OrthoCarolina-Hip & Knee Center, Charlotte, North Carolina.
OrthoCarolina-Hip & Knee Center, Charlotte, North Carolina; Atrium Health-Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina.
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jul;38(7):1369-1372. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.01.017. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
Periprosthetic infection is a devastating complication following total knee arthroplasty. A 2-stage protocol often includes an interim antibiotic spacer with intramedullary (IM) dowels. However, the necessity of IM dowels has recently been challenged. Specifically, the data supporting bacterial colonization of the IM canal are limited and controversial. The purpose of this study was to identify the rate of positive IM cultures during resection arthroplasty in periprosthetic knee infection.
A total of 66 IM diaphyseal cultures were taken during resection arthroplasty from 34 patients diagnosed with periprosthetic knee infection. These IM cultures were taken from the femoral and tibial canals using separate sterile instruments. All patients had infected primary total knee arthroplasty implants at the time of resection.
Thirty one percent (n = 21) of IM canal cultures in this study were positive from either the tibial or the femoral diaphysis at the time of resection arthroplasty. There were 18 of 21 (86%) of the positive IM canal cultures with concordant intraoperative joint cultures where the IM cultures matched the intraarticular cultures.
With a 31% positive IM canal culture rate, this study confirms the logic of using IM dowels with an antibiotic spacer to treat periprosthetic knee infection. Since the failure of a 2-stage reimplantation is catastrophic, any attempt to provide additional local antibiotic delivery seems warranted. Since nearly one-third of our patients had positive IM cultures, this simple addition to an antibiotic spacer has the potential to improve 2-stage results. Claims supporting the elimination of IM dowels during resection arthroplasty seem ill-advised.
人工膝关节置换术后发生假体周围感染是一种灾难性的并发症。两阶段方案通常包括带有髓内(IM)栓的临时抗生素间隔物。然而,最近对 IM 栓的必要性提出了质疑。具体来说,支持 IM 管内细菌定植的数据有限且存在争议。本研究的目的是确定在假体周围膝关节感染的关节切除术中,IM 培养物阳性的发生率。
在 34 名诊断为假体周围膝关节感染的患者的关节切除术中,共采集了 66 个 IM 骨干培养物。这些 IM 培养物是使用单独的无菌器械从股骨和胫骨管中采集的。所有患者在切除时均有感染的初次全膝关节置换植入物。
在这项研究中,31%(n=21)的 IM 管腔培养物在关节切除时来自胫骨或股骨骨干,在 21 个阳性 IM 管腔培养物中有 18 个(86%)与术中关节培养物一致,其中 IM 培养物与关节内培养物相符。
这项研究以 31%的 IM 管腔阳性培养率证实了在抗生素间隔物中使用 IM 栓治疗假体周围膝关节感染的逻辑。由于两阶段再植入失败是灾难性的,因此任何试图提供额外局部抗生素递送的尝试似乎都是合理的。由于近三分之一的患者存在 IM 培养物阳性,因此这种在抗生素间隔物上的简单添加有可能改善两阶段结果。支持在关节切除术中消除 IM 栓的说法似乎是不明智的。