Becquet Philippe, Vazquez-Anon Mercedes, Mercier Yves, Batonon-Alavo Dolores I, Yan Frances, Wedekind Karen, Mahmood Tahir
IMAA, Brussels, Belgium.
Novus International, Saint Charles, Missouri, USA.
Anim Nutr. 2022 Sep 27;12:159-170. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2022.09.004. eCollection 2023 Mar.
This literature review evaluates the absorption of methionine (Met) sources such as 2-hydroxy-4-methylthiobutyric acid (HMTBa), its calcium salts (HMTBa-Ca), and DL-methionine (DL-Met) by focusing on the state of knowledge regarding the absorption mechanism, experimental methodology, and factors affecting their absorption. The 2 Met sources differ in mechanism and site of absorption due to differences in their chemical characteristics and enzymatic conversion. This review addresses diffusion- and transport-mediated absorption systems for amino acids and carboxylic compounds, best elucidated by in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo experimental models. Opportunities and limitations in the use of radioisotopes to depict absorption sites as well as host and microbial metabolism are described. Physiological and environmental conditions that lead to changes in gut absorptive capacity and the impact of Met source absorption are also evaluated. This review concludes that any comparison between HMTBa and DL-Met should consider their different behaviors during the absorption phase. Hence, the chemical characteristics of these 2 molecules entail different absorption sites and mechanisms, from passive absorption in the case of HMTBa and HMTBa-Ca to active transporters for DL-Met, HMTBa, and HMTBa-Ca. In addition, the different conversion modes of these 2 molecules further differentiate their absorption modes. Considering these important differences, it is easier to understand the apparent divergence between the conclusions of existing publications. When comparing these 2 molecules, it is recommended to properly adapt to the conditions under which the absorption of Met sources is evaluated.
本综述通过关注蛋氨酸(Met)吸收机制、实验方法及影响其吸收的因素等方面的现有知识,评估了2-羟基-4-甲硫基丁酸(HMTBa)及其钙盐(HMTBa-Ca)和DL-蛋氨酸(DL-Met)等蛋氨酸来源的吸收情况。由于化学特性和酶促转化的差异,这两种蛋氨酸来源在吸收机制和部位上有所不同。本综述探讨了氨基酸和羧酸化合物的扩散介导和转运介导的吸收系统,体外、离体和体内实验模型能最好地阐明这些系统。描述了使用放射性同位素描绘吸收部位以及宿主和微生物代谢方面的机遇和局限性。还评估了导致肠道吸收能力变化的生理和环境条件以及蛋氨酸来源吸收的影响。本综述得出结论,HMTBa和DL-Met之间的任何比较都应考虑它们在吸收阶段的不同行为。因此,这两种分子的化学特性导致不同的吸收部位和机制,HMTBa和HMTBa-Ca为被动吸收,而DL-Met、HMTBa和HMTBa-Ca则通过主动转运蛋白吸收。此外,这两种分子不同的转化模式进一步区分了它们的吸收模式。考虑到这些重要差异,更容易理解现有出版物结论之间明显的分歧。比较这两种分子时,建议适当适应评估蛋氨酸来源吸收的条件。