Nimkarn Norrarath, Sewarit Anyamanee, Pirojsakul Kwanchai, Paksi Witchuri, Chantarogh Songkiat, Saisawat Pawaree, Tangnararatchakit Kanchana
Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jan 11;9:1026606. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1026606. eCollection 2022.
Waist-to-height-ratio (WHtR) has been proposed as another indicator for cardiometabolic risk factors including hypertension. Normally, hypertension can be diagnosed in the office setting by detecting high blood pressure for three occasions. However, patients with high office blood pressure may not exhibit high blood pressure outside the office. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is a procedure to measure blood pressure over 24-h. Sustained hypertension is characterized as hypertension detected by both office measurement and ABPM. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of WHtR in the diagnosis of sustained hypertension in patients with high office blood pressure.
Demographic data, height, body weight, body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference were retrospectively reviewed in children and adolescents who underwent ABPM due to persistently high office blood pressure. Patients were separated into two groups: a sustained hypertension group and a normal ABPM group. BMI was adjusted to z-score using the WHO Anthroplus software. WHtR was calculated by the formula: waist circumference (cm)/height (m). The performances of different parameters were analyzed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and multivariate logistic regression.
Sixty patients (63% male) with a mean age of 12.9 ± 3.7 years had persistently high office blood pressure. Twenty-nine (48.3%) had high ambulatory blood pressure parameters so-called "sustained hypertension." The sustained hypertension group had a higher mean BMI z-score (2.32 vs. 1.31, = 0.01) and a higher mean WHtR (57.7 vs. 49.2 cm/m, < 0.001) than those of the normal ABPM group. For the diagnosis of sustained hypertension, the ROC analysis revealed that WHtR had a greater area under the ROC curve (AUC) than that of BMI z-score (0.772 vs. 0.723). WHtR remained associated with sustained hypertension (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.022-1.408, = 0.026) after adjusting for age, gender, and BMI z-score.
Apart from being a more user-friendly metric, WHtR tended to outperform BMI z-score in predicting sustained hypertension in children and adolescents with persistently high office blood pressure.
腰高比(WHtR)已被提议作为包括高血压在内的心血管代谢危险因素的另一指标。通常,在诊室环境中通过三次检测到高血压即可诊断高血压。然而,诊室血压高的患者在诊室以外可能并未表现出高血压。动态血压监测(ABPM)是一种测量24小时血压的方法。持续性高血压的特征是通过诊室测量和ABPM均检测到高血压。本研究旨在评估WHtR在诊断诊室血压高的患者持续性高血压中的性能。
对因诊室血压持续升高而接受ABPM的儿童和青少年的人口统计学数据、身高、体重、体重指数(BMI)和腰围进行回顾性分析。患者被分为两组:持续性高血压组和正常ABPM组。使用WHO Anthroplus软件将BMI调整为z评分。WHtR通过以下公式计算:腰围(厘米)/身高(米)。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线和多因素逻辑回归分析不同参数的性能。
60例患者(63%为男性),平均年龄12.9±3.7岁,诊室血压持续升高。29例(48.3%)动态血压参数高,即所谓的“持续性高血压”。与正常ABPM组相比,持续性高血压组的平均BMI z评分更高(2.32比1.31,P = 0.01),平均WHtR更高(57.7比49.2厘米/米,P < 0.001)。对于持续性高血压的诊断,ROC分析显示,WHtR的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)大于BMI z评分(0.772比0.723)。在调整年龄、性别和BMI z评分后,WHtR仍与持续性高血压相关(OR 1.2,95%CI 1.022 - 1.408,P = 0.026)。
除了是一个更便于使用的指标外,在预测诊室血压持续升高的儿童和青少年的持续性高血压方面,WHtR往往优于BMI z评分。