• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[铒激光联合引导骨再生治疗骨缺损型种植体周围炎的效果评估]

[Evaluation of the effect of Er:YAG laser combined with guided bone regeneration in the treatment of peri-implantitis with osseous defects].

作者信息

Tu Hui-Juan, Li Ling-Yu, Li Yi-Dan, Luo Zhen-Lan, Yu Ming

机构信息

Department of General Dentistry, Dental Diseases Prevention and Treatment Center of Jiading District. Shanghai 201800, China. E-mail:

出版信息

Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2022 Aug;31(4):418-422.

PMID:36710558
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical benefits of Er:YAG laser combined with guided bone regeneration (GBR) in the treatment of peri-implantitis-assocaited osseous defects.

METHODS

Twenty-six patients (34 implants in total) who underwent implant restoration in Dental Disease Prevention and Treatment Institute, Jiading District, from 2017 to 2019 and were diagnosed with peri-implantitis with osseous defects, and randomly divided into the experimental group and control group. The two groups of patients received open flap surgery, debridement and GBR treatment. The only difference in the experimental group was the use of Er: YAG laser to modulate and remove inflammatory tissue as well as to decontaminate the implant surface, instead of traditional mechanical treatment in the control group. The probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing (BOP), and plaque index (PI), the height of the bone defect around the implant (reduce of marginal bone level, RBL) were recorded and compared. SPSS 20.0 software package was used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

The PD, BOP, PI and RBL of the two groups of patients were significantly improved after treatment with different methods. There was no significant difference in the improvement of PD, BOP and PI between the two groups 6, 12 and 24 months after treatment, while the improvement of RBL in the experimental group was significantly better than that of the control group 12 and 24 months after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In the treatment of GBR with peri-implantitis and osseous defects, Er: YAG laser therapy is more effective than traditional mechanical methods, and is more conducive to the regeneration of new bone.

摘要

目的

评估铒激光联合引导骨组织再生(GBR)治疗种植体周围炎相关骨缺损的临床疗效。

方法

选取2017年至2019年在嘉定区牙病防治所接受种植修复且被诊断为种植体周围炎伴骨缺损的26例患者(共34颗种植体),随机分为实验组和对照组。两组患者均接受翻瓣手术、清创及GBR治疗。实验组与对照组唯一的不同在于,实验组使用铒激光调节并去除炎性组织以及对种植体表面进行去污处理,而对照组采用传统机械治疗。记录并比较两组患者的探诊深度(PD)、探诊出血(BOP)、菌斑指数(PI)以及种植体周围骨缺损高度(边缘骨水平降低量,RBL)。采用SPSS 20.0软件包进行数据分析。

结果

两组患者经不同方法治疗后,PD、BOP、PI及RBL均有显著改善。治疗后6、12及24个月,两组患者PD、BOP及PI的改善情况无显著差异,而治疗后12及24个月,实验组RBL的改善情况显著优于对照组。

结论

在治疗种植体周围炎伴骨缺损的GBR中,铒激光治疗比传统机械方法更有效,且更有利于新骨再生。

相似文献

1
[Evaluation of the effect of Er:YAG laser combined with guided bone regeneration in the treatment of peri-implantitis with osseous defects].[铒激光联合引导骨再生治疗骨缺损型种植体周围炎的效果评估]
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2022 Aug;31(4):418-422.
2
Laser-assisted regenerative surgical therapy for peri-implantitis: A randomized controlled clinical trial.激光辅助种植体周围炎再生手术治疗:一项随机对照临床试验。
J Periodontol. 2021 Mar;92(3):378-388. doi: 10.1002/JPER.20-0040. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
3
The clinical efficacy of Er:YAG lasers in the treatment of peri-implantitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Er:YAG 激光治疗种植体周围炎的临床疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Aug;10(8):9002-9014. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-1853.
4
Effect of Nd:YAG laser-assisted non-surgical mechanical debridement on clinical and radiographic peri-implant inflammatory parameters in patients with peri-implant disease.钕钇铝石榴石激光辅助非手术机械清创对种植体周围疾病患者临床及影像学种植体周围炎症参数的影响。
J Photochem Photobiol B. 2017 Mar;168:16-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2017.01.015. Epub 2017 Jan 21.
5
Er:YAG laser in the clinical management of severe peri-implantitis: a case report.铒激光在重度种植体周炎临床治疗中的应用:一例报告
J Oral Implantol. 2011 Mar;37 Spec No:212-7. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-09-00145.1. Epub 2010 Jun 16.
6
Evaluation of the effect of Er,Cr:YSGG laser application on peri-implant crevicular fluid receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand and osteoprotegerin levels in the non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis: A randomized clinical trial.评价 Er,Cr:YSGG 激光应用于种植体周围炎非手术治疗中对种植体周围液核因子-κB 配体受体激活剂和骨保护素水平的影响:一项随机临床试验。
J Periodontol. 2024 Oct;95(10):917-928. doi: 10.1002/JPER.23-0540. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
7
Efficacy of Er:YAG Laser as a Debridement Method in Surgical Treatment for Peri-Implantitis: A Systematic Review.铒激光作为种植体周围炎外科治疗中清创方法的疗效:一项系统评价。
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2023 Jan 18;21:17-24. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.b3818041.
8
Laser-Assisted Therapy for the Treatment of Peri-implantitis. Part I. Clinical Outcomes.激光辅助治疗种植体周围炎。第一部分。临床疗效。
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2021 Jul-Aug;41(4):563-568. doi: 10.11607/prd.5377.
9
Laser therapy for treatment of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis: An American Academy of Periodontology best evidence review.激光治疗用于治疗种植体周围黏膜炎和种植体周围炎:美国牙周病学会的最佳证据综述。
J Periodontol. 2018 Jul;89(7):766-782. doi: 10.1902/jop.2017.160483.
10
Efficacy of Er:YAG laser for the peri-implantitis treatment and microbiological changes: a randomized controlled trial.Er:YAG 激光治疗种植体周围炎及微生物变化的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
Lasers Med Sci. 2022 Dec;37(9):3517-3525. doi: 10.1007/s10103-022-03627-8. Epub 2022 Aug 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancing Peri-Implantitis Treatment: A Scoping Review of Breakthroughs in Implantoplasty and Er:YAG Laser Therapies.推进种植体周围炎治疗:种植体成形术和铒钇铝石榴石激光疗法突破的范围综述
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025 Feb;11(1):e70104. doi: 10.1002/cre2.70104.