Davidovic Jovana
Department of Philosophy, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States.
Stockdale Center for Ethical Leadership, United States Naval Academy, Annapolis, MD, United States.
Front Big Data. 2023 Jan 9;5:1017677. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2022.1017677. eCollection 2022.
Meaningful human control over AI is exalted as a key tool for assuring safety, dignity, and responsibility for AI and automated decision-systems. It is a central topic especially in fields that deal with the use of AI for decisions that could cause significant harm, like AI-enabled weapons systems. This paper argues that discussions regarding meaningful human control commonly fail to identify the purpose behind the call for meaningful human control and that stating that purpose is a necessary step in deciding how best to institutionalize meaningful human control over AI. The paper identifies 5 common purposes for human control and sketches how different purpose translate into different institutional design.
人类对人工智能进行有意义的控制，被推崇为确保人工智能及自动化决策系统的安全性、尊严和责任的关键工具。这是一个核心议题，尤其在那些涉及使用人工智能做出可能造成重大危害的决策的领域，比如人工智能武器系统。本文认为，关于有意义的人类控制的讨论通常未能明确呼吁有意义的人类控制背后的目的，而阐明该目的是决定如何以最佳方式将对人工智能的有意义的人类控制制度化的必要步骤。本文确定了人类控制的5个常见目的，并概述了不同目的如何转化为不同的制度设计。
