• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髓内阳性组织培养增加一期感染性翻修全膝关节置换术后再感染的风险。

Intramedullary Positive Tissue Culture Increases the Risk of Reinfection Following One-Stage Septic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Helios ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Santa Maria Annunziata Hospital, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Bagno A Ripoli (FI), Italy.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Helios ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2024 Aug;39(8):2094-2099. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.02.053. Epub 2024 Feb 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2024.02.053
PMID:38403076
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative acquisition of representative tissue samples is essential during revision arthroplasty of the infected total knee arthroplasty (TKA). While the number of intraoperative tissue samples needed to identify the organism is well described in the literature, there is still a paucity of evidence regarding the location of positive intraoperative samples and their correlation to postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

There were forty-two patients who had septic failure following one-stage revision TKA for periprosthetic joint infection who were identified between January 2009 and December 2017. They were matched to a control group of patients who had successful one-stage revision TKA without septic failure. The location of positive intraoperative tissue samples was categorized as: 1) soft tissue; 2) interface between bone and prosthesis; and 3) intramedullary (IM). Chi-square, Student's t-, and Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney U-tests were used as appropriate. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate predictors of septic failure.

RESULTS

Weight > 100 kilograms (P = .033), higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (P < .001), and positive IM cultures (P < .001) were associated with a higher risk of reinfection after one-stage revision TKA. A positive IM sample carried a nearly five-fold increase in odds of reinfection (odds ratio 4.86, 95% confidence interval 1.85 to 12.78, P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

A positive IM culture sample is significantly associated with septic failure after one-stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infection of the knee. Patients who had positive IM cultures may benefit from longer postoperative antibiotic therapy for the treatment of one-stage exchange arthroplasty to minimize the risk of reinfection.

摘要

背景

在感染性全膝关节置换术(TKA)的翻修过程中,获取有代表性的组织样本是至关重要的。虽然文献中已经很好地描述了确定病原体所需的术中组织样本数量,但关于阳性术中样本的位置及其与术后结果的相关性,仍缺乏证据。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 2009 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月期间因假体周围关节感染行一期翻修 TKA 后发生感染失败的 42 例患者,并与同期行一期翻修 TKA 且无感染失败的对照组患者进行匹配。将阳性术中组织样本的位置分为:1)软组织;2)骨与假体界面;3)髓内(IM)。使用卡方检验、Student's t 检验和 Wilcoxon 秩和检验。采用单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析评估感染失败的预测因素。

结果

体重>100 公斤(P=0.033)、Charlson 合并症指数较高(P<0.001)和 IM 培养阳性(P<0.001)与一期翻修 TKA 后再感染的风险增加相关。IM 样本阳性与再感染的可能性增加近五倍(比值比 4.86,95%置信区间 1.85 至 12.78,P=0.001)。

结论

IM 培养阳性样本与膝关节假体周围感染一期翻修后感染失败显著相关。IM 培养阳性的患者可能受益于更长时间的术后抗生素治疗,以降低一期翻修关节置换术的再感染风险。

相似文献

1
Intramedullary Positive Tissue Culture Increases the Risk of Reinfection Following One-Stage Septic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.髓内阳性组织培养增加一期感染性翻修全膝关节置换术后再感染的风险。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Aug;39(8):2094-2099. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.02.053. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
2
Risk factors for early septic failure after two-stage exchange total knee arthroplasty for treatment of periprosthetic joint infection.二期翻修治疗假体周围关节感染的全膝关节置换术后早期败血症失败的危险因素。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2024 Feb 12;25(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s10195-024-00750-w.
3
High revision rates following repeat septic revision after failed one-stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infection in total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后一期翻修失败的假体周围关节感染行重复清创翻修后高返修率。
Bone Joint J. 2022 Mar;104-B(3):386-393. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B3.BJJ-2021-0481.R2.
4
Comparison of two-stage revision arthroplasty and intramedullary arthrodesis in patients with failed infected knee arthroplasty.感染性膝关节置换失败患者的两阶段翻修关节成形术与髓内关节固定术的比较
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018 Oct;138(10):1443-1452. doi: 10.1007/s00402-018-3007-9. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
5
Management of Chronically Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty With Severe Bone Loss Using Static Spacers With Intramedullary Rods.采用带髓内杆的静态间隔器治疗严重骨丢失的慢性感染全膝关节置换术的管理。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jul;34(7):1462-1469. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.053. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
6
Outcomes of rotating versus pure hinge knee arthroplasty in the setting of one-stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infection.一期翻修治疗人工关节周围感染中旋转铰链膝关节置换与单纯铰链膝关节置换的结果比较。
Int Orthop. 2024 Jul;48(7):1751-1759. doi: 10.1007/s00264-024-06139-y. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
7
Risk Factors for Failure After 1-Stage Exchange Total Knee Arthroplasty in the Management of Periprosthetic Joint Infection.一期翻修治疗假体周围关节感染后失败的风险因素。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Jun 19;101(12):1061-1069. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00947.
8
Revision TKA with a distal femoral replacement is at high risk of reinfection after two-stage exchange for periprosthetic knee joint infection.对于膝关节假体周围感染的二期翻修,采用股骨远端置换的翻修 TKA 具有很高的再感染风险。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Mar;30(3):899-906. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06474-2. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
9
High Rate of Intramedullary Canal Culture Positivity in Total Knee Arthroplasty Resection for Prosthetic Joint Infection.全膝关节置换术治疗假体关节感染时,髓腔内培养阳性率较高。
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jul;38(7):1369-1372. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.01.017. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
10
Irrigation, Débridement, and Implant Retention for Recurrence of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Two-Stage Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Matched Cohort Study.一期翻修治疗全膝关节置换术后假体周围感染翻修术后复发的冲洗、清创和假体保留:一项匹配队列研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Aug;34(8):1772-1775. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.04.009. Epub 2019 Apr 10.