Xing S Y, Qian K, Zhao Y X, Peng B, Yang J J, Dou L P, Liu D H
Medical School of Chinese PLA, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Department of Hematology in the Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2022 Sep 14;43(9):732-737. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2022.09.004.
To observe the effect of ruxolitinib combined with glucocorticoid on cytomegalovirus (CMV) activation in patients with acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) . The clinical data of 195 patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the Department of Hematology of the First Medical Center of the People's Liberation Army General Hospital from August 2018 to September 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the severity of aGVHD, the patients were divided into the non-GVHD group, aGVHD grade Ⅰ group, aGVHD grade Ⅱ-Ⅳ group, and aGVHD grade Ⅲ/Ⅳ group. In addition, they were classified into two subgroups according to the first-line treatment regimen for aGVHD: combined regimen group (ruxolitinib combined with glucocorticoid) and classical regimen group (glucocorticoid alone) . The cumulative incidence of CMV activation, the duration of CMV activation, and the duration of CMV negativity in each subgroup at 90 and 180 days after transplantation were analyzed. The overall survival and disease-free survival rates of patients in both regimens were compared. Sixty-four (32.8%) patients in the group did not develop aGVHD. The numbers of patients with grade Ⅰ, Ⅱ-Ⅳ, and Ⅲ/Ⅳ aGVHD were 30 (15.4%) , 101 (51.8%) , and 14 (7.2%) , respectively. Compared with patients in the classical regimen, no significant difference was observed in the cumulative incidence of CMV activation, duration of CMV activation, and duration of CMV negativity in patients with grade Ⅰ-Ⅳ aGVHD in the combined regimen at 90 and 180 days after transplantation (>0.05) . Further analysis of patients with grade Ⅱ-Ⅳ and Ⅲ/Ⅳ aGVHD showed that the cumulative incidence of CMV activation, duration of CMV activation, and duration of CMV negativity did not show significant difference between the two treatment regimens (>0.05) . In addition, there was no significant difference in the overall survival and disease-free survival rates of patients in both regimens (>0.05) . Ruxolitinib combined with glucocorticoid as the first-line therapy for aGVHD did not increase the risk of CMV activation.
观察芦可替尼联合糖皮质激素对急性移植物抗宿主病(aGVHD)患者巨细胞病毒(CMV)激活的影响。回顾性分析2018年8月至2020年9月在解放军总医院第一医学中心血液科接受异基因造血干细胞移植的195例患者的临床资料。根据aGVHD的严重程度,将患者分为非GVHD组、aGVHDⅠ级组、aGVHDⅡ - Ⅳ级组和aGVHDⅢ/Ⅳ级组。此外,根据aGVHD的一线治疗方案将其分为两个亚组:联合治疗组(芦可替尼联合糖皮质激素)和经典治疗组(仅糖皮质激素)。分析移植后90天和180天时各亚组CMV激活的累积发生率、CMV激活持续时间以及CMV阴性持续时间。比较两种治疗方案患者的总生存率和无病生存率。该组中有64例(32.8%)患者未发生aGVHD。aGVHDⅠ级、Ⅱ - Ⅳ级和Ⅲ/Ⅳ级的患者人数分别为30例(15.4%)、101例(51.8%)和14例(7.2%)。与经典治疗方案的患者相比,联合治疗方案中Ⅰ - Ⅳ级aGVHD患者在移植后90天和180天时CMV激活的累积发生率、CMV激活持续时间以及CMV阴性持续时间均无显著差异(>0.05)。对Ⅱ - Ⅳ级和Ⅲ/Ⅳ级aGVHD患者的进一步分析表明,两种治疗方案在CMV激活的累积发生率、CMV激活持续时间以及CMV阴性持续时间方面均无显著差异(>0.05)。此外,两种治疗方案患者的总生存率和无病生存率也无显著差异(>0.05)。芦可替尼联合糖皮质激素作为aGVHD的一线治疗方案不会增加CMV激活的风险。