Abou Kamar Sabrina, Aga Yaar S, de Bakker Marie, van den Berg Victor J, Strachinaru Mihai, Bowen Dan, Frowijn René, Akkerhuis K Martijn, Brugts Jasper, Manintveld Olivier, Umans Victor, Geleijnse Marcel L, Boersma Eric, van Dalen Bas M, Kardys Isabella
Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Netherlands Heart Institute, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jan 12;9:1087596. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1087596. eCollection 2022.
We investigated whether repeatedly measured global longitudinal strain (GLS) has incremental prognostic value over repeatedly measured left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and a single "baseline" GLS value, in chronic heart failure (HF) patients.
In this prospective observational study, echocardiography was performed in 173 clinically stable chronic HF patients every six months during follow up. During a median follow-up of 2.7 years, a median of 3 (25th-75th percentile:2-4) echocardiograms were obtained per patient. The endpoint was a composite of HF hospitalization, left ventricular assist device, heart transplantation, cardiovascular death. We compared hazard ratios (HRs) for the endpoint from Cox models (used to analyze the first available GLS measurements) with HRs from joint models (which links repeated measurements to the time-to-event data).
Mean age was 58 ± 11 years, 76% were men, 81% were in New York Heart Association functional class I/II, and all had LVEF < 50% (mean ± SD: 27 ± 9%). The endpoint was reached by 53 patients. GLS was persistently decreased over time in patients with the endpoint. However, temporal GLS trajectories did not further diverge in patients with versus without the endpoint and remained stable during follow-up. Both single measurements and temporal trajectories of GLS were significantly associated with the endpoint [HR per SD change (95%CI): 2.15(1.34-3.46), 3.54 (2.01-6.20)]. In a multivariable model, repeatedly measured GLS maintained its prognostic value while repeatedly measured LVEF did not [HR per SD change (95%CI): GLS:4.38 (1.49-14.70), LVEF:1.14 (0.41-3.23)]. The association disappeared when correcting for repeatedly measured NT-proBNP.
Temporal evolution of GLS was associated with adverse events, independent of LVEF but not independent of NT-proBNP. Since GLS showed decreased but stable values in patients with adverse prognosis, single measurements of GLS provide sufficient information for determining prognosis in clinical practice compared to repeated measurements, and temporal GLS patterns do not add prognostic information to NT-proBNP.
我们研究了在慢性心力衰竭(HF)患者中,重复测量的整体纵向应变(GLS)相对于重复测量的左心室射血分数(LVEF)、N末端B型利钠肽原(NT-proBNP)以及单个“基线”GLS值是否具有额外的预后价值。
在这项前瞻性观察性研究中,对173例临床稳定的慢性HF患者在随访期间每6个月进行一次超声心动图检查。在中位随访2.7年期间,每位患者获得的超声心动图中位数为3次(第25 - 75百分位数:2 - 4次)。终点为HF住院、左心室辅助装置植入、心脏移植、心血管死亡的复合终点。我们将Cox模型(用于分析首次获得的GLS测量值)得出的终点风险比(HRs)与联合模型(将重复测量与事件发生时间数据相联系)得出的HRs进行比较。
平均年龄为58±11岁,76%为男性,81%处于纽约心脏协会功能分级I/II级,且所有患者的LVEF均<50%(均值±标准差:27±9%)。53例患者达到终点。终点患者的GLS随时间持续下降。然而,有终点和无终点患者的GLS时间轨迹并未进一步分化,且在随访期间保持稳定。GLS的单次测量值和时间轨迹均与终点显著相关[每标准差变化的HR(95%置信区间):2.15(1.34 -