Suppr超能文献

影响医疗保健和社会保健之间老年人护理方面有效数据共享的因素:定性证据综合分析。

Factors influencing effective data sharing between health care and social care regarding the care of older people: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

机构信息

Exeter HS&DR Evidence Synthesis Centre, Department of Health and Community Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

出版信息

Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 May;12(12):1-87. doi: 10.3310/TTWG4738.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sharing data about patients between health and social care organisations and professionals, such as details of their medication, is essential to provide co-ordinated and person-centred care. While professionals can share data in a number of ways - for example, through shared electronic record systems or multidisciplinary team meetings - there are many factors that make sharing data across the health and social care boundary difficult. These include professional hierarchies, inaccessible electronic systems and concerns around confidentiality. Data-sharing is particularly important for the care of older people, as they are more likely to have multiple or long-term conditions; understanding is needed on how to enable effective data-sharing.

OBJECTIVES

To identify factors perceived as influencing effective data-sharing, including the successful adoption of interventions to improve data-sharing, between healthcare and social care organisations and professionals regarding the care of older people.

METHODS

MEDLINE and seven further databases were searched (in March 2023) for qualitative and mixed-methods studies. Relevant websites were searched and citation-chasing completed on included studies. Studies were included if they focused on older people, as defined by the study, and data-sharing, defined as the transfer of information between healthcare and social care organisations, or care professionals, regarding a patient, and were conducted in the United Kingdom. Purposive sampling was used to obtain a final set of studies which were analysed using framework synthesis. Quality appraisal was conducted using the Wallace checklist. Stakeholder and public and patient involvement groups were consulted throughout the project.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies were included; most scored highly on the quality appraisal checklist. Four main themes were identified. Within , we found five purposes of data-sharing: joint (health and social care) assessment, integrated case management, transitions from hospital to home, for residents of care homes, and for palliative care. In , building interprofessional relationships, and therefore trust and respect, between professionals supported data-sharing, while the presence of professional prejudices and mistrust hindered it. Interorganisational , such as a shared vision of care and operationalisation of formal agreements, for example data governance, supported data-sharing. Within , the use of technology as a tool supported data-sharing, as did professionals' awareness of the wider care system. There were also specific factors influencing data-sharing related to its purpose; for example, there was a lack of legal frameworks in the area of palliative care.

LIMITATIONS

Data-sharing was usually discussed in the context of wider initiatives, for example integrated care, which meant the information provided was often limited. The COVID-19 pandemic has had significant impacts on ways of working; none of our included studies were conducted during or since the pandemic.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate the importance of building interprofessional relationships and ensuring that professionals are able to share data in multiple ways.

FUTURE WORK

Exploration of the impact of new technologies and ways of working adopted as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic on data-sharing is needed. Additionally, research should explore patient experience and the prevention of digital exclusion among health and social care professionals.

STUDY REGISTRATION

The protocol was registered on PROSPERO CRD42023416621.

FUNDING

This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR135660), as part of a series of evidence syntheses under award NIHR130538, and is published in full in ; Vol. 12, No. 12. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

摘要

背景

在卫生和社会保健组织以及专业人员之间共享有关患者的数据,例如他们的用药细节,对于提供协调和以患者为中心的护理至关重要。虽然专业人员可以通过多种方式共享数据,例如通过共享电子记录系统或多学科团队会议,但有许多因素使得在卫生和社会保健边界内共享数据变得困难。这些因素包括专业等级制度、难以访问的电子系统以及对保密性的担忧。数据共享对于老年人的护理尤为重要,因为他们更有可能患有多种或长期疾病;需要了解如何实现有效的数据共享。

目的

确定在医疗保健和社会保健组织以及专业人员之间,影响有效数据共享的因素,包括成功采用改善数据共享的干预措施,以改善老年人的护理。

方法

2023 年 3 月,对 MEDLINE 和另外七个数据库进行了搜索,以获取有关定性和混合方法研究的信息。搜索了相关网站,并对纳入的研究进行了引文追踪。如果研究的重点是老年人(由研究定义)和数据共享(定义为医疗保健和社会保健组织之间或护理专业人员之间关于患者的信息转移),并且在英国进行,则将其纳入研究。使用目的抽样获得最终的研究集,并使用框架综合法对其进行分析。使用 Wallace 清单进行质量评估。在整个项目中咨询了利益相关者、公众和患者参与团体。

结果

纳入了 24 项研究;大多数在质量评估清单上的得分都很高。确定了四个主要主题。在 内,我们发现了数据共享的五个目的:联合(卫生和社会保健)评估、综合病例管理、从医院到家庭的过渡、养老院居民和姑息治疗。在 内,专业人员之间建立信任和尊重的关系有助于数据共享,而专业偏见和不信任则阻碍了数据共享。组织间 ,例如对护理的共同愿景和正式协议的运作(例如数据治理),支持数据共享。在 内,将技术作为工具使用支持数据共享,专业人员对更广泛的护理系统的认识也是如此。还有一些特定因素会影响数据共享,具体取决于其目的;例如,姑息治疗领域缺乏法律框架。

局限性

数据共享通常是在更广泛的举措(例如综合护理)的背景下讨论的,因此提供的信息通常是有限的。COVID-19 大流行对工作方式产生了重大影响;我们纳入的研究中没有一项是在大流行期间或之后进行的。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,建立专业人员之间的关系以及确保专业人员能够以多种方式共享数据非常重要。

未来工作

需要探索由于 COVID-19 大流行而采用的新技术和工作方式对数据共享的影响。此外,研究应探讨患者体验以及预防卫生和社会保健专业人员的数字排斥。

研究注册

该方案在 PROSPERO CRD42023416621 上进行了注册。

资金

该奖项由英国国家卫生与保健研究所(NIHR)健康与社会保健交付研究计划(NIHR 奖 REF:NIHR135660)资助,作为一系列证据综合研究的一部分,由 NIHR130538 资助,并在全文中发表;第 12 卷,第 12 期。请访问 NIHR 资助和奖项网站,以获取更多奖项信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验