Kiladjian Jean-Jacques, Zachee Pierre, Hino Masayuki, Pane Fabrizio, Masszi Tamas, Harrison Claire N, Mesa Ruben, Miller Carole B, Passamonti Francesco, Durrant Simon, Griesshammer Martin, Kirito Keita, Besses Carlos, Moiraghi Beatriz, Rumi Elisa, Rosti Vittorio, Blau Igor Wolfgang, Francillard Nathalie, Dong Tuochuan, Wroclawska Monika, Vannucchi Alessandro M, Verstovsek Srdan
Hôpital Saint-Louis, Assitance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Inserm, Paris, France.
Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen, Stuivenberg, Antwerp, Belgium.
Lancet Haematol. 2020 Mar;7(3):e226-e237. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30207-8. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
Polycythaemia vera is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterised by excessive proliferation of erythroid, myeloid, and megakaryocytic components in the bone marrow due to mutations in the Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) gene. Ruxolitinib, a JAK 1 and JAK 2 inhibitor, showed superiority over best available therapy in a phase 2 study in patients with polycythaemia vera who were resistant to or intolerant of hydroxyurea. We aimed to compare the long-term safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib with best available therapy in patients with polycythaemia vera who were resistant to or intolerant of hydroxyurea.
We report the 5-year results for a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study (RESPONSE) that enrolled patients at 109 sites across North America, South America, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific region. Patients (18 years or older) with polycythaemia vera who were resistant to or intolerant of hydroxyurea were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either ruxolitinib or best available therapy. Patients randomly assigned to the ruxolitinib group received the drug orally at a starting dose of 10 mg twice a day. Single-agent best available therapy comprised hydroxyurea, interferon or pegylated interferon, pipobroman, anagrelide, approved immunomodulators, or observation without pharmacological treatment. The primary endpoint, composite response (patients who achieved both haematocrit control without phlebotomy and 35% or more reduction from baseline in spleen volume) at 32 weeeks was previously reported. Patients receiving best available therapy could cross over to ruxolitinib after week 32. We assessed the durability of primary composite response, complete haematological remission, overall clinicohaematological response, overall survival, patient-reported outcomes, and safety after 5-years of follow-up. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01243944.
We enrolled patients between Oct 27, 2010, and Feb 13, 2013, and the study concluded on Feb 9, 2018. Of 342 individuals screened for eligibility, 222 patients were randomly assigned to receive ruxolitinib (n=110, 50%) or best available therapy (n=112, 50%). The median time since polycythaemia vera diagnosis was 8·2 years (IQR 3·9-12·3) in the ruxolitinib group and 9·3 years (4·9-13·8) in the best available therapy group. 98 (88%) of 112 patients initially randomly assigned to best available therapy crossed over to receive ruxolitinib and no patient remained on best available therapy after 80 weeks of study. Among 25 primary responders in the ruxolitinib group, six had progressed at the time of final analysis. At 5 years, the probability of maintaining primary composite response was 74% (95% CI 51-88). The probability of maintaining complete haematological remission was 55% (95% CI 32-73) and the probability of maintaining overall clinicohaematological responses was 67% (54-77). In the intention-to-treat analysis not accounting for crossover, the probability of survival at 5 years was 91·9% (84·4-95·9) with ruxolitinib therapy and 91·0% (82·8-95·4) with best available therapy. Anaemia was the most common adverse event in patients receiving ruxolitinib (rates per 100 patient-years of exposure were 8·9 for ruxolitinib and 8·8 for the crossover population), though most anaemia events were mild to moderate in severity (grade 1 or 2 anaemia rates per 100 patient-years of exposure were 8·0 for ruxolitinib and 8·2 for the crossover population). Non-haematological adverse events were generally lower with long-term ruxolitinib treatment than with best available therapy. Thromboembolic events were lower in the ruxolitinib group than the best available therapy group. There were two on-treatment deaths in the ruxolitinib group. One of these deaths was due to gastric adenocarcinoma, which was assessed by the investigator as related to ruxolitinib treatment.
We showed that ruxolitinib is a safe and effective long-term treatment option for patients with polycythaemia vera who are resistant to or intolerant of hydroxyurea. Taken together, ruxolitinib treatment offers the first widely approved therapeutic alternative for this post-hydroxyurea patient population.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.
真性红细胞增多症是一种骨髓增殖性肿瘤,其特征是由于Janus激酶2(JAK2)基因突变,骨髓中的红系、髓系和巨核细胞成分过度增殖。鲁索替尼是一种JAK1和JAK2抑制剂,在一项针对对羟基脲耐药或不耐受的真性红细胞增多症患者的2期研究中,显示出优于最佳可用疗法的效果。我们旨在比较鲁索替尼与最佳可用疗法在对羟基脲耐药或不耐受的真性红细胞增多症患者中的长期安全性和疗效。
我们报告了一项随机、开放标签、3期研究(RESPONSE)的5年结果,该研究在北美、南美、欧洲和亚太地区的109个地点招募患者。年龄在18岁及以上、对羟基脲耐药或不耐受的真性红细胞增多症患者被随机分配,1:1接受鲁索替尼或最佳可用疗法。随机分配到鲁索替尼组的患者口服该药物,起始剂量为每日两次,每次10mg。单药最佳可用疗法包括羟基脲、干扰素或聚乙二醇化干扰素、哌泊溴烷、阿那格雷、获批的免疫调节剂,或不进行药物治疗的观察。先前已报告32周时的主要终点,即复合缓解(无需放血即可实现血细胞比容控制且脾脏体积较基线减少35%或更多的患者)。接受最佳可用疗法的患者在第32周后可交叉接受鲁索替尼治疗。我们评估了5年随访后的主要复合缓解、完全血液学缓解、总体临床血液学缓解、总生存期、患者报告的结局以及安全性的持久性。本研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,注册号为NCT01243944。
我们在2010年10月27日至2013年2月13日期间招募患者,研究于2018年2月9日结束。在342名筛查合格的个体中,222名患者被随机分配接受鲁索替尼(n = 110,50%)或最佳可用疗法(n = 112,50%)。鲁索替尼组自真性红细胞增多症诊断后的中位时间为8.2年(IQR 3.9 - 12.3),最佳可用疗法组为9.3年(4.9 - 13.8)。最初随机分配接受最佳可用疗法的112名患者中有98名(88%)交叉接受鲁索替尼治疗,研究80周后没有患者继续接受最佳可用疗法。在鲁索替尼组的25名主要缓解者中,6名在最终分析时病情进展。5年时,维持主要复合缓解的概率为74%(95%CI 51 - 88)。维持完全血液学缓解的概率为55%(95%CI 32 - 73),维持总体临床血液学缓解的概率为67%(54 - 77)。在意向性分析(不考虑交叉情况)中,鲁索替尼治疗组5年生存率为91.9%(84.4 - 95.9),最佳可用疗法组为91.0%(82.8 - 95.4)。贫血是接受鲁索替尼治疗患者中最常见的不良事件(鲁索替尼每100患者年暴露率为8.9,交叉人群为8.8),不过大多数贫血事件为轻度至中度严重程度(鲁索替尼每100患者年暴露的1级或2级贫血率为8.0,交叉人群为8.2)。长期鲁索替尼治疗的非血液学不良事件总体低于最佳可用疗法。鲁索替尼组的血栓栓塞事件低于最佳可用疗法组。鲁索替尼组有2例治疗期间死亡。其中1例死亡归因于胃腺癌(研究者评估与鲁索替尼治疗有关)。
我们表明,鲁索替尼对于对羟基脲耐药或不耐受的真性红细胞增多症患者是一种安全有效的长期治疗选择。总体而言,鲁索替尼治疗为这一羟基脲治疗后的患者群体提供了首个广泛获批的治疗替代方案。
诺华制药公司。