Dolhopiatenko Hanna, Nogueira Waldo
Department of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School and Cluster of Excellence Hearing4all, Hanover, Germany.
Front Neurosci. 2023 Jan 11;16:1057605. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1057605. eCollection 2022.
The growing group of cochlear implant (CI) users includes subjects with preserved acoustic hearing on the opposite side to the CI. The use of both listening sides results in improved speech perception in comparison to listening with one side alone. However, large variability in the measured benefit is observed. It is possible that this variability is associated with the integration of speech across electric and acoustic stimulation modalities. However, there is a lack of established methods to assess speech integration between electric and acoustic stimulation and consequently to adequately program the devices. Moreover, existing methods do not provide information about the underlying physiological mechanisms of this integration or are based on simple stimuli that are difficult to relate to speech integration. Electroencephalography (EEG) to continuous speech is promising as an objective measure of speech perception, however, its application in CIs is challenging because it is influenced by the electrical artifact introduced by these devices. For this reason, the main goal of this work is to investigate a possible electrophysiological measure of speech integration between electric and acoustic stimulation in bimodal CI users. For this purpose, a selective attention decoding paradigm has been designed and validated in bimodal CI users. The current study included behavioral and electrophysiological measures. The behavioral measure consisted of a speech understanding test, where subjects repeated words to a target speaker in the presence of a competing voice listening with the CI side (CIS) only, with the acoustic side (AS) only or with both listening sides (CIS+AS). Electrophysiological measures included cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) and selective attention decoding through EEG. CAEPs were recorded to broadband stimuli to confirm the feasibility to record cortical responses with CIS only, AS only, and CIS+AS listening modes. In the selective attention decoding paradigm a co-located target and a competing speech stream were presented to the subjects using the three listening modes (CIS only, AS only, and CIS+AS). The main hypothesis of the current study is that selective attention can be decoded in CI users despite the presence of CI electrical artifact. If selective attention decoding improves combining electric and acoustic stimulation with respect to electric stimulation alone, the hypothesis can be confirmed. No significant difference in behavioral speech understanding performance when listening with CIS+AS and AS only was found, mainly due to the ceiling effect observed with these two listening modes. The main finding of the current study is the possibility to decode selective attention in CI users even if continuous artifact is present. Moreover, an amplitude reduction of the forward transfer response function (TRF) of selective attention decoding was observed when listening with CIS+AS compared to AS only. Further studies to validate selective attention decoding as an electrophysiological measure of electric acoustic speech integration are required.
人工耳蜗(CI)使用者群体不断扩大,其中包括在CI对侧仍保留听觉的受试者。与仅使用一侧听力相比,双侧听力的使用可提高言语感知能力。然而,观察到测量的益处存在很大差异。这种差异可能与电刺激和声学刺激两种模式下言语的整合有关。然而,目前缺乏评估电刺激和声学刺激之间言语整合的既定方法,因此无法对设备进行充分编程。此外,现有方法无法提供有关这种整合潜在生理机制的信息,或者基于难以与言语整合相关联的简单刺激。脑电图(EEG)用于连续言语有望成为言语感知的客观测量方法,然而,其在CI中的应用具有挑战性,因为它会受到这些设备引入的电伪迹的影响。因此,这项工作的主要目标是研究一种可能的电生理测量方法,用于评估双侧CI使用者电刺激和声学刺激之间的言语整合。为此,设计并验证了一种选择性注意解码范式用于双侧CI使用者。当前的研究包括行为学和电生理学测量。行为学测量包括一项言语理解测试,受试者在存在竞争语音的情况下,仅使用CI侧(CIS)、仅使用声学侧(AS)或同时使用双侧(CIS + AS)聆听,然后向目标说话者重复单词。电生理学测量包括皮层听觉诱发电位(CAEP)和通过EEG进行的选择性注意解码。记录CAEP对宽带刺激的反应,以确认仅使用CIS、仅使用AS以及CIS + AS聆听模式记录皮层反应的可行性。在选择性注意解码范式中,使用三种聆听模式(仅CIS、仅AS和CIS + AS)向受试者呈现共定位的目标语音流和竞争语音流。当前研究的主要假设是,尽管存在CI电伪迹,CI使用者仍可进行选择性注意解码。如果与仅电刺激相比,电刺激和声学刺激相结合时选择性注意解码得到改善,则该假设可得到证实。未发现使用CIS + AS和仅使用AS聆听时行为言语理解表现有显著差异,主要是由于在这两种聆听模式下观察到了天花板效应。当前研究的主要发现是,即使存在连续伪迹,CI使用者仍有可能解码选择性注意。此外,与仅使用AS聆听相比,使用CIS + AS聆听时观察到选择性注意解码的前向传递响应函数(TRF)幅度降低。需要进一步研究以验证选择性注意解码作为电声言语整合电生理测量方法的有效性。