total of 41 cases of monoclonal gammopathies were included in the study. Clinical, biochemical, and hematological details were obtained, and pathological variables were observed. Patients were followed till the maximum possible period, and treatment history and follow-up creatinine details were collected. Results The spectrum of renal biopsy lesions observed included light chain cast nephropathy (LCCN) n=19, amyloidosis n=11, monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease (MIDD) n=6, and proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition (PGNMID) n=5; 10 of these cases can be categorized as monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS). Acute kidney injury (AKI) (41%) is the predominant clinical presentation in general whereas the majority of amyloidosis cases presented with nephrotic and sub-nephrotic proteinuria. LCCN cases had high serum creatinine and calcium, positivity for M-spike, as well as a high FLC ratio, compared to the other types. Around 100% of LCCN and MIDD patients had myeloma and 100% of PGNMID cases had normal marrow. Conclusion More than three-fourths of patients were diagnosed with monoclonal gammopathies with biochemical and hematological workups after an initial kidney biopsy. The clinicopathological profile of these patients had a broad spectrum but there were still some consistent findings within the different types. A subgroup of patients (MGRS) had undetectable serum paraproteins but had monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition in the kidney.
肾脏受累于单克隆丙种球蛋白病呈现出不同的临床形态学模式,可在血液系统疾病的发病初期、晚期或化疗后出现。随着诊断方法的进步,其范围不断扩大。由于每种模式都具有治疗和预后意义,因此需要进行肾活检以准确诊断。方法:本研究共纳入41例单克隆丙种球蛋白病患者。获取临床、生化和血液学详细信息,并观察病理变量。对患者进行尽可能长时间的随访,收集治疗史和随访肌酐详细信息。结果:观察到的肾活检病变谱包括轻链管型肾病(LCCN)n = 19、淀粉样变性n = 11、单克隆免疫球蛋白沉积病(MIDD)n = 6和伴单克隆免疫球蛋白沉积的增生性肾小球肾炎(PGNMID)n = 5;其中10例可归类为具有肾脏意义的单克隆丙种球蛋白病(MGRS)。一般而言,急性肾损伤(AKI)(41%)是主要的临床表现,而大多数淀粉样变性病例表现为肾病性和亚肾病性蛋白尿。与其他类型相比,LCCN病例的血清肌酐和钙水平较高,M峰阳性,游离轻链比值也较高。约100%的LCCN和MIDD患者患有骨髓瘤,100%的PGNMID病例骨髓正常。结论:超过四分之三的患者在初次肾活检后通过生化和血液学检查被诊断为单克隆丙种球蛋白病。这些患者的临床病理特征范围广泛,但不同类型之间仍有一些一致的发现。一部分患者(MGRS)血清副蛋白检测不到,但肾脏中有单克隆免疫球蛋白沉积。