Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma, Critical Care, and Burn, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
University of Toledo College of Medicine, Toledo, Ohio, USA.
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2023 Mar;24(2):169-176. doi: 10.1089/sur.2022.329. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
The impact of socioeconomic metrics on outcomes after sepsis is unclear. The Distressed Communities Index (DCI) is a composite score quantifying socioeconomic well-being by zip code. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the association between DCI and mortality in patients with sepsis admitted to the surgical intensive care unit (SICU). All patients with sepsis admitted to the SICU (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment [SOFA] score ≥2) were reviewed retrospectively. Composite DCI scores were obtained for each patient and classified into high-distress (DCI ≥75th percentile; n = 331) and control distress (DCI <50th percentile; n = 666) groups. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between groups. The primary outcomes were in-hospital and 90-day mortality. The high-distress cohort was younger and more likely to be African American (19.6% vs. 6.2%), transferred from an outside facility (52% vs. 42%), have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (25.1% vs. 18.8%), and baseline liver disease (8.2% vs. 4.2%). Sepsis presentation was comparable between groups. Compared with the control cohort, high-distress patients had similar in-house (23% vs. 24%) and 90-day mortality (30% vs. 28%) but were associated with longer hospital stay (23 vs. 19 days). High DCI failed to predict in-hospital or 90-day mortality but was an independent risk factor for longer hospital length of stay (odds ratio [OR], 2.83 ± 1.42; p = 0.047). High DCI was not associated with mortality but did independently predict longer length of stay. This may reflect limitations of DCI score in evaluating mortality for patients with sepsis. Future studies should elucidate its association with length of stay, re-admissions, and follow-up.
社会经济指标对脓毒症结局的影响尚不清楚。窘迫社区指数(DCI)是一种通过邮政编码量化社会经济福祉的综合评分。本研究的主要目的是评估 DCI 与入住外科重症监护病房(SICU)的脓毒症患者死亡率之间的关系。回顾性分析所有入住 SICU 的脓毒症患者(序贯器官衰竭评估[SOFA]评分≥2)。为每位患者获得综合 DCI 评分,并分为高压力组(DCI≥75 百分位;n=331)和控制压力组(DCI<50 百分位;n=666)。比较两组间的基线人口统计学和临床特征。主要结局为院内和 90 天死亡率。高压力组年龄更小,更可能为非裔美国人(19.6% vs. 6.2%),从外部医疗机构转入(52% vs. 42%),患有慢性阻塞性肺疾病(25.1% vs. 18.8%)和基础肝病(8.2% vs. 4.2%)。两组脓毒症的发病情况相似。与对照组相比,高压力组院内(23% vs. 24%)和 90 天死亡率(30% vs. 28%)相似,但住院时间更长(23 天 vs. 19 天)。高 DCI 不能预测院内或 90 天死亡率,但与住院时间延长独立相关(比值比[OR],2.83±1.42;p=0.047)。高 DCI 与死亡率无关,但独立预测住院时间延长。这可能反映了 DCI 评分在评估脓毒症患者死亡率方面的局限性。未来的研究应阐明其与住院时间、再入院和随访的关系。