• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

艾司西酞普兰、度洛西汀和伏硫西汀在急性焦虑抑郁治疗中的疗效与安全性:一项随机、评估者盲法的6周临床试验。

Efficacy and Safety of Escitalopram, Desvenlafaxine, and Vortioxetine in the Acute Treatment of Anxious Depression: A Randomized Rater-blinded 6-week Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Shin Cheolmin, Jeon Sang Won, Lee Seung-Hoon, Pae Chi-Un, Hong Narei, Lim Hyun Kook, Patkar Ashwin A, Masand Prakash S, An Hyonggin, Han Changsu

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Psychiatry, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2023 Feb 28;21(1):135-146. doi: 10.9758/cpn.2023.21.1.135.

DOI:10.9758/cpn.2023.21.1.135
PMID:36700320
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9889909/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Anxious depression is associated with greater chronicity, higher severity of symptoms, more severe functional impairment, and poor response to drug treatment. However, evidence for first-choice antidepressants in patients with anxious depression is limited. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of escitalopram, desvenlafaxine, and vortioxetine in the acute treatment of anxious depression.

METHODS

Patients (n = 124) with major depressive disorder and high levels of anxiety were randomly assigned to an escitalopram treatment group (n = 42), desvenlafaxine treatment group (n = 40), or vortioxetine treatment group (n = 42) in a 6-week randomized rater-blinded head-to-head comparative trial. Changes in overall depressive and anxiety symptoms were assessed using the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA), respectively.

RESULTS

Patients demonstrated similar baseline-to-endpoint improvement in scores and similar response and remission rates for HAMD and HAMA. Analysis of the individual HAMD items revealed that desvenlafaxine significantly reduced anxiety somatic scores ( = 0.013) and hypochondriasis scores ( = 0.014) compared to escitalopram. With respect to the individual HAMA items, desvenlafaxine treatment showed significantly lower scores for respiratory symptoms ( = 0.013) than escitalopram treatment and cardiovascular symptoms ( = 0.005) than vortioxetine treatment. The treatments were well tolerated, with no significant differences.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicated no significant differences in the efficacy and tolerability of escitalopram, desvenlafaxine, and vortioxetine in this subtype of patients with anxious depression during the acute phase of treatment.

摘要

目的

焦虑抑郁与更高的慢性化程度、更严重的症状、更严重的功能损害以及对药物治疗的不良反应相关。然而,关于焦虑抑郁患者首选抗抑郁药的证据有限。本研究旨在比较艾司西酞普兰、度洛西汀和伏硫西汀在急性治疗焦虑抑郁中的疗效和安全性。

方法

在一项为期6周的随机、评估者盲法、头对头比较试验中,将124例伴有高度焦虑的重度抑郁症患者随机分配至艾司西酞普兰治疗组(n = 42)、度洛西汀治疗组(n = 40)或伏硫西汀治疗组(n = 42)。分别使用17项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)和汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)评估总体抑郁和焦虑症状的变化。

结果

患者在HAMD和HAMA评分上从基线到终点的改善相似,反应率和缓解率也相似。对HAMD各单项的分析显示,与艾司西酞普兰相比,度洛西汀显著降低了焦虑躯体症状评分(P = 0.013)和疑病症状评分(P = 0.014)。就HAMA各单项而言,度洛西汀治疗的呼吸症状评分(P = 0.013)显著低于艾司西酞普兰治疗,心血管症状评分(P = 0.005)低于伏硫西汀治疗。这些治疗耐受性良好,无显著差异。

结论

我们的结果表明,在治疗急性期,艾司西酞普兰、度洛西汀和伏硫西汀在这类焦虑抑郁亚型患者中的疗效和耐受性无显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19f3/9889909/8cf42fb03df0/cpn-21-1-135-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19f3/9889909/8cf42fb03df0/cpn-21-1-135-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19f3/9889909/8cf42fb03df0/cpn-21-1-135-f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of Escitalopram, Desvenlafaxine, and Vortioxetine in the Acute Treatment of Anxious Depression: A Randomized Rater-blinded 6-week Clinical Trial.艾司西酞普兰、度洛西汀和伏硫西汀在急性焦虑抑郁治疗中的疗效与安全性:一项随机、评估者盲法的6周临床试验。
Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2023 Feb 28;21(1):135-146. doi: 10.9758/cpn.2023.21.1.135.
2
Acute Efficacy and Safety of Escitalopram Versus Desvenlafaxine and Vortioxetine in the Treatment of Depression With Cognitive Complaint: A Rater-Blinded Randomized Comparative Study.艾司西酞普兰与去甲文拉法辛和伏硫西汀治疗伴认知主诉抑郁症的急性疗效与安全性:一项评分者盲法随机对照研究
Psychiatry Investig. 2022 Apr;19(4):268-280. doi: 10.30773/pi.2021.0368. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
3
Open-label treatment with desvenlafaxine in postmenopausal women with major depressive disorder not responding to acute treatment with desvenlafaxine or escitalopram.在对急性治疗未能应答的绝经后女性抑郁症患者中进行的安非他酮开放性治疗。
CNS Drugs. 2011 Mar;25(3):227-38. doi: 10.2165/11586460-000000000-00000.
4
Efficacy and safety of escitalopram versus desvenlafaxine in the treatment of major depression: A preliminary 1-year prospective randomized open label comparative trial.艾司西酞普兰与去甲文拉法辛治疗重度抑郁症的疗效与安全性:一项为期1年的初步前瞻性随机开放标签对照试验。
Perspect Clin Res. 2016 Jan-Mar;7(1):45-50. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.173771.
5
Clinical effectiveness and safety of escitalopram and desvenlafaxine in patients of depression with anxiety: a randomized, open-label controlled trial.艾司西酞普兰与去甲文拉法辛治疗伴焦虑的抑郁症患者的临床有效性与安全性:一项随机、开放标签对照试验
Indian J Pharmacol. 2014 Jul-Aug;46(4):433-7. doi: 10.4103/0253-7613.135959.
6
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Escitalopram versus Desvenlafaxine in Postmenopausal Women with Depression and Anxiety: A Randomized, Open-Label, Comparative Trial.艾司西酞普兰与去甲文拉法辛治疗绝经后抑郁和焦虑女性的疗效及安全性比较:一项随机、开放标签的对照试验
J Midlife Health. 2019 Jul-Sep;10(3):141-146. doi: 10.4103/jmh.JMH_139_18.
7
The effect of desvenlafaxine 50 mg/day on a subpopulation of anxious/depressed patients: a pooled analysis of seven randomized, placebo-controlled studies.每日50毫克去甲文拉法辛对焦虑/抑郁患者亚群的影响:七项随机、安慰剂对照研究的汇总分析
Hum Psychopharmacol. 2014 Sep;29(5):492-501. doi: 10.1002/hup.2427. Epub 2014 Aug 11.
8
The relationship between plasma serotonin and kynurenine pathway metabolite levels and the treatment response to escitalopram and desvenlafaxine.血浆 5-羟色胺和犬尿氨酸通路代谢产物水平与依他普仑和去甲文拉法辛治疗反应的关系。
Brain Behav Immun. 2020 Jul;87:404-412. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.01.011. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
9
Desvenlafaxine and escitalopram for the treatment of postmenopausal women with major depressive disorder.去甲文拉法辛与艾司西酞普兰治疗绝经后女性重性抑郁障碍。
Menopause. 2010 Jul;17(4):700-11. doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e3181d88962.
10
Clinical implications of directly switching antidepressants in well-treated depressed patients with treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction: a comparison between vortioxetine and escitalopram.治疗中出现性功能障碍的抑郁患者直接转换使用抗抑郁药的临床意义:沃替西汀与艾司西酞普兰的比较。
CNS Spectr. 2020 Feb;25(1):50-63. doi: 10.1017/S1092852919000750.

引用本文的文献

1
Insights on the cognitive enhancement effect of desvenlafaxine in major depressive disorder.度洛西汀对重度抑郁症认知增强作用的见解。
Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 19;24(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12991-025-00552-2.
2
Effectiveness of Buspirone in Alleviating Anxiety Symptoms in Patients with Depressive Disorder: A Multicenter Prospective Observational Study in Korea.丁螺环酮缓解抑郁症患者焦虑症状的有效性:韩国一项多中心前瞻性观察研究
Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2025 Feb 28;23(1):144-154. doi: 10.9758/cpn.24.1255. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
3
The Potential Role of Aripiprazole Augmentation for Major Depressive Disorder with Anxious Distress in Naturalistic Treatment Setting.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 21 antidepressant drugs for the acute treatment of adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.21 种抗抑郁药治疗成人重度抑郁症的急性治疗的疗效和可接受性比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2018 Apr 7;391(10128):1357-1366. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32802-7. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
2
Korean Medication Algorithm for Depressive Disorders 2017: Third Revision.《2017年韩国抑郁症药物治疗算法:第三次修订版》
Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2018 Feb 28;16(1):67-87. doi: 10.9758/cpn.2018.16.1.67.
3
A Korean validation study of the Clinically Useful Anxiety Outcome Scale: Comorbidity and differentiation of anxiety and depressive disorders.
阿立哌唑增效治疗伴焦虑痛苦的重度抑郁症在自然主义治疗环境中的潜在作用
Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2024 May 31;22(2):370-375. doi: 10.9758/cpn.23.1106. Epub 2024 Feb 4.
4
Current Understanding on Psilocybin for Major Depressive Disorder: A Review Focusing on Clinical Trials.对裸盖菇素治疗重度抑郁症的当前认识:一项聚焦于临床试验的综述
Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2024 May 31;22(2):222-231. doi: 10.9758/cpn.23.1134. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
5
The Role of Vortioxetine in the Treatment of Depressive Symptoms in General Hospital Psychiatry: A Case-Series and PRISMA-Compliant Systematic Review of the Literature.伏硫西汀在综合医院精神病学中治疗抑郁症状的作用:病例系列及符合PRISMA标准的文献系统评价
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 17;13(2):531. doi: 10.3390/jcm13020531.
6
Role of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors in the Treatment of Hypochondriasis: A Systematic Review.选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂在疑病症治疗中的作用:一项系统评价
Cureus. 2023 Sep 15;15(9):e45286. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45286. eCollection 2023 Sep.
7
Additional Clinical Benefit of Agomelatine Treatment for Major Depressive Disorder in Naturalistic Treatment Setting.阿戈美拉汀治疗自然主义治疗环境下的重度抑郁症的额外临床益处。
Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2023 Aug 31;21(3):594-598. doi: 10.9758/cpn.23.1060.
《临床实用焦虑结果量表》的韩国验证研究:焦虑症与抑郁症的共病情况及鉴别
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 12;12(6):e0179247. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179247. eCollection 2017.
4
The Safety, Tolerability and Risks Associated with the Use of Newer Generation Antidepressant Drugs: A Critical Review of the Literature.新一代抗抑郁药的使用安全性、耐受性和风险:文献综述的批判性评价。
Psychother Psychosom. 2016;85(5):270-88. doi: 10.1159/000447034. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
5
Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) 2016 Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Adults with Major Depressive Disorder: Section 3. Pharmacological Treatments.加拿大情绪与焦虑治疗网络(CANMAT)2016年成人重度抑郁症管理临床指南:第3节. 药物治疗。
Can J Psychiatry. 2016 Sep;61(9):540-60. doi: 10.1177/0706743716659417. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
6
A meta-analysis of the efficacy of vortioxetine in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and high levels of anxiety symptoms.对伏硫西汀治疗重度抑郁症(MDD)且焦虑症状水平较高患者疗效的荟萃分析。
J Affect Disord. 2016 Dec;206:140-150. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.07.015. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
7
Efficacy and safety of escitalopram versus desvenlafaxine in the treatment of major depression: A preliminary 1-year prospective randomized open label comparative trial.艾司西酞普兰与去甲文拉法辛治疗重度抑郁症的疗效与安全性:一项为期1年的初步前瞻性随机开放标签对照试验。
Perspect Clin Res. 2016 Jan-Mar;7(1):45-50. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.173771.
8
Vortioxetine for major depressive disorder: An indirect comparison with duloxetine, escitalopram, levomilnacipran, sertraline, venlafaxine, and vilazodone, using number needed to treat, number needed to harm, and likelihood to be helped or harmed.伏硫西汀治疗重度抑郁症:与度洛西汀、艾司西酞普兰、左旋米那普明、舍曲林、文拉法辛和维拉唑酮的间接比较,采用治疗所需人数、伤害所需人数以及获益或伤害可能性进行分析
J Affect Disord. 2016 May 15;196:225-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.02.042. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
9
Effect of Vortioxetine vs. Escitalopram on Sexual Functioning in Adults with Well-Treated Major Depressive Disorder Experiencing SSRI-Induced Sexual Dysfunction.伏硫西汀与艾司西酞普兰对已接受充分治疗但出现SSRI诱导性功能障碍的成人重度抑郁症患者性功能的影响。
J Sex Med. 2015 Oct;12(10):2036-48. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12980. Epub 2015 Aug 31.
10
Relative efficacy and tolerability of vortioxetine versus selected antidepressants by indirect comparisons of similar clinical studies.通过相似临床研究的间接比较,伏硫西汀与选定抗抑郁药的相对疗效和耐受性
Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Dec;30(12):2589-606. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.969566. Epub 2014 Oct 10.