• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同粉末临床喷砂处理对金属烤瓷冠核表面粗糙度及其添加修复材料后抗折强度的影响:一项体外研究

The Effect of Clinical Sandblasting With Different Powders on the Surface Roughness of Cores for Metal-Ceramic Crowns and Their Fracture Resistance After the Addition of Repair Material: An In-Vitro Study.

作者信息

Yassin Mohammed, Salih Shatha

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Hawler Medical University, College of Dentistry, Erbil, IRQ.

出版信息

Cureus. 2022 Dec 27;14(12):e33012. doi: 10.7759/cureus.33012. eCollection 2022 Dec.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.33012
PMID:36712729
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9879587/
Abstract

Background One of the most frequently encountered issues with metal-ceramic restorations is the fracture of veneering porcelain. This in-vitro study aims to evaluate the effect of clinical sandblasting with 50 μm aluminum oxide and 30 μm silica-coated particles on the surface roughness of metal cores and the subsequent effect on their fracture resistance after the addition of specific adhesive and packable composite as a repair material. Methodology Metal cores (n = 21) were digitally designed and three-dimensionally printed by selective laser melting (SLM) technique. These cores were randomly divided into three groups. Group A (n = 8) was sandblasted with 50 μm aluminum oxide and veneered with light cure composite. Group B (n = 8) was sandblasted with 30 μm silica-coated particles and veneered with light cure composite. Group C control group (n = 5) was sandblasted in the laboratory with 250 μm aluminum oxide and veneered with porcelain. All specimens were tested for surface roughness by a stylus profilometer. After adding the veneering material, all specimens were subjected to a fracture resistance test through a universal testing machine. Results One-way analysis of variance test showed a significantly higher difference for the specimens sandblasted in the laboratory using 250 μm aluminum oxide. Fracture resistance values showed no significant difference between groups A and B. Conclusions Groups A and B showed no significant difference in surface roughness, but their fracture resistance values were above the acceptable clinical limit. Despite the rough nature of metal cores fabricated by the SLM technique, sandblasting with silica-coated particles may be an effective way to optimize the fracture resistance of the repair material because it provides the basis for chemical adhesion.

摘要

背景 金属陶瓷修复体最常遇到的问题之一是饰面瓷的断裂。本体外研究旨在评估用50μm氧化铝和30μm二氧化硅包覆颗粒进行临床喷砂处理对金属核表面粗糙度的影响,以及在添加特定粘合剂和可压实复合材料作为修复材料后对其抗折强度的后续影响。方法 金属核(n = 21)通过选择性激光熔化(SLM)技术进行数字化设计和三维打印。这些核被随机分为三组。A组(n = 8)用50μm氧化铝喷砂处理,并用光固化复合材料饰面。B组(n = 8)用30μm二氧化硅包覆颗粒喷砂处理,并用光固化复合材料饰面。C组对照组(n = 5)在实验室用250μm氧化铝喷砂处理,并用瓷饰面。所有标本均通过触针式轮廓仪测试表面粗糙度。添加饰面材料后,所有标本通过万能试验机进行抗折强度测试。结果 单因素方差分析测试显示,在实验室使用250μm氧化铝喷砂处理的标本存在显著更高的差异。A组和B组的抗折强度值无显著差异。结论 A组和B组在表面粗糙度上无显著差异,但其抗折强度值高于可接受的临床极限。尽管通过SLM技术制造的金属核表面粗糙,但用二氧化硅包覆颗粒喷砂处理可能是优化修复材料抗折强度的有效方法,因为它为化学粘附提供了基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc18/9879587/94f49c119031/cureus-0014-00000033012-i12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc18/9879587/b1fed4c598e3/cureus-0014-00000033012-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc18/9879587/42d8639799ec/cureus-0014-00000033012-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc18/9879587/2419a3581895/cureus-0014-00000033012-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc18/9879587/da0c61e2e893/cureus-0014-00000033012-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc18/9879587/74228749cb49/cureus-0014-00000033012-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc18/9879587/ee28a4670bc0/cureus-0014-00000033012-i06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc18/9879587/30fabd264cea/cureus-0014-00000033012-i07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc18/9879587/7db6e7a4c38e/cureus-0014-00000033012-i08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc18/9879587/7a8613407acb/cureus-0014-00000033012-i09.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc18/9879587/73fec71c6f62/cureus-0014-00000033012-i10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc18/9879587/cc58859b2a61/cureus-0014-00000033012-i11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc18/9879587/94f49c119031/cureus-0014-00000033012-i12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc18/9879587/b1fed4c598e3/cureus-0014-00000033012-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc18/9879587/42d8639799ec/cureus-0014-00000033012-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc18/9879587/2419a3581895/cureus-0014-00000033012-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc18/9879587/da0c61e2e893/cureus-0014-00000033012-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc18/9879587/74228749cb49/cureus-0014-00000033012-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc18/9879587/ee28a4670bc0/cureus-0014-00000033012-i06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc18/9879587/30fabd264cea/cureus-0014-00000033012-i07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc18/9879587/7db6e7a4c38e/cureus-0014-00000033012-i08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc18/9879587/7a8613407acb/cureus-0014-00000033012-i09.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc18/9879587/73fec71c6f62/cureus-0014-00000033012-i10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc18/9879587/cc58859b2a61/cureus-0014-00000033012-i11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc18/9879587/94f49c119031/cureus-0014-00000033012-i12.jpg

相似文献

1
The Effect of Clinical Sandblasting With Different Powders on the Surface Roughness of Cores for Metal-Ceramic Crowns and Their Fracture Resistance After the Addition of Repair Material: An In-Vitro Study.不同粉末临床喷砂处理对金属烤瓷冠核表面粗糙度及其添加修复材料后抗折强度的影响:一项体外研究
Cureus. 2022 Dec 27;14(12):e33012. doi: 10.7759/cureus.33012. eCollection 2022 Dec.
2
Shear bond strength of veneering ceramic to zirconia core after different surface treatments.不同表面处理后饰面陶瓷与氧化锆核的剪切粘结强度。
Photomed Laser Surg. 2013 Jun;31(6):261-8. doi: 10.1089/pho.2013.3487.
3
Effects of surface conditioning on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to temporary polycarbonate crowns.表面处理对上颌前牙临时冠粘结正畸托槽的剪切粘结强度的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Jul;138(1):72-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.08.030.
4
Chemical composition, surface roughness, and ceramic bond strength of additively manufactured cobalt-chromium dental alloys.增材制造钴铬牙科合金的化学成分、表面粗糙度和陶瓷结合强度。
J Prosthet Dent. 2021 May;125(5):825-831. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.03.012. Epub 2020 May 25.
5
Fatigue Resistance of Y-TZP/Porcelain Crowns is Not Influenced by the Conditioning of the Intaglio Surface.氧化锆全瓷/烤瓷冠的抗疲劳性能不受牙体制备表面处理的影响。
Oper Dent. 2016 Jan-Feb;41(1):E1-12. doi: 10.2341/14-166-L. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
6
[Effects of different surface modifications on micro-structure and adhesion of zirconia ceramic: an in vitro study].[不同表面改性对氧化锆陶瓷微观结构和附着力的影响:一项体外研究]
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2017 Feb 1;35(1):43-50. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2017.01.006.
7
To Evaluate Effect of Airborne Particle Abrasion using Different Abrasives Particles and Compare Two Commercial Available Zirconia on Flexural Strength on Heat Treatment.评估使用不同磨料颗粒的空气颗粒磨损效果,并比较两种市售氧化锆在热处理时的抗弯强度。
Int J Biomed Sci. 2017 Jun;13(2):93-112.
8
The influence of incisal veneering porcelain thickness of two metal ceramic crown systems on failure resistance after cyclic loading.两种金属烤瓷冠系统切端瓷厚度对循环加载后抗破坏能力的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2010 May;103(5):275-82. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60058-3.
9
Post-fatigue fracture resistance of metal core crowns: press-on metal ceramic versus a conventional veneering system.金属核冠的疲劳后抗折性能:压铸金属陶瓷与传统贴面系统的比较
J Clin Exp Dent. 2015 Apr 1;7(2):e278-83. doi: 10.4317/jced.52267. eCollection 2015 Apr.
10
Bond strength of the porcelain repair system to all-ceramic copings and porcelain.瓷修复系统与全瓷冠及瓷之间的粘结强度。
J Prosthodont. 2014 Feb;23(2):112-6. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12064. Epub 2013 May 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of glazing and hydrothermal aging on the fracture strength of metal-ceramic single restorations after additional firing: an in vitro study.上釉和水热老化对额外烧制后金属陶瓷单冠修复体断裂强度的影响:一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 May 28;25(1):839. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05972-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative Assessment of the Functional Parameters for Metal-Ceramic and All-Ceramic Teeth Restorations in Prosthetic Dentistry-A Literature Review.口腔修复学中金属陶瓷与全陶瓷牙齿修复体功能参数的比较评估——文献综述
Biology (Basel). 2022 Apr 5;11(4):556. doi: 10.3390/biology11040556.
2
Comparison of Bond Strength in the Different Class of Resin Cements to Cast and CAD/CAM Co-Cr Alloys.不同类别的树脂水门汀与铸造及CAD/CAM钴铬合金之间粘结强度的比较。
Int J Dent. 2021 Dec 26;2021:7843979. doi: 10.1155/2021/7843979. eCollection 2021.
3
The Effect of Mechanical and Chemical Surface Preparation Methods on the Bond Strength in Repairing the Surface of Metal-Ceramic Crowns with Composite Resin: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
机械和化学表面处理方法对复合树脂修复金属烤瓷冠表面粘结强度的影响:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Maedica (Bucur). 2020 Jun;15(2):206-223. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2020.15.2.206.
4
Fit of cobalt-chromium copings fabricated by the selective laser melting technology and casting method: A comparative evaluation using a profilometer.选择性激光熔化技术和铸造法制作的钴铬基底冠的适配性:使用轮廓仪的对比评估
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2020 May 23;17(3):200-207. eCollection 2020 May-Jun.
5
Chemical composition, surface roughness, and ceramic bond strength of additively manufactured cobalt-chromium dental alloys.增材制造钴铬牙科合金的化学成分、表面粗糙度和陶瓷结合强度。
J Prosthet Dent. 2021 May;125(5):825-831. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.03.012. Epub 2020 May 25.
6
Comparison of bite force on the dominant and nondominant sides of patients with habitual unilateral chewing: a pilot study.习惯性单侧咀嚼患者优势侧与非优势侧咬合力的比较:一项初步研究。
Gen Dent. 2020 Mar-Apr;68(2):60-63.
7
Influence of Different Surface Treatments on the Shear Bond Strength of Resin Cement to Base Metal Alloys.不同表面处理对树脂水门汀与贱金属合金之间剪切粘结强度的影响。
J Lasers Med Sci. 2020 Winter;11(1):45-49. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2020.08. Epub 2020 Jan 18.
8
Demystifying Modern Dental Ceramics.揭开现代牙科陶瓷的神秘面纱。
Prim Dent J. 2019 Nov 1;8(3):28-33. doi: 10.1308/205016819827601527.
9
Comparing two intraoral porcelain repair systems for shear bond strength in repaired cohesive and adhesive fractures, for porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations: An study.比较两种口腔内瓷修复系统在修复烤瓷熔附金属修复体的内聚性和黏附性骨折时的抗剪粘结强度:一项研究。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2019 Oct-Dec;19(4):362-368. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_120_19. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
10
Optimal sandblasting conditions for conventional-type yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystals.常规型氧化钇稳定四方氧化锆多晶体制备的最佳喷砂条件。
Dent Mater. 2019 Jan;35(1):169-175. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.11.009. Epub 2018 Nov 28.