Estañ-Capell Javier, Alarcón-Torres Beatriz, Miró-Pedro Magdalena, Martínez-Costa Cecilia
Neonatal Unit, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valencia, Spain.
Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Am J Perinatol. 2024 May;41(S 01):e1212-e1219. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1761297. Epub 2023 Jan 29.
Consensus around the ideal chart to classify preterm babies is scant. It is particularly relevant in small for gestational age (SGA) infants due to its clinical and therapeutic implications. The aim of the study was to compare Olsen, Intergrowth-21st, and Fenton growth charts, regarding the classification at birth and incidence of SGA preterm infants.
Retrospective study of 529 preterm infants ≤ 32 weeks of gestational age. Birth weight -score was calculated applying the three growth charts and ponderal index (PI) was also estimated. Incidence of SGA (birth weight < 10th percentile) and clinical outcome were compared according to the chart used.
Incidence of SGA was significantly higher ( < 0.001) with Olsen (101 cases, 19.1%) compared with Intergrowth-21st (75 cases, 14.2%) and Fenton (53 cases, 10%). Differences were also found with PI of SGA preterm infants, as those infants classified by Olsen were mostly symmetric (PI > 10th percentile), while Fenton and Intergrowth-21st identified less symmetric SGA infants. Kappa concordance between Intergrowth-21st and Fenton was 0.805, Intergrowth-21st versus Olsen 0.824, and Fenton versus Olsen 0.641. No differences were observed on neonatal morbidities or mortality.
Significant differences were detected when classifying very preterm infants at birth according to the growth chart, mainly among symmetric SGA. Concordance between Fenton and Olsen was poor, but Intergrowth-21st showed high concordance with Fenton and Olsen. However, further research is needed to select the ideal chart. Variability in the population selected to create the curves and the accuracy dating the pregnancy are factors that may have explained differences.
· Very preterm infants are differently classified at birth with various growth charts.. · Higher incidence of small for gestational age infants with Olsen compared with Fenton or Intergrowth.. · Variability in population selection and accuracy in dating pregnancy may have explained differences..
关于用于对早产儿进行分类的理想图表,目前尚未形成共识。鉴于其临床和治疗意义,这一问题在小于胎龄(SGA)婴儿中尤为重要。本研究的目的是比较奥尔森(Olsen)、国际儿童生长标准(Intergrowth - 21st)和芬顿(Fenton)生长图表在SGA早产儿出生时的分类情况及发病率。
对529例孕周≤32周的早产儿进行回顾性研究。应用这三种生长图表计算出生体重评分,并估算体重指数(PI)。根据所使用的图表比较SGA(出生体重<第10百分位数)的发病率及临床结局。
与国际儿童生长标准(75例,14.2%)和芬顿(53例,10%)相比,奥尔森图表显示的SGA发病率显著更高(<0.001)(101例,19.1%)。在SGA早产儿的PI方面也发现了差异,因为那些用奥尔森图表分类的婴儿大多为匀称型(PI>第10百分位数),而芬顿和国际儿童生长标准识别出的匀称型SGA婴儿较少。国际儿童生长标准与芬顿之间的kappa一致性为0.805,国际儿童生长标准与奥尔森之间为0.824,芬顿与奥尔森之间为0.641。在新生儿发病率或死亡率方面未观察到差异。
根据生长图表对极早产儿进行出生时分类时发现了显著差异,主要存在于匀称型SGA婴儿中。芬顿和奥尔森之间的一致性较差,但国际儿童生长标准与芬顿和奥尔森之间显示出高度一致性。然而,需要进一步研究以选择理想的图表。用于创建曲线的所选人群的变异性以及妊娠日期确定的准确性可能是解释差异的因素。
· 极早产儿在出生时使用不同生长图表分类不同。· 与芬顿或国际儿童生长标准相比,奥尔森图表显示的小于胎龄婴儿发病率更高。· 人群选择的变异性和妊娠日期确定的准确性可能解释了差异。