Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, 4001 Discovery Dr., Boulder, CO 80303, United States.
Freestyle Partners, LLC, and its affiliate, FSP Innovations, LLC, MI, United States.
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Apr 15;869:161848. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161848. Epub 2023 Jan 26.
The COVID-19 pandemic has promoted interest in using devices emitting ultraviolet-C (UVC) irradiation (200-280 nm) for surface disinfection to reduce pathogen transmission, especially in occupied public spaces. While UVC devices have been shown to be highly effective against various pathogens, there are safety concerns when using conventional UVC devices for surface disinfection, including human exposure of reflected UVC irradiation and ozone generation. Emerging Far UVC devices (emitting at 200-230 nm), like the krypton chloride (KrCl*) excimer, have the potential to be safely applied in occupied spaces due to their minimal adverse effects on skin and eyes. In this study, UV reflection of 21 common materials was documented and compared using a filtered KrCl* excimer (installed with a bandpass filter at 222 nm), an unfiltered KrCl* excimer, and a conventional low-pressure mercury vapor lamp. The safety of Far UVC devices was evaluated based on the irradiance and spectrum of reflected UV irradiation and ozone generation measured at various locations around the device. Our results show that most common materials can reflect UV irradiation, among which some metals tend to have greater reflection. The Far UVC devices, especially the filtered KrCl* excimer, should be safe to be applied in occupied spaces for effective surface disinfection, with limited ozone generation and no health risk from reflected UV irradiation. However more caution is needed when using unfiltered KrCl* devices and conventional UV 254 nm light. This study provides urgently needed data on UV reflection of common materials and guidance for safety assessments of UVC devices for surface disinfection in occupied spaces.
COVID-19 大流行促使人们关注使用发射 200-280nm 紫外线-C(UVC)辐射的设备进行表面消毒,以减少病原体传播,尤其是在有人占用的公共空间。虽然 UVC 设备已被证明对各种病原体非常有效,但在使用传统 UVC 设备进行表面消毒时存在安全问题,包括人体暴露于反射的 UVC 辐射和臭氧产生。新兴的远紫外线-C(发射 200-230nm)设备,如氪氯(KrCl*)准分子,由于对皮肤和眼睛的副作用最小,有可能安全地应用于有人占用的空间。在这项研究中,使用带通滤光片(222nm)安装的过滤 KrCl准分子、未过滤的 KrCl准分子和传统的低压汞蒸气灯记录并比较了 21 种常见材料的紫外线反射情况。根据在设备周围各个位置测量的反射紫外线辐射和臭氧产生的辐照度和光谱评估了远紫外线-C 设备的安全性。我们的结果表明,大多数常见材料都可以反射紫外线辐射,其中一些金属的反射率较高。远紫外线-C 设备,特别是过滤 KrCl准分子,在有人占用的空间中用于有效表面消毒是安全的,臭氧产生有限,反射紫外线辐射不会带来健康风险。但是,在使用未过滤的 KrCl设备和传统的紫外线 254nm 光时需要更加小心。这项研究提供了关于常见材料紫外线反射的急需数据,并为有人占用空间中表面消毒用 UVC 设备的安全评估提供了指导。