Suppr超能文献

比较不同土壤采样不确定性确定方法。

Comparison of different approaches of soil sampling uncertainty determination.

机构信息

Jožef Stefan Institute, Jamova cesta 39, SI-1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Belgian Nuclear Research Centre, SCK CEN, Boeretang 200, 2400, Mol, Belgium.

出版信息

Appl Radiat Isot. 2023 Apr;194:110676. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2023.110676. Epub 2023 Jan 19.

Abstract

The ISO/IEC 17025 standard requires that all significant contributions have to be propagated to the measurement uncertainty, including also sampling uncertainties. We evaluated soil sampling uncertainties for gamma-ray spectrometry by using in-house and split-sample methods. By in-house method, the sampling uncertainty was determined by comparing standard deviations of measurement results and average analytical uncertainty. With split-sample method, it was calculated using between-sample and between-analysis variances. If analytical uncertainty is reliably determined, the in-house method is recommended because fewer measurements are needed.

摘要

ISO/IEC 17025 标准要求,所有重要贡献都必须传播到测量不确定度中,包括采样不确定度。我们使用内部和分样方法评估了伽马射线光谱法的土壤采样不确定度。通过内部方法,通过比较测量结果的标准偏差和平均分析不确定度来确定采样不确定度。使用分样方法,通过样品间和分析间方差来计算。如果可靠地确定了分析不确定度,则建议使用内部方法,因为需要的测量次数较少。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验