• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤性脑损伤住院儿童临床脑自动调节测试的经验:将研究转化为床边实践

Experience with clinical cerebral autoregulation testing in children hospitalized with traumatic brain injury: Translating research to bedside.

作者信息

Kunapaisal Thitikan, Moore Anne, Theard Marie A, King Mary A, Chesnut Randall M, Vavilala Monica S, Lele Abhijit V

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.

Harborview Injury Prevention, and Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.

出版信息

Front Pediatr. 2023 Jan 10;10:1072851. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.1072851. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fped.2022.1072851
PMID:36704136
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9871541/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To report our institutional experience with implementing a clinical cerebral autoregulation testing order set with protocol in children hospitalized with traumatic brain injury (TBI).

METHODS

After IRB approval, we examined clinical use, patient characteristics, feasibility, and safety of cerebral autoregulation testing in children aged <18 years between 2014 and 2021. A clinical order set with a protocol for cerebral autoregulation testing was introduced in 2018.

RESULTS

25 (24 severe TBI and 1 mild TBI) children, median age 13 years [IQR 4.5; 15] and median admission GCS 3[IQR 3; 3.5]) underwent 61 cerebral autoregulation tests during the first 16 days after admission [IQR1.5; 7; range 0-16]. Testing was more common after implementation of the order set ( = 16, 64% after the order set vs.  = 9, 36% before the order set) and initiated during the first 2 days. During testing, patients were mechanically ventilated ( = 60, 98.4%), had invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring ( = 60, 98.4%), had intracranial pressure monitoring ( = 56, 90.3%), brain-tissue oxygenation monitoring ( = 56, 90.3%), and external ventricular drain ( = 13, 25.5%). Most patients received sedation and analgesia for intracranial pressure control ( = 52; 83.8%) and vasoactive support ( = 55, 90.2%) during testing. Cerebral autoregulation testing was completed in 82% ( = 50 tests); 11 tests were not completed [high intracranial pressure ( = 5), high blood pressure ( = 2), bradycardia ( = 2), low cerebral perfusion pressure ( = 1), or intolerance to blood pressure cuff inflation ( = 1)]. Impaired cerebral autoregulation on first assessment resulted in repeat testing (80% impaired vs. 23% intact, RR 2.93, 95% CI 1.06:8.08, = 0.03). Seven out of 50 tests (14%) resulted in a change in cerebral hemodynamic targets.

CONCLUSION

Findings from this series of children with TBI indicate that: (1) Availability of clinical order set with protocol facilitated clinical cerebral autoregulation testing, (2) Clinicians ordered cerebral autoregulation tests in children with severe TBI receiving high therapeutic intensity and repeatedly with impaired status on the first test, (3) Clinical cerebral autoregulation testing is feasible and safe, and (4) Testing results led to change in hemodynamic targets in some patients.

摘要

目的

报告我们在为创伤性脑损伤(TBI)住院儿童实施临床脑自动调节测试医嘱集及方案方面的机构经验。

方法

经机构审查委员会(IRB)批准,我们研究了2014年至2021年间18岁以下儿童脑自动调节测试的临床应用、患者特征、可行性和安全性。2018年引入了一套包含脑自动调节测试方案的临床医嘱集。

结果

25名(24名重度TBI和1名轻度TBI)儿童,中位年龄13岁[四分位间距(IQR)4.5;15],入院时格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)中位数为3[IQR 3;3.5],在入院后的前16天内接受了61次脑自动调节测试[IQR 1.5;7;范围0 - 16]。医嘱集实施后测试更为常见(n = 16,医嘱集实施后占64%,而医嘱集实施前n = 9,占36%),且在最初2天内开始。测试期间,患者接受机械通气(n = 60,98.4%)、有创动脉血压监测(n = 60,98.4%)、颅内压监测(n = 56,90.3%)、脑组织氧合监测(n = 56,90.3%)以及外置脑室引流(n = 13,25.5%)。大多数患者在测试期间接受了用于控制颅内压的镇静和镇痛(n = 52;83.8%)以及血管活性支持(n = 55,90.2%)。82%(n = 50次测试)完成了脑自动调节测试;11次测试未完成[颅内压高(n = 5)、血压高(n = 2)、心动过缓(n = 2)、脑灌注压低(n = 1)或对血压袖带充气不耐受(n = 1)]。首次评估时脑自动调节受损导致重复测试(受损者80%,正常者23%,相对危险度2.93,95%置信区间1.06:8.08,P = 0.03)。50次测试中有7次(14%)导致脑血流动力学目标发生改变。

结论

这一系列TBI儿童的研究结果表明:(1)带有方案的临床医嘱集便于临床脑自动调节测试;(2)临床医生对接受高治疗强度且首次测试时状态受损的重度TBI儿童进行脑自动调节测试,且多次测试;(3)临床脑自动调节测试是可行且安全的;(4)测试结果导致部分患者的血流动力学目标发生改变。

相似文献

1
Experience with clinical cerebral autoregulation testing in children hospitalized with traumatic brain injury: Translating research to bedside.创伤性脑损伤住院儿童临床脑自动调节测试的经验:将研究转化为床边实践
Front Pediatr. 2023 Jan 10;10:1072851. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.1072851. eCollection 2022.
2
Critical Care Experience With Clinical Cerebral Autoregulation Testing in Adults With Traumatic Brain Injury.成人创伤性脑损伤患者临床脑自动调节测试的重症监护经验
Cureus. 2023 Aug 14;15(8):e43451. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43451. eCollection 2023 Aug.
3
Pressure autoregulation, intracranial pressure, and brain tissue oxygenation in children with severe traumatic brain injury.重型颅脑损伤患儿的压力自动调节、颅内压及脑组织氧合
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2009 Nov;4(5):420-8. doi: 10.3171/2009.6.PEDS096.
4
Prevalence, Evolution, and Extent of Impaired Cerebral Autoregulation in Children Hospitalized With Complex Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.复杂轻度创伤性脑损伤住院儿童的脑自动调节功能障碍的患病率、演变和程度。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019 Apr;20(4):372-378. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001824.
5
Incorporating a parenchymal thermal diffusion cerebral blood flow probe in bedside assessment of cerebral autoregulation and vasoreactivity in patients with severe traumatic brain injury.在严重创伤性脑损伤患者的床边评估中,将实质热扩散脑血流探头纳入脑自动调节和血管反应性的评估。
J Neurosurg. 2011 Jan;114(1):62-70. doi: 10.3171/2010.6.JNS091360. Epub 2010 Aug 13.
6
Cerebral hemodynamic predictors of poor 6-month Glasgow Outcome Score in severe pediatric traumatic brain injury.小儿重度创伤性脑损伤6个月时格拉斯哥预后评分不良的脑血流动力学预测因素
J Neurotrauma. 2009 May;26(5):657-63. doi: 10.1089/neu.2008.0770.
7
Pressure autoregulation monitoring and cerebral perfusion pressure target recommendation in patients with severe traumatic brain injury based on minute-by-minute monitoring data.基于逐分钟监测数据的重型颅脑损伤患者压力自动调节监测及脑灌注压目标推荐
J Neurosurg. 2014 Jun;120(6):1451-7. doi: 10.3171/2014.3.JNS131500. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
8
Cerebral pressure autoregulation is intact and is not influenced by hypothermia after traumatic brain injury in rats.大鼠创伤性脑损伤后,脑压自动调节功能完好,且不受低温影响。
J Neurotrauma. 2004 Sep;21(9):1212-22. doi: 10.1089/neu.2004.21.1212.
9
Hemispheric differences in cerebral autoregulation in children with moderate and severe traumatic brain injury.中重度创伤性脑损伤患儿脑自动调节的半球差异。
Neurocrit Care. 2008;9(1):45-54. doi: 10.1007/s12028-007-9036-9.
10
Change in cerebral autoregulation as a function of time in children after severe traumatic brain injury: a case series.重度创伤性脑损伤患儿脑自动调节功能随时间的变化:病例系列研究
Childs Nerv Syst. 2007 Oct;23(10):1163-9. doi: 10.1007/s00381-007-0339-0. Epub 2007 Apr 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Applications of Point-of-Care and Diagnostic Transcranial Doppler in the Pediatric Acute Care Setting: A Scoping Review.即时护理和诊断性经颅多普勒在儿科急性护理环境中的临床应用:一项范围综述
Neurocrit Care. 2025 Aug 25. doi: 10.1007/s12028-025-02341-x.
2
Critical Care Experience With Clinical Cerebral Autoregulation Testing in Adults With Traumatic Brain Injury.成人创伤性脑损伤患者临床脑自动调节测试的重症监护经验
Cureus. 2023 Aug 14;15(8):e43451. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43451. eCollection 2023 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Cerebral Autoregulation in Healthy Term Newborns: Brief Report.
Pediatr Neurol. 2022 Oct;135:4-5. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2022.07.001. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
2
A Pilot Prospective Observational Study of Cerebral Autoregulation and 12-Month Outcomes in Children With Complex Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: The Argument for Sufficiency Conditions Affecting TBI Outcomes.一项关于复杂性轻度创伤性脑损伤儿童脑自动调节和 12 个月结局的前瞻性观察性研究:充足条件影响 TBI 结局的论据。
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2022 Oct 1;34(4):384-391. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000775. Epub 2021 May 3.
3
Prevalence, Evolution, and Extent of Impaired Cerebral Autoregulation in Children Hospitalized With Complex Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.复杂轻度创伤性脑损伤住院儿童的脑自动调节功能障碍的患病率、演变和程度。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019 Apr;20(4):372-378. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001824.
4
The Pediatric Guideline Adherence and Outcomes (PEGASUS) programme in severe traumatic brain injury: a single-centre hybrid implementation and effectiveness study.小儿严重创伤性脑损伤指南依从性和结局(PEGASUS)研究:单中心混合实施和效果研究。
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2019 Jan;3(1):23-34. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30341-9. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
5
Respiratory Management in Patients with Severe Brain Injury.严重脑损伤患者的呼吸管理。
Crit Care. 2018 Mar 20;22(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-1994-0.
6
Early changes in cerebral autoregulation among youth hospitalized after sports-related traumatic brain injury.与运动相关的创伤性脑损伤后住院青年的脑自动调节早期变化。
Brain Inj. 2018;32(2):269-275. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2017.1408145. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
7
Cerebral Autoregulation-oriented Therapy at the Bedside: A Comprehensive Review.床边脑自动调节导向治疗:综述
Anesthesiology. 2017 Jun;126(6):1187-1199. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001625.
8
The physician's experience of changing clinical practice: a struggle to unlearn.医生改变临床实践的经历:一场艰难的摒弃旧习之旅。
Implement Sci. 2017 Feb 28;12(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0555-2.
9
Cerebral Blood Flow Autoregulation and Dysautoregulation.脑血流自动调节与调节异常
Anesthesiol Clin. 2016 Sep;34(3):465-77. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2016.04.002.
10
Transcranial Doppler-based assessment of cerebral autoregulation in critically ill children during diabetic ketoacidosis treatment.基于经颅多普勒的危重症儿童糖尿病酮症酸中毒治疗期间脑自动调节功能评估
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014 Oct;15(8):742-9. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000197.