Suppr超能文献

重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(rTPA)治疗伴 COVID-19 和不伴 COVID-19 的首发急性缺血性脑卒中患者。

Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rTPA) management for first onset acute ischemic stroke with covid -19 and non-covid -19 patients.

机构信息

Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.

Department of Neuropsychiatry, Aswan University, Aswan, Egypt.

出版信息

J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2023 Apr;32(4):107031. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2023.107031. Epub 2023 Jan 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Cerebrovascular stroke (CVS) is one of the well-known complications of coronavirus-2019 (Covid-19), but less is known about the outcome and safety of thrombolytic therapy in these patients. In this study we compare the efficacy and safety of Tissue plasminogen activator (rTPA) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with or without Covid-19 infection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comparative prospective study in which all patients who presented with AIS and eligible for rTPA were recruited from the emergency department and classified into 2 groups (AIS with Covid-19 infection and AIS without Covid-19 as controls). Demographic data, symptoms of Covid-19, clinical examination, neuroimaging, and laboratory investigations were obtained in each patient. National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) were assessed before, immediately after rTPA, and 3 months later.

RESULTS

There were 22 patients in the COVID-19 group and 25 control patients. Those with COVID-19 were more likely to have a history of smoking and Diabetes Mellitus than controls. On admission, motor symptoms were more severe in patients with COVID-19. COVID-19 patients were more likely to have symptomatic intra-cerebral hemorrhage and radiological hemorrhagic transformation than controls. Onset to door time (ODT) and onset to successful reperfusion time were significantly longer in Covid-19 patients than controls. Clinical improvement and frequency of re-occlusion and recurrent ischemic stroke at 3 months follow-up did not differ between groups, although there was higher number of deaths (27.3%) in the Covid-19 group than controls (16%).

CONCLUSIONS

Using rTPA is safe and effective in patients with AIS with or without COVID-19 infection despite the high frequency of hemorrhagic transformation and high number of deaths.

摘要

目的

脑血管意外(CVS)是新冠病毒(Covid-19)的一种常见并发症,但关于这些患者溶栓治疗的效果和安全性知之甚少。本研究比较了伴有和不伴有新冠病毒感染的急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS)患者使用组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(rTPA)的疗效和安全性。

材料和方法

这是一项比较性前瞻性研究,从急诊科招募所有符合 rTPA 治疗条件的 AIS 患者,并将其分为两组(伴有新冠病毒感染的 AIS 患者和无新冠病毒感染的 AIS 对照组)。每位患者均记录人口统计学数据、新冠病毒症状、临床检查、神经影像学和实验室检查结果。在 rTPA 治疗前、治疗即刻和 3 个月后,采用美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)和改良 Rankin 量表(mRS)进行评估。

结果

COVID-19 组有 22 例患者,对照组有 25 例患者。与对照组相比,COVID-19 组患者更有可能有吸烟和糖尿病病史。入院时,COVID-19 组患者的运动症状更严重。COVID-19 组患者更有可能出现症状性颅内出血和影像学出血性转化。与对照组相比,COVID-19 组患者的发病至门时间(ODT)和发病至成功再灌注时间显著延长。3 个月随访时,临床改善情况、再闭塞和复发性缺血性卒中的发生率在两组之间没有差异,尽管 COVID-19 组的死亡率(27.3%)高于对照组(16%)。

结论

尽管 COVID-19 组患者的出血性转化发生率较高,死亡率较高,但 rTPA 治疗伴有和不伴有 COVID-19 感染的 AIS 患者是安全有效的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d31/9868389/fbba4587a008/gr1_lrg.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验