Zhang Hengle, Wang Zunyi, Liu Wei, Wang Peng, Zhang Xiaoyu
Graduate School of Hebei Medical University, Cangzhou Central Hospital Affiliated to Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, China.
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2023 Jan 17;2023:5431563. doi: 10.1155/2023/5431563. eCollection 2023.
The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and prognosis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) combined with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in treating triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and analyze the influencing factors and predictors of the efficiency and prognosis of NAC.
A retrospective cohort study was conducted by dividing patients into two groups according to two different therapy methods. With BCS as the exposure factor, 46 cases were assigned to the exposed group and 80 cases to the nonexposed group. We compare the difference in operation-related indicators, postoperative complications, local recurrence rate, distant metastasis rate, and overall survival (OS) rate between the two groups. The factors affecting the efficiency and prognosis of NAC were analyzed by binary logistic regression, and the optimal cutoff value was determined by the area under the ROC curve (AUC). The survival curve was plotted, and the univariate log-rank test was performed to analyze the difference in OS between the two groups. The influencing factors of OS were analyzed by the Cox risk regression model.
NAC + BCS resulted in significantly less intraoperative blood loss, lower incidence of postoperative complications, and shorter operative time and length of hospital stay than that in NAC ( < 0.05). There was no significant difference in local recurrence, distant metastasis, or OS between the two groups ( > 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that the clinical stage I and Ki-67 high expression were independent protective factors of the efficacy of NAC. The high expression of Ki-67 and nondecline expression of Ki-67 were independent risk factors of prognosis. Ki-67 high expression was an independent risk factor of OS ( < 0.05). The ROC curve showed that the AUC of Ki-67 for NAC efficacy, prognosis, and OS were 0.706, 0.820, and 0.687, respectively, with optimal cutoff values of 25.5%, 29.0%, and 32.5%, respectively. Survival analysis showed that the OS of patients with NAC + BCS was 73.9% and NAC + MRM was 70.0% ( > 0.05). In the low expression subgroup of Ki-67, the OS of the two groups were 100.0% and 77.8%, respectively (=0.060). In the high expression subgroup of Ki-67, the OS of the two groups were 53.8% and 63.6%, respectively (=0.419).
NAC + BCS is a good method for treating TNBC, which has an obvious short-term effect and a good long-term prognosis. Clinical stage I and the high expression of Ki-67 are independent protective factors for the efficacy of NAC. The high expression of Ki-67 and nondecline expression of Ki-67 are independent risk factors of prognosis. Ki-67 is a potential predictor for the efficacy, prognosis, and OS of NAC in TNBC patients. The high expression of Ki-67 indicates better NAC efficacy, a poorer prognosis, and a lower OS.
本研究旨在评估新辅助化疗(NAC)联合保乳手术(BCS)治疗三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)的疗效及预后,并分析NAC疗效及预后的影响因素和预测指标。
采用回顾性队列研究,根据两种不同治疗方法将患者分为两组。以BCS为暴露因素,46例患者被分配至暴露组,80例患者被分配至非暴露组。比较两组手术相关指标、术后并发症、局部复发率、远处转移率及总生存(OS)率的差异。采用二元logistic回归分析影响NAC疗效及预后的因素,并通过ROC曲线下面积(AUC)确定最佳截断值。绘制生存曲线,进行单因素log-rank检验分析两组OS的差异。采用Cox风险回归模型分析OS的影响因素。
与NAC相比,NAC+BCS术中出血量显著减少,术后并发症发生率更低,手术时间和住院时间更短(<0.05)。两组在局部复发、远处转移或OS方面无显著差异(>0.05)。多因素分析显示,临床Ⅰ期和Ki-67高表达是NAC疗效的独立保护因素。Ki-67高表达和Ki-67无下降表达是预后的独立危险因素。Ki-67高表达是OS的独立危险因素(<0.05)。ROC曲线显示Ki-67对NAC疗效、预后和OS的AUC分别为0.706、0.820和0.687,最佳截断值分别为25.5%、29.0%和32.5%。生存分析显示,NAC+BCS患者的OS为73.9%,NAC+乳房切除术(MRM)患者的OS为70.0%(>0.05)。在Ki-67低表达亚组中,两组的OS分别为100.0%和77.8%(=0.060)。在Ki-67高表达亚组中,两组的OS分别为53.8%和63.6%(=0.419)。
NAC+BCS是治疗TNBC的良好方法,具有明显的短期效果和良好的长期预后。临床Ⅰ期和Ki-67高表达是NAC疗效的独立保护因素。Ki-67高表达和Ki-67无下降表达是预后的独立危险因素。Ki-67是TNBC患者NAC疗效、预后和OS的潜在预测指标。Ki-67高表达表明NAC疗效较好、预后较差和OS较低。