Quintessence Int. 2023 May 19;54(5):428-437. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.b3840763.
The objective was to evaluate oral health-related knowledge, and to compare the effectiveness of three different oral health education interventions (OHEI) on plaque removal in a cohort with Parkinson disease.
The three-arm, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial included 63 Parkinson disease stage 1 and 2 patients aged ≥ 40 years and scores ≥ 26 in both Montreal Cognitive Assessment test and Mini-Mental State Exam. These patients were allocated to three OHEI groups: lectures, presentation, and demonstration. The validated questionnaire assessed knowledge level at baseline (0), 1, 2, and 3 months. Oral hygiene at 0 and 3 months was assessed by the Plaque Index and the Patient Hygiene Performance Index (PHPI). Unstimulated whole saliva was collected to assess the salivary flow rate.
Pairwise comparison using ANOVA showed a significant decrease in mean percentage knowledge 0, 1, 2, and 3 months in all three groups (P < .001). After Tukey post-hoc analysis the presentation group had significantly higher knowledge (P = .030). ANOVA showed that the percentage of knowledge decreased as time passed (P = .001). Comparison of means of Plaque Index and PHPI scores by MANOVA followed by Tukey post-hoc analysis showed significant decrease in Plaque Index scores from 0 to 3 months (P = .001). No significant change in the salivary flow rate was noted.
Pictorial representation of OHEI is a better mode of intervention compared to lectures and demonstrations in Parkinson disease stage 1 and 2 patients. Despite the decline in knowledge with time, Plaque Index scores reduced significantly, implying that this form OHEI offers positive benefits.
评估口腔健康相关知识,并比较三种不同口腔健康教育干预(OHEI)对帕金森病患者菌斑清除效果的影响。
这是一项三臂、平行组、随机对照试验,纳入了 63 名年龄≥40 岁、蒙特利尔认知评估测试和简易精神状态检查得分均≥26 分的 1 期和 2 期帕金森病患者。这些患者被分配到三个 OHEI 组:讲座、演示和示范。经验证的问卷在基线(0)、1、2 和 3 个月时评估知识水平。在 0 和 3 个月时使用菌斑指数和患者口腔卫生性能指数(PHPI)评估口腔卫生。收集未刺激的全唾液以评估唾液流率。
使用 ANOVA 进行两两比较显示,所有三组的知识得分在 0、1、2 和 3 个月时均呈显著下降(P<0.001)。经 Tukey 事后分析,演示组的知识得分显著更高(P=0.030)。ANOVA 显示知识得分随时间推移而下降(P=0.001)。通过 MANOVA 比较均值,再进行 Tukey 事后分析,结果显示菌斑指数评分从 0 到 3 个月显著下降(P=0.001)。唾液流率无显著变化。
与讲座和演示相比,帕金森病 1 期和 2 期患者的 OHEI 图像表示是一种更好的干预模式。尽管知识得分随时间下降,但菌斑指数评分显著降低,表明这种形式的 OHEI 带来了积极的益处。