Xu Hengtao, Li Li'ang, Wang Youji, Qiu Kecheng, Chen Siyang, Zeng Jiangning, Liu Ruijuan, Yang Qikun, Huang Wei
Key Laboratory of Marine Ecosystem Dynamics, Second Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Hangzhou 310012, China; Key Laboratory of Nearshore Engineering Environment and Ecological Security of Zhejiang Province, Second Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Hangzhou 310012, China.
Key Laboratory of Marine Ecosystem Dynamics, Second Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Hangzhou 310012, China; International Research Center for Marine Biosciences at Shanghai Ocean University, Ministry of Science and Technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China; Key Laboratory of Nearshore Engineering Environment and Ecological Security of Zhejiang Province, Second Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Hangzhou 310012, China; State Key Laboratory of Satellite Ocean Environment Dynamics, Second Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Hangzhou 310012, China.
J Hazard Mater. 2023 Apr 15;448:130814. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.130814. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
Effects of microplastics on microalgae have not been compared from different habitat. To answer this question, three marine microalgae species (Chlorella marined, Nannochloropsis oculate, and Phaeodactylum tricornutum) and two freshwater species (Chlorella vulgaris and Tetradesmus obliquus) were selected and exposed to the environment relevant concentrations of polystyrene microplastics. The results indicated that microplastics have a significant concentration effect on the growth of microalgae. The attachment of microalgae to microplastics surface and the aggregation of microalgae with each other were observed. Under exposure of microplastics, the photosynthesis of microalgae was inhibited while the antioxidant system was activated, indicating that microplastics had a negative impact on microalgae. At the end of exposure, the oxidative stress status caused by microplastics in marine microalgae were alleviated, but the antioxidant system of freshwater microalgae was still at high levels, indicating a stress response. In addition, integrated biomarker response (IBR) indicated that the effects of microplastics on freshwater microalgae were severer than marine microalgae, which might relate to their differences in removing reactive oxygen species (ROS) effectively and membrane structure. Our study provides a reliable data for understanding the complex effects of microplastics on microalgae, and especially for comparing the differential effects of microplastics among different microalgae.
微塑料对微藻的影响尚未在不同栖息地之间进行比较。为了回答这个问题,选取了三种海洋微藻物种(海洋小球藻、眼点拟微绿球藻和三角褐指藻)和两种淡水微藻物种(普通小球藻和斜生栅藻),并使其暴露于环境相关浓度的聚苯乙烯微塑料中。结果表明,微塑料对微藻的生长具有显著的浓度效应。观察到微藻附着在微塑料表面以及微藻彼此聚集的现象。在微塑料暴露下,微藻的光合作用受到抑制,而抗氧化系统被激活,这表明微塑料对微藻有负面影响。暴露结束时,海洋微藻中由微塑料引起的氧化应激状态得到缓解,但淡水微藻的抗氧化系统仍处于高水平,表明存在应激反应。此外,综合生物标志物响应(IBR)表明,微塑料对淡水微藻的影响比对海洋微藻更严重,这可能与其有效清除活性氧(ROS)的能力和膜结构差异有关。我们的研究为理解微塑料对微藻的复杂影响,尤其是比较微塑料在不同微藻之间的差异影响提供了可靠的数据。