Cerda-Cosme Roxana, Méndez Eva
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid Madrid Spain.
Library and Information Science Department Universidad Carlos III de Madrid Madrid Spain.
J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2022 Oct 20. doi: 10.1002/asi.24716.
During the coronavirus pandemic, changes in the way science is done and shared occurred, which motivates meta-research to help understand science communication in crises and improve its effectiveness. The objective is to study how many Spanish scientific papers on COVID-19 published during 2020 share their research data. Qualitative and descriptive study applying nine attributes: (a) availability, (b) accessibility, (c) format, (d) licensing, (e) linkage, (f) funding, (g) editorial policy, (h) content, and (i) statistics. We analyzed 1,340 papers, 1,173 (87.5%) did not have research data. A total of 12.5% share their research data of which 2.1% share their data in repositories, 5% share their data through a simple request, 0.2% do not have permission to share their data, and 5.2% share their data as supplementary material. There is a small percentage that shares their research data; however, it demonstrates the researchers' poor knowledge on how to properly share their research data and their lack of knowledge on what is research data.
在新冠疫情期间,科学研究的开展和分享方式发生了变化,这促使元研究来帮助理解危机中的科学传播并提高其有效性。目的是研究2020年发表的关于新冠病毒的西班牙科学论文中有多少分享了其研究数据。采用九个属性进行定性和描述性研究:(a)可用性,(b)可获取性,(c)格式,(d)许可,(e)链接,(f)资金,(g)编辑政策,(h)内容,以及(i)统计数据。我们分析了1340篇论文,其中1173篇(87.5%)没有研究数据。共有12.5%的论文分享了其研究数据,其中2.1%在知识库中分享数据,5%通过简单请求分享数据,0.2%没有分享数据的许可,5.2%将数据作为补充材料分享。分享研究数据的比例较小;然而,这表明研究人员在如何正确分享研究数据方面知识匮乏,且对什么是研究数据缺乏了解。