• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髌股内侧支持带重建术中髌前锚钉固定移植物与经髌腱隧道移植物治疗复发性髌骨脱位的比较:一项荟萃分析比较研究的方案。

Comparison of patellar anchor fixation graft and graft through patellar tunnel reconstruction of medial patellofemoral ligament in the treatment of recurrent patellar dislocation: A protocol for a meta-analysis of comparative studies.

机构信息

Youyang Hospital, A Branch of The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing City, China.

Kunming Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Kunming City, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Jan 20;102(3):e32467. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032467.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000032467
PMID:36701716
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9857251/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recurrent patellar dislocation (RPD) occurs in people who have their own patellofemoral dysplasia and who have not been properly treated after their first patellar dislocation. For RPD where conservative treatment is ineffective, medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is the first choice for surgical treatment, but there are various and controversial ways of MPFL reconstruction and fixation. Initially, more scholars adopted the patellar lateral tunneling (PT) approach to contain and stabilize the graft, but with the newer materials and techniques, some experts adopted the lateral patellar anchor fixation (AF) of the graft, which can avoid the collateral damage caused by the patellar lateral tunneling and can obtain the same definite efficacy. Therefore, a meta-analysis must be performed to provide evidence whether there is a difference between AF and PT reconstruction of the MPFL in the treatment of RPD.

METHODS

We will search, with no time restriction, without any restriction of language and status, the time from the establishment of the database to October 2022, on the following databases: PubMed (MEDLINE), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data (WF), Chinese Scientific Journals Database (VIP), and Chinese databases SinoMed (CBM) electronic databases. The electronic database search will be supplemented by a manual search of the reference lists of included articles. We will apply the risk-of-bias tool of the Cochrane Collaboration for randomized controlled trials to assess the methodological quality. Risk-of-Bias Assessment Tool for Non-randomized Studies was used to evaluate the quality of comparative studies. Statistical analysis will be conducted using RevMan 5.4 software.

RESULTS

This systematic review and meta-analysis will evaluate the functional outcomes of the two fixation modalities, AF and PT, in reconstructing MPFL for RPD.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study will provide a basis for clinical judgment of whether there is a difference between the two forms of AF and PT reconstructed MPFL for RPD.

摘要

背景

复发性髌骨脱位(RPD)发生在有髌骨股骨发育不良且初次髌骨脱位后未得到适当治疗的人群中。对于保守治疗无效的 RPD,内侧髌股韧带(MPFL)重建是首选的手术治疗方法,但 MPFL 重建和固定的方法有很多且存在争议。最初,更多的学者采用髌骨外侧隧道(PT)入路来包含和稳定移植物,但随着新材料和新技术的出现,一些专家采用了外侧髌骨锚定固定(AF)的移植物,这可以避免髌骨外侧隧道引起的侧副损伤,并能获得相同的明确疗效。因此,必须进行荟萃分析,以提供证据,证明在治疗 RPD 中,AF 和 PT 重建 MPFL 是否存在差异。

方法

我们将不设时间限制,不限制语言和状态,从数据库建立到 2022 年 10 月,在以下数据库中进行搜索:PubMed(MEDLINE)、Cochrane 中央对照试验注册库(CENTRAL)、Web of Science、中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI)、万方数据(WF)、中国科学期刊数据库(VIP)和中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)电子数据库。电子数据库搜索将辅以纳入文献的参考文献列表的手动搜索。我们将使用 Cochrane 协作的随机对照试验风险偏倚工具来评估方法学质量。非随机研究的风险偏倚评估工具用于评估比较研究的质量。统计分析将使用 RevMan 5.4 软件进行。

结果

本系统评价和荟萃分析将评估两种固定方式(AF 和 PT)在 RPD 中重建 MPFL 的功能结果。

结论

本研究的结果将为临床判断 RPD 中两种形式的 AF 和 PT 重建的 MPFL 是否存在差异提供依据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7217/9857251/f7046073c931/medi-102-e32467-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7217/9857251/f7046073c931/medi-102-e32467-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7217/9857251/f7046073c931/medi-102-e32467-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of patellar anchor fixation graft and graft through patellar tunnel reconstruction of medial patellofemoral ligament in the treatment of recurrent patellar dislocation: A protocol for a meta-analysis of comparative studies.髌股内侧支持带重建术中髌前锚钉固定移植物与经髌腱隧道移植物治疗复发性髌骨脱位的比较:一项荟萃分析比较研究的方案。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Jan 20;102(3):e32467. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032467.
2
Double-Limb Graft Versus Single-Limb Graft Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction for Recurrent Patellar Dislocation: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies.双束移植与单束移植内侧髌股韧带重建治疗复发性髌骨脱位:随机对照试验和队列研究的Meta分析
Am J Sports Med. 2023 Oct;51(12):3313-3324. doi: 10.1177/03635465221130448. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
3
Isolated medial patellofemoral reconstruction outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.孤立性内侧髌股韧带重建的结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Knee. 2023 Oct;44:59-71. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2023.07.003. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
4
Dynamic versus static medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction technique in the treatment of recurrent patellar dislocation: a randomized clinical trial protocol.动态与静态内侧髌股韧带重建技术治疗复发性髌骨脱位的随机临床试验方案。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Jul 10;17(1):345. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03158-6.
5
Derotational distal femoral osteotomy improves subjective function and patellar tracking after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction in recurrent patellar dislocation patients with increased femoral anteversion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.旋转远端股骨截骨术可改善复发性髌骨脱位患者中内侧髌股韧带重建术后因股骨前倾角增加导致的主观功能和髌骨轨迹不良:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2024 Jan;32(1):151-166. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12021. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
6
Inconsistencies in Reporting Risk Factors for Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Failure: A Systematic Review.报告内侧髌股韧带重建失败风险因素的不一致性:系统评价。
Am J Sports Med. 2022 Mar;50(3):867-877. doi: 10.1177/03635465211003342. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
7
Recurrent Patellar Dislocations Without Untreated Predisposing Factors: Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Versus Other Medial Soft-Tissue Surgical Techniques-A Meta-analysis.复发性髌骨脱位且无未治疗的诱发因素:内侧髌股韧带重建与其他内侧软组织手术技术的比较——一项荟萃分析。
Arthroscopy. 2020 Jun;36(6):1725-1734. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.12.029. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
8
Isolated MPTL reconstruction fails to restore lateral patellar stability when compared to MPFL reconstruction.与髌股韧带(MPFL)重建相比,单独的内侧髌股韧带(MPTL)重建无法恢复髌骨外侧稳定性。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Mar;29(3):793-799. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06015-3. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
9
Patellar Redislocation Rates and Clinical Outcomes After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: Suture Anchor Versus Double Transpatellar Tunnel Fixation.髌股关节再脱位率和内侧髌股韧带重建后的临床结果:缝线锚钉与双髌腱隧道固定的比较。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Apr;47(5):1254-1262. doi: 10.1177/0363546518765458. Epub 2018 May 3.
10
Medial patellar ligament reconstruction in combination with derotational distal femoral osteotomy for treating recurrent patellar dislocation in the presence of increased femoral anteversion: a systematic review.内侧髌韧带重建联合股骨远端旋转截骨术治疗伴有股骨前倾角增大的复发性髌骨脱位:系统评价。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Apr 6;19(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04709-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Anatomic physeal-sparing MPFL reconstruction in skeletally immature patients shows favourable outcomes at a minimum of 24-month follow-up.在骨骼未成熟患者中进行保留解剖学生长板的内侧髌股韧带重建,至少随访24个月时显示出良好的结果。
J Exp Orthop. 2024 Oct 22;11(4):e70063. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70063. eCollection 2024 Oct.