Chen Jiajie, Xie Yu, Sun Shanshan, Zhang Manping, Yan Pan, Xu Feng, Tang Li, He Shengbing
School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, PR China.
School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, PR China; School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, PR China.
Environ Res. 2023 Apr 15;223:115375. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.115375. Epub 2023 Jan 26.
Three kinds of bioretention were designed to explore the effects of zero-valent iron (ZVI) and biochar on the nitrogen removal performance and to seek a more reasonable packing method in this study. The results showed that the effluent removal rates of nitrate, ammonium and total nitrogen were 53.30 ± 12.68%, 98.41 ± 0.38% and 64.03 ± 8.72% respectively in Bioretention-3 during the rainfall events, while the nitrate concentration decreased gradually with the increase of drying time. According to the batch experiment, it was found that zero-valent iron could release continuously and stably in Bioretention-3 and Bioretention-1 due to the interception effect of biochar on dissolved oxygen. In addition, biochar in soil layer could protect zero-valent iron from excessive oxidation while biochar in the substrate layer could release organic matter to promote heterotrophic denitrification. Microbial community analysis showed that the dominant phyla were Proteobacteria (20.92-40.81%) and Actinobacteriota (9.89-24.54%). The dominant nitrifying genera was Nitrospira while there were also aerobic denitrifying bacteria (Sphingomonas, Bradyrhizobium and Chryseolinea, etc.) in soil layer. In the substrate layer, there was more ferrous iron-mediated autotrophic denitrification process (Thiobacillus, Geobacter and Denitratisoma, etc.) in Bioretention-1 and Bioretention-3 while a larger proportion of Dissimilatory Nitrate Reduction to Ammonium process (DNRA) (Bacillus, Desulfovibrio and Pseudomonas, etc.) in Bioretention-2. In general, this study showed that biochar addition in soil coupled with mixing zero-valent iron and biochar as substrate layer was a more stable and efficient design through various aspects of evidence. It provides a new way for how to use zero-valent iron and biochar to improve nitrogen removal capacity in stormwater management.
本研究设计了三种生物滞留设施,以探究零价铁(ZVI)和生物炭对氮去除性能的影响,并寻求更合理的填料方式。结果表明,在降雨事件期间,生物滞留设施3的硝酸盐、铵和总氮的出水去除率分别为53.30±12.68%、98.41±0.38%和64.03±8.72%,而硝酸盐浓度随着干燥时间的增加而逐渐降低。根据批次试验,发现由于生物炭对溶解氧的截留作用,零价铁在生物滞留设施3和生物滞留设施1中能够持续稳定释放。此外,土壤层中的生物炭可以保护零价铁不被过度氧化,而基质层中的生物炭可以释放有机物以促进异养反硝化作用。微生物群落分析表明,优势菌门为变形菌门(20.92 - 40.81%)和放线菌门(9.89 - 24.54%)。优势硝化菌属为硝化螺菌属,同时土壤层中也存在好氧反硝化细菌(鞘氨醇单胞菌属、慢生根瘤菌属和金黄杆菌属等)。在基质层中,生物滞留设施1和生物滞留设施3中存在更多的亚铁介导的自养反硝化过程(硫杆菌属、地杆菌属和脱氮硫杆菌属等),而生物滞留设施2中异化硝酸盐还原为铵过程(DNRA)(芽孢杆菌属、脱硫弧菌属和假单胞菌属等)的比例更大。总体而言,本研究表明通过多方面证据,在土壤中添加生物炭并将零价铁与生物炭混合作为基质层是一种更稳定、高效的设计。它为如何利用零价铁和生物炭提高雨水管理中的氮去除能力提供了一种新方法。